To Tordenskjold

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

To Tordenskjold

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Opponents wanted >> To Tordenskjold

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

To Tordenskjold - 12/19/2005 9:56:48 AM

jeffs

Posts: 644
Joined: 2/19/2004
From: Tokyo
Status: offline

I saw you wrote this...

Would agree to everything but Allied DC.....

If you have interest you can get me at

jeff@sports-j.net

Hello, would like to play against you as Japs. Only played 15 rounds against a human oponent and thus have limited experience. Scenario 17 is good and long. Have been advised from more experienced players the following "house rules"

Jap naval commitment 160% (Gives the japs one more carrier during campaign if I got it right)
Reinforcements-Varable
Allied repair advantage-Off
Jap sub docrine-On (historical correct)

Thats it I think, yes and only use carrier squadrons on carriers, not landbased. This is also historical correct since special training is needed to land on a carrier deck.

Scenario 17 is fine. If I am Jap I start. Ok by you?

Tordenskjold

_____________________________

To quote from Evans/Peattie`s {Kaigun}
"Mistakes in operations and tactics can be corrected, but
political and strategic mistakes live forever". The authors were refering to Japan but the same could be said of the US misadventure in Iraq

Post #: 1

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Opponents wanted >> To Tordenskjold

Page: [1]