lvaces
Posts: 35
Joined: 4/14/2005 Status: offline
|
Having already done A. S. Johnston today, let me go for the Johnston double header and do Joseph E. today also. Leadership - 6 (Great) His men always believed in him, and one of main reasons he was restored to command of the Army of the Tennessee after Bragg was to restore morale, so a high rating here. Tactics - 5 (Good) Johnston would get 2 very different ratings for offensive and defensive tactics. Defense would be a 6, but offense only 3. Since he almost always defended, lean his rating towards the defense, and take the balance away from his initiative rating. He certainly had an eye for picking good ground to defend, as Sherman could testify. Command - 4 (Fair) For all his strengths, Joseph E. always lost. He had 3 major commands. First the defense of Virginia against McClellen and was driven back to the gates of Richmond before being wounded and giving way to Lee. Second, a General in Chief role in the west during which he was strangely passive while Grant took Vicksburg. Third, defender of Georgia against Sherman, and again Johnston was driven back to the gates of the city he was supposed to be defending before being removed from command. As I said for A Johnston, it is hard to give more than a 3 to a commander who never won. Maybe we give him 1 bonus point because while he always lost, he did always lose slowly, so make him a 4. Initiative - 2 (Poor) Here is where Johnston's problem seems to be. He never took control of the initiative and imposed his will on the enemy. During the whole Georgia campaign, he never launched a single significant counter-attack. He was forced back to Richmond by McClellen(!) and only counter-attacked at the very last minute (at Seven Oaks, which was screwed up). Sent west as General in Chief to stop Grant from taking Vicksburg, he might as well never left Richmond for his effect on the situation. 3 generals down ... 997 to go.
|