.50Kerry
Posts: 325
Joined: 3/30/2004 From: a long dark river winding through the jungles.... Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: flanyboy Art he is refering to grant and many union generals being "over" rated. I would aruge people get strat and tactics mixed up, grant was only average on tactics or above average he never proved more than that, on the tactical front. Absolutely unture, Grant performed several excellent tactical operations Fort Donelson coming to mind. The fans of the "Marble Men" don't get it. Wars are won at the operational and strategic level, battles at the tactical. It is true that Grant did not show tactical genius often after 1862, but that simply cannot be a reflection that he had bigger fish to fry can it? The "S'othren Cause" would have been far better served with leadership that was willing to focus on the operational and strategic level rather than executing perfect internal lines on the fly. Grant grasped that war could not be a seasonal activity. Previously wars were conducted when the seasons best permitted, or when men could be away from their farms. Grant waged war year-round, recognizing that "total" war would cause, among other things, civilian discomfort and reduce the political will of the enemy. Under Grant, Union armies did not retire to winter quarters to refit and reorganize, and they would require their enemies to remain in the field against them. That sort of wore the Marble Men out. Moss Robbitt even grasped that he had to evolve past the tactical and focus on the operational, "I plan and work…to bring the troops to the right place at the right time." Lee and Grant had more in common than different. I can certainly see where early subordinate Union generals may well need to be pegged for "the slows" but you can accuse Grant and the Ohio Mafia of many things....a case of the slows not being one of them. The Union leadership far outshone the "Blessed Confederacy suh's" in the west as a baseline. p.s. Grant and Lee lost similar ratios of their forces afield.
< Message edited by .50Kerry -- 12/7/2006 3:36:18 PM >
_____________________________
Anchors aweigh!
|