Book Recommendations

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Book Recommendations

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> PureSim Baseball >> Book Recommendations

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Book Recommendations - 5/23/2008 3:04:21 PM

Adam Parker

Posts: 1848
Joined: 4/2/2002
From: Melbourne Australia
Status: offline

On the kind advice of KG Erwin, I'm taking up an invite to drop by this hallowed forum to pick your brains if I may, PureSim purchase still pending

I'm looking for advice on texts currently in print, that I can pick up on a visit to the States shortly pending:

1. Best 1 volume history of baseball.

2. Best 1 volume all teams coverage.

3. Best Red Sox history.

4. Best Yankees history.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts you can pass my way.

Kind regards,
Adam.

Post #: 1

RE: Book Recommendations - 5/24/2008 12:59:28 AM

KG Erwin

Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline

Thank you, Adam. (blushing)

As for best baseball books, I did a quick Google search.

One-volume history : "Baseball: A History of America's Game", by Benjamin G. Rader

The Red Sox: "Red Sox Century", by Richard A. Johnson

I don't own either of these, so hopefully some of my esteemed colleagues will weigh in.

However, a volume I DO own is the literally massive "Total Baseball", which was recently updated. It is much more than a reference. Apart from the stats, this tome has many many great articles on the teams and the development of the game. If I were to recommend just one book, it would be this one.

Of course, there are hundreds of websites, but these two, IMHO, are essential:

1. http://www.baseball-reference.com/
2. http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/

< Message edited by KG Erwin -- 5/24/2008 1:03:03 AM >

(in reply to Adam Parker)

Post #: 2