Ironman Scenario not fully patched

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Ironman Scenario not fully patched

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Ironman Scenario not fully patched

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Ironman Scenario not fully patched - 11/28/2009 8:48:37 AM

Kull

Posts: 2625
Joined: 7/3/2007
From: El Paso, TX
Status: offline

This is not comprehensive, but a quick look at a new start Ironman Scenario (Allies) shows:

1) Christmas Island Resources are not swapped.
2) Chinchow is still a port (s/b an airbase)
3) Although the map reads "Ahmedabad", the Base window and the tooltip both spell it "Ahmadabad".
4) No resources for Anchorage
5) All the Port sizes that were supposed to decrease (Pago Pago, Dutch Harbor, Kiska, etc.), stayed the same

As a doublecheck I also started up Scenario 1 (allies) and the above problems didn't exist. Several others were common to both scenarios, however:

1) There are still two Indus PGs (one in Trincomalee and the other in Karachi)
2) The RCMP Terrace Base Force is still in the old location (although the Base and railroad have moved)
3) VMF-211 is now at Wake AND Pearl Harbor (by design?)

Edit: Day 2 Ironman File attached

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kull -- 11/28/2009 3:29:57 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: Ironman Scenario not fully patched - 11/28/2009 3:29:25 PM

Kull

Posts: 2625
Joined: 7/3/2007
From: El Paso, TX
Status: offline

And for comparison, here's the Day 2 Allied file for Scenario 1:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kull)

Post #: 2

RE: Ironman Scenario not fully patched - 11/28/2009 3:39:43 PM

Takeshi

Posts: 51
Joined: 8/11/2009
From: West TN
Status: offline

None of the 1.094 Map/Base changes are in the Dec 8 scn (6 and 9) either. I spot checked the ship name and arrival time changes in 6 and 9 and they seem to be OK but it was not a comprehensive check. If I have time this weekend I'll check the DBs more thoroughly in scn other than 1.

(in reply to Kull)

Post #: 3