zakblood
Posts: 22687
Joined: 10/4/2012 Status: offline
|
sign of the times is that most players do want eye candy and online Multiplayer more than single player, so the developers imo have given them what they have continued to keep asking for, not that i agree also, being a single player gamer myself etc, who tends to not play online in hardly any game now, well not war games anyway, just not good enough or have the time or ability etc,... but do understand also that it's what sells, and war games as a whole compared to elsewhere eg FPS etc don't on the same scale, so in numbers terms, it's better to give player on the whole what they ask for, and from a testers point of view and forum mass reader, more ask for eye candy and Multiplayer still than AI for single player. but saying that, imo the AI has improved over the last few years with some games, war games this is giving me at least more of a challenge than in the past, and when you get to a given age, you can remember what it used to be like etc, with V FOR VICTORY MARKET GARDEN or ARNHEM THE 'MARKET GARDEN' OPERATION as 2 examples etc, against Desert War 1940 - 1942 or lets say Campaign Series Middle East 1948-1985, or even the likes of games from the Flashpoint Campaigns Series, any of which give you a good run for your money on the AI stakes. with the gronards types giving a real challenge on a given difficulty level WITE / WITW or WITP etc and don't even get me started on the Command Modern Air / Naval Operations series, as the AI is masterful to say the least, so there has been some large improvements on the AI side in some given games, i could name others, which for me do stand out as enjoyable in the single player side, but then again, i guess it also depends on you're skill level as well, which maybe higher than mine,...
|