first impressions

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

first impressions

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Scourge of War Gettysburg Series >> first impressions

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

first impressions - 8/8/2013 1:02:40 AM

gwgardner

Posts: 6722
Joined: 4/7/2006
Status: offline

The tutorials alone in this game are more fun than some other complete games.

The GUI is intuitive and surprisingly simple in a game with such complexity.

The graphics are excellent but as far I can tell, not a drag on the computer.

It's an immersive gaming experience.

I'd recommend to anyone to give this game a try.

< Message edited by gwgardner -- 8/8/2013 1:04:04 AM >

Post #: 1

RE: first impressions - 8/17/2013 12:19:06 AM

gwgardner

Posts: 6722
Joined: 4/7/2006
Status: offline

Modding is easy and fun too. It was a snap to mod the first scenario (Buford's defense of McPherson's Ridge) to play from the Confederate side.

The possibilities seem endless with this game. I see that others have modded it to simulate Napoleonic warfare, the War of Spanish Succession, the Seven Years War, Jackson's Campaign in the Valley, and so on.

(in reply to gwgardner)

Post #: 2

RE: first impressions - 10/31/2013 6:51:33 PM

milkweg

Posts: 546
Joined: 7/23/2007
Status: offline

"The graphics are excellent but as far I can tell, not a drag on the computer."

Sorry, but I feel the need to disagree on this one. The graphics engine is not very efficient and I have i5 3570, 16GB of ram and GTX 580 vid card (have GTX 780 on the way), I get far smoother frame rates in Battlefield 3 than this game and BF3 has a ton of complex graphical stuff going on too.

(in reply to gwgardner)

Post #: 3

RE: first impressions - 10/31/2013 7:35:00 PM

histgamer

Posts: 1455
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline

As someone who enjoys bf I don't think its fair to compare fps in a first person shooter to a game like this. First person likely has more impressive 3D modeling but they're dumb graphics in that they are not objects that think and respond to whatever is occurring. There are far more moving and thinking parts to render in a sow or even a game like wargame air land battle than in any first person shooter.

quote:

ORIGINAL: milkweg

"The graphics are excellent but as far I can tell, not a drag on the computer."

Sorry, but I feel the need to disagree on this one. The graphics engine is not very efficient and I have i5 3570, 16GB of ram and GTX 580 vid card (have GTX 780 on the way), I get far smoother frame rates in Battlefield 3 than this game and BF3 has a ton of complex graphical stuff going on too.

< Message edited by flanyboy -- 10/31/2013 7:36:18 PM >

(in reply to milkweg)

Post #: 4

RE: first impressions - 10/31/2013 7:56:05 PM

2ndACR

Posts: 5665
Joined: 8/31/2003
From: Irving,Tx
Status: offline

You are forgetting that in SOW you have thousands of sprites, firing, marching, attacking etc. That will tax any PC. It is not so much the graphics as all the ballistic calcs taking place. I have fought some mongo battles and see little to any lag in solo play. Now MP, there are times when the stuff lags, but that can be internet speed, PC speed of the slowest machine etc.

Nothing comes close to the immersion feeling than SOW.

Add in Bugle mod and the Peninsular OOB mods and you got some serious sandbox gaming either solo or MP. I have fallen in love with the Peninsular OOB. Have fought some serious battles in MP with that one.

(in reply to histgamer)

Post #: 5

RE: first impressions - 10/31/2013 11:08:50 PM

rickier65

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline

is it possible to create new maps for SOW Gettysburg? Or is it limited to maps that come with it, or that come with the expansion modules?

Thanks
Rick

(in reply to 2ndACR)

Post #: 6

RE: first impressions - 11/5/2013 12:03:11 AM

2ndACR

Posts: 5665
Joined: 8/31/2003
From: Irving,Tx
Status: offline

The map creation from what I understand is still a closed program. Open to team members only. There are more maps and stuff at http://www.norbsoftdev.net/forum/index.

(in reply to rickier65)

Post #: 7

RE: first impressions - 11/28/2013 9:29:57 AM

milkweg

Posts: 546
Joined: 7/23/2007
Status: offline

Bah, you are just making up excuses for lack of efficiency.

If you close in the draw distance the frame rate increases dramatically so that is proof the issue is the graphics engine and nothing to do with cpu calculations for the AI.

I am not saying I do not like the game and am just giving constructive criticism. They should get rid of the blurry 2D sprites in favour of 3D models and create a more efficient graphics engine. Those trees are really taxing too.

< Message edited by milkweg -- 11/28/2013 10:38:18 AM >

(in reply to 2ndACR)

Post #: 8

RE: first impressions - 11/28/2013 10:34:37 PM

histgamer

Posts: 1455
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: milkweg

Bah, you are just making up excuses for lack of efficiency.

If you close in the draw distance the frame rate increases dramatically so that is proof the issue is the graphics engine and nothing to do with cpu calculations for the AI.

I am not saying I do not like the game and am just giving constructive criticism. They should get rid of the blurry 2D sprites in favor of 3D models and create a more efficient graphics engine. Those trees are really taxing too.

The Tree's look great though! I personally love how improved the terrain graphics are, its really good imho.

They'd have to dramatically cut down on the sprite ratio to get 3D soldiers in. If you want a RTW game with a limit of about 6,000 guys on the battlefield at any one point then you can go 3D. A mid range card has issues with RTW on huge settings and only about a 5,000 man battle, if you try to crank that up to SOW figures for the bigger battles of 15,000+ sprites on the field you'll need a Titan to run the damn game.

< Message edited by flanyboy -- 11/28/2013 11:36:53 PM >

(in reply to milkweg)

Post #: 9

RE: first impressions - 11/29/2013 5:15:08 PM

aaatoysandmore

Posts: 2848
Joined: 9/11/2013
Status: offline

I personally liked the old style graphics of 2nd Manassas. Just something about the units that looked more glossy and the trees were awesome in that game, although I had them turned off most of the time so I could see my units. No one can argue though that the ai isn't great.

This is one of the "few" games I don't complain about the ai. I enjoy it very much and it is a great challenge to me.

(in reply to histgamer)

Post #: 10

RE: first impressions - 11/29/2013 5:17:00 PM

aaatoysandmore

Posts: 2848
Joined: 9/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2ndACR

The map creation from what I understand is still a closed program. Open to team members only. There are more maps and stuff at http://www.norbsoftdev.net/forum/index.

Link is not working:

The webpage cannot be found
HTTP 404
Most likely causes:
�There might be a typing error in the address.
�If you clicked on a link, it may be out of date.

What you can try:
Retype the address.

Go back to the previous page.

Go to and look for the information you want.

(in reply to 2ndACR)

Post #: 11

RE: first impressions - 11/29/2013 5:22:03 PM

aaatoysandmore

Posts: 2848
Joined: 9/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2ndACR

You are forgetting that in SOW you have thousands of sprites, firing, marching, attacking etc. That will tax any PC. It is not so much the graphics as all the ballistic calcs taking place. I have fought some mongo battles and see little to any lag in solo play. Now MP, there are times when the stuff lags, but that can be internet speed, PC speed of the slowest machine etc.

Nothing comes close to the immersion feeling than SOW.

Add in Bugle mod and the Peninsular OOB mods and you got some serious sandbox gaming either solo or MP. I have fallen in love with the Peninsular OOB. Have fought some serious battles in MP with that one.

I play in sandbox mode all the time in SOW and it doesn't tax my computer when I have thousands of units on the map. In fact the whole union and confederate army. I guess it just depends on the system you have and the optimization you do. My system is fast compared to most who probably browse malicious sites (porn lol) and get virus's your virus protector doesn't detect. I do computer maint on the side and you wouldn't believe the virus programs I've found outside of the virus protector most people use. One is not enough anymore. I have 3-5 I use to detect everything an even that may not be enough.

(in reply to 2ndACR)

Post #: 12

RE: first impressions - 11/29/2013 5:59:42 PM

2ndACR

Posts: 5665
Joined: 8/31/2003
From: Irving,Tx
Status: offline

http://www.norbsoftdev.net/forum/index

Hmmmm, just copied the link again. Same thing and this one works but the first one does not.

I got a small group that plays co-op against the AI in sandbox. Using the hunt them down, which we prefer, you never know here the AI might pop up. Have to cover every road into a area or find a enemy div in your rear. But yes, the AI can be very slick.

I have never had any lag at all when playing solo, only when we have several players going in MP do we see any lag. Solo things run smooth as silk.

< Message edited by 2ndACR -- 11/29/2013 7:04:10 PM >

(in reply to aaatoysandmore)

Post #: 13

RE: first impressions - 11/29/2013 11:31:35 PM

e_barkmann

Posts: 1307
Joined: 4/18/2000
From: Adelaide, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

Hmmmm, just copied the link again. Same thing and this one works but the first one does not.

You put a . at the end of the url which broke it.

_____________________________

Scourge of War multiplayer group

http://steamcommunity.com/groups/sowwaterloo

(in reply to 2ndACR)

Post #: 14

RE: first impressions - 11/30/2013 4:34:15 AM

2ndACR

Posts: 5665
Joined: 8/31/2003
From: Irving,Tx
Status: offline

Ah, my bad......sorry about that guys.

(in reply to e_barkmann)

Post #: 15

RE: first impressions - 11/30/2013 11:55:59 AM

Alchenar

Posts: 360
Joined: 8/2/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: aaatoysandmore

I personally liked the old style graphics of 2nd Manassas. Just something about the units that looked more glossy and the trees were awesome in that game, although I had them turned off most of the time so I could see my units. No one can argue though that the ai isn't great.�This is one of the "few" games I don't complain about the ai. I enjoy it very much and it is a great challenge to me.

I think you are completely right about the graphics. 2nd Manassas had that same broad spread of bright, simple colours that Sid Meier's Gettysburg! had and that isn't just visually appealing, it makes it practically very easy to cast your eye over the map and take in what's going on.

I think that Scourge of War made a big mistake in changing the art style to something that's too complex and turns the screen into a mash of colour where it's difficult to pick out detail.

(in reply to aaatoysandmore)

Post #: 16