GC 1941 - Closed

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

GC 1941 - Closed

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> Opponents Wanted >> GC 1941 - Closed

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

GC 1941 - Closed - 10/14/2021 7:40:18 PM

jubjub

Posts: 493
Joined: 5/2/2021
Status: offline

Want to start a new Axis campaign once the newest patch comes out in the next few days. Looking for an experienced Soviet player.

Enhanced TB control On
Full Fog of War
Full Movement FOW

House Rules:
No paratrooper drops
No naval invasions west of Sevastopol after it's been captured
No air missions with more than 200 sorties in a flight in '41
No removing SU's from ZOC'd units and HQ's

< Message edited by jubjub -- 10/15/2021 3:40:47 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: GC 1941 - 10/15/2021 7:05:27 AM

Nix77

Posts: 561
Joined: 10/2/2016
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jubjub

No removing SU's from ZOC'd units and HQ's

Sorry, unrelated to your opponent search, but how would you define "ZOC'd units"? I've been also thinking that the mass evacuation of support units through a narrow gap in a pocket seems a bit unrealistic, but not sure how to enforce this in a game, or how the devs could fix that.

I think an easy fix for this would be to require the HQ to have the "off-rail MP" less than around 5-15MP (maybe?) to be able to send support units out. Not sure how it's currently limited, since HQs can move SUs inside a pocket freely, which is OK in my opinion. Seems like it's a simple isolated/not isolated switch.

(in reply to jubjub)

Post #: 2

RE: GC 1941 - 10/15/2021 12:09:39 PM

jubjub

Posts: 493
Joined: 5/2/2021
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nix77

quote:

ORIGINAL: jubjub

No removing SU's from ZOC'd units and HQ's

Sorry, unrelated to your opponent search, but how would you define "ZOC'd units"? I've been also thinking that the mass evacuation of support units through a narrow gap in a pocket seems a bit unrealistic, but not sure how to enforce this in a game, or how the devs could fix that.

I think an easy fix for this would be to require the HQ to have the "off-rail MP" less than around 5-15MP (maybe?) to be able to send support units out. Not sure how it's currently limited, since HQs can move SUs inside a pocket freely, which is OK in my opinion. Seems like it's a simple isolated/not isolated switch.

Yeah it's mainly to prevent evacuation of support units. Trust me, it's pretty easy to catch, although I do think the devs should implement it as a rule.

To clarify, you can only move SU's to an HQ if you can trace a path from the original HQ that doesn't incur the ZOC to ZOC MP penalty described in 38.7.1. You're free to change HQ's within a pocket (closed or unclosed) and try to sneak them out with the HQ as long as you follow this rule.

I'm a big proponent of the off-rail MP idea, but it's too much calculation and should be handled by the devs.

(in reply to Nix77)

Post #: 3