Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

"strategically" & "tactically"...

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> "strategically" & "tactically"... Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
"strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/26/2008 5:54:21 AM   
cymloveselva

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline 		Hi all, I'm new here, but I'm not new to TOAW...
I keep my faith in believing that TOAW is the godlike wargame of all time... But if somebody feels something not right about this, please share your thoughts
However, until now, I'm still confused with a few things...
Let's start with these two terms first: "strategically" & "tactically"...
Everyone has their own definitions, so do I. But I'm not too convinced about my definition on differentiate them...
I really need some help...
Pleazeeeeeeee...
Post #: 1
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/26/2008 2:05:07 PM   
el cid


Posts: 186
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline 		And don´t forget "operationally".

In my view, which might be wrong,

Strategic is the top level planing that wins you a war. Say, taking Paris to have France surrender, or taking the oil fields in the South of Russia to have enough oil for the war.

Tactical is what you face on the ground. To take that out that Machine Gun move that squad there, while they are covered by that other squad, etc.


(in reply to cymloveselva)
Post #: 2
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/26/2008 5:05:20 PM   
macgregor


Posts: 990
Joined: 2/10/2004
Status: offline 		This is a good question. I've always known 'strategic' (like el cid said) as top-level planning and includes warfare to cripple the enemy's economy through the destruction of factories and resources. Espionage and even terrorism would be classified as strategic warfare. 'Operational' refers to the movement of military formations as covered in TOAW(invasions to campaigns to achieve specific objectives). Tactical would refer to squad and perhaps platoon level tactics. Tactics being more about 'how' warfare is conducted.

(in reply to el cid)
Post #: 3
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/26/2008 6:47:55 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline 		Strategic - the long term goal to victory(example, destroy enemy army)
Operational - how to achieve the long term goal in the field(example, pincer movement to destroy enemy army group)
Tactical - how to achieve the operational goal(example, punch through enemy line and capture road junction).

(in reply to macgregor)
Post #: 4
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/29/2008 2:50:42 PM   
cymloveselva

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline 		ok, i get the picture...
but one thing catch my eyes: "cripple the enemy's economy through the destruction of factories and resources"
how does TOAW model such situation...?

(in reply to macgregor)
Post #: 5
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/29/2008 3:37:03 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline 		Doesn't really, apart from scenario designer placing hexes which increase/decrease enemy production.

(in reply to cymloveselva)
Post #: 6
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/29/2008 5:14:11 PM   
SunCat


Posts: 9
Joined: 1/19/2008
From: Siberia
Status: offline 		Strategy it is  geography.

Tactics it is topography.


_____________________________

Feci, quod potui, faciant meliora potentes...

(in reply to Karri)
Post #: 7
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/30/2008 1:44:33 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		the 3 G's -

Strategy is what governments do.
Operations is what generals do.
Tactics is what grunts do.

(in reply to SunCat)
Post #: 8
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/30/2008 1:19:39 PM   
Heldenkaiser

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 8/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work

the 3 G's -

Strategy is what governments do.
Operations is what generals do.
Tactics is what grunts do.


Didn't know that one, but I love it.

Generally, there is sometimes a certain confusion, especially between Americans (or the English-speaking people generally?) and Europeans, over these terms. As one can see from the answers in this thread so far, some people refer to the highest level of *military* planning as "strategy" and to the government war planning (political, economic etc. aspects of the war included) as "grand strategy". Others--and that's more or less the common European doctrine--see the latter as "strategy" and the former as "operations". Of course, operations can also border on tactics and vice versa. The classic answer to the dilemma was to define tactics as whatever happens ON the battlefield and operations as all that you need to bring your troops TO the battlefield. But of course, where does a battlefield end in modern war ... ?

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 9
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/31/2008 12:43:20 AM   
Foggy

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 6/19/2006
From: matthewcox2001@gmail.com
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cymloveselva

ok, i get the picture...
but one thing catch my eyes: "cripple the enemy's economy through the destruction of factories and resources"
how does TOAW model such situation...?


There's a awesome scen called DNO - look it up

(in reply to cymloveselva)
Post #: 10
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 1/31/2008 5:59:17 PM   
el cid


Posts: 186
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Foggy

There's a awesome scen called DNO - look it up


Is there a version for TOAW3?

(in reply to Foggy)
Post #: 11
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 2/1/2008 8:06:51 AM   
cymloveselva

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Foggy


quote:

ORIGINAL: cymloveselva

ok, i get the picture...
but one thing catch my eyes: "cripple the enemy's economy through the destruction of factories and resources"
how does TOAW model such situation...?


There's a awesome scen called DNO - look it up


DNO??
I don't seen any DNO scen in my folder...

(in reply to Foggy)
Post #: 12
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 2/1/2008 4:43:59 PM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: el cid


quote:

ORIGINAL: Foggy

There's a awesome scen called DNO - look it up


Is there a version for TOAW3?


Not unless you convert your own ACOW version.

Players might want to take a look at my "Soviet Union 1941" scenario in the WWII East Front folder for an example of modeling factories, refineries, oil fields, personnel centers, etc.

(in reply to el cid)
Post #: 13
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 2/2/2008 3:38:08 AM   
cymloveselva

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline 		Not sure if the is any possibilities of having solid "unit" of factories, refineries, oil fields, personnel centers, etc...

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 14
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 2/2/2008 3:43:12 PM   
Raindem

 

Posts: 696
Joined: 7/15/2000
From: Arizona
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cymloveselva

Not sure if the is any possibilities of having solid "unit" of factories, refineries, oil fields, personnel centers, etc...

I model factories so to speak in Campaign for South Vietnam. They are stationary targets (units) that yield an economic result (supply, replacements) when destroyed by bombing. Civilian targets are in the same hex which cause a penalty (victory points) when destroyed.

_____________________________

Grab them by the balls. Their hearts and minds will follow.

(in reply to cymloveselva)
Post #: 15
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 2/2/2008 11:37:18 PM   
Foggy

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 6/19/2006
From: matthewcox2001@gmail.com
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raindem


quote:

ORIGINAL: cymloveselva

Not sure if the is any possibilities of having solid "unit" of factories, refineries, oil fields, personnel centers, etc...

I model factories so to speak in Campaign for South Vietnam. They are stationary targets (units) that yield an economic result (supply, replacements) when destroyed by bombing. Civilian targets are in the same hex which cause a penalty (victory points) when destroyed.

DNO is the ultimate model for the Eastern Front in in 1941- maybe it's not the best - but it's damn close :)

(in reply to Raindem)
Post #: 16
RE: "strategically" & "tactically"... - 2/3/2008 3:01:58 PM   
cymloveselva

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Foggy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raindem


quote:

ORIGINAL: cymloveselva

Not sure if the is any possibilities of having solid "unit" of factories, refineries, oil fields, personnel centers, etc...

I model factories so to speak in Campaign for South Vietnam. They are stationary targets (units) that yield an economic result (supply, replacements) when destroyed by bombing. Civilian targets are in the same hex which cause a penalty (victory points) when destroyed.

DNO is the ultimate model for the Eastern Front in in 1941- maybe it's not the best - but it's damn close :)


DNO?
I should give it a try then

(in reply to Foggy)
Post #: 17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> "strategically" & "tactically"... Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.266