TheReal_Pak40
Posts: 186
Joined: 10/8/2003 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nomada_Firefox I understand very well your english but you are telling something from one game and it is incorrect, on CM there are not action on real time because it is as one film, you make your movements, orders and next game makes a film from all these. It is not action on real time. Well, your definition of 'real time' must differ from mine. Real time means that 1 second of game time = 1 second of our time. And by that definition the action(or film, as you like to call it) unfolds in 'real time'. quote:
Only on your opinion. Well, actually it's mine and a LOT of others out there. There's a reason why there are so many posters over on the Battlefront forums which have literally posted hundreds of thousands of posts. I'm certainly not speaking for them or their beliefs. But, like I say, there's a reason that there are so many faithful to the CM series and it's not because it's unrealistic. quote:
The opinion from a few people, I play many times with players who they play CM and CC games and they know the differences. Of couse if they think this, they are not serious. They are arrogant. No, it's not arrogance, it's their opinion. Are you more arrogant because you think CC is more realistic? No, of course not. quote:
I do not know if CC is worse or better Combat Simulator but I know that some military corps from some countries use it for training. It should speak better from CC games. Yes, but, then again I'm guessing the Marines are using a customized version of CC. It's not the same game that we play. BTW, Battlefront has said that CMSF is being been used at the Army's Command and General Staff College. Like I said earlier, both games have their strengths and weaknesses and I enjoy playing both games. I've bought every single original CC game 1-5 plus WaR. But CM is a more realistic betrayal of WWII combat in my opinion. If you want we can discuss the strengths and weaknesses of both games as they pertain to realism.
|