Feature Request

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Feature Request

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Panzer Command: Ostfront >> Feature Request

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Feature Request - 8/6/2011 10:09:26 AM

notenome

Posts: 608
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline

This is something which has little to do with the specifics of the game but to me is absolutely crucial. I really liked, loved actually, the mega campaigns for Steel Panthers, and can never understand why that campaign design isnt used more often. Now Ostfront has campaigns, upgrades, a persistent core force, however the campaigns are purely linear. So a simple feature request is to at least make it possible that the outcome of a battle (Decisive, Legendary, Marginal etc) dictate what the next scenario will be. That would make it possible for modders to create dynamic campaigns, which would be awesome.

Post #: 1

RE: Feature Request - 8/6/2011 2:23:01 PM

junk2drive

Posts: 12907
Joined: 6/27/2002
From: Arizona West Coast
Status: offline

As I recall the Mega Campaigns were not random generated scenarios. For each possible battle a scenario had to be made. At least the map and opposing force. It is a huge undertaking and why you have not seen another after Screaming Eagles.

Our random generated campaigns give you a mix of battles and forces but no branching.

_____________________________

Conflict of Heroes "Most games are like checkers or chess and some have dice and cards involved too. This game plays like checkers but you think like chess and the dice and cards can change everything in real time."

(in reply to notenome)

Post #: 2

RE: Feature Request - 8/6/2011 5:14:36 PM

rickier65

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline

As junk2drive said, creating the branches would be a pretty large undertaking. However, I would also like to see form of a branching capability, but I dont know that we have the resources to do that. But it is certainly something we could consider looking at. Maybe if the capability was there, the community would make use of it.

Thanks
rick

(in reply to junk2drive)

Post #: 3

RE: Feature Request - 8/6/2011 5:29:59 PM

notenome

Posts: 608
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline

Im fully aware the megas weren't random, its not what I meant. What I simply wanted was the ability for a scenario to lead to more than one other scenario, so Scenario1 instead of always leading to Scenario2 could lead to Scenario2a (if legendary or major victor) Scenario 2b (tactical victory or draw) Scenario 2c (marginal loss) etc. Just coding that functionality would be enough to allow the community to make amazing campaigns.

(in reply to rickier65)

Post #: 4

RE: Feature Request - 3/1/2012 1:17:38 PM

CSO_Talorgan