NMAS 12 Bravo scenario description error

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

NMAS 12 Bravo scenario description error

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Flashpoint Campaigns Series >> Tech Support >> NMAS 12 Bravo scenario description error

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

NMAS 12 Bravo scenario description error - 1/15/2014 12:18:39 AM

jenrick

Posts: 55
Joined: 1/10/2014
Status: offline

In the scenario description, 11 Bravo is used erroneously throughout rather than the correct MOS code of 12 Bravo.

-Jenrick

Post #: 1

RE: NMAS 12 Bravo scenario description error - 1/15/2014 1:15:01 AM

CapnDarwin

Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline

Yep.

Poor MR got beat up on that error a while back. I will check with him because I thought we had that fixed in one of the updates.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to jenrick)

Post #: 2

RE: NMAS 12 Bravo scenario description error - 1/15/2014 1:24:45 AM

jenrick

Posts: 55
Joined: 1/10/2014
Status: offline

The scenario title is correct, at least, he can take solace in that :)\

-Jenrick

(in reply to CapnDarwin)

Post #: 3

RE: NMAS 12 Bravo scenario description error - 1/15/2014 1:34:05 AM

Mad Russian

Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline

What I didn't take solace was changing the way the briefing read compared the my original and not changing the name of the scenario before it released.

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to jenrick)

Post #: 4