Flicker's Fabulous Strategy

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Flicker's Fabulous Strategy

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> Flicker's Fabulous Strategy

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 5:49:13 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

IAW forum guidance to "Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here" I'm posting this thread as a snapshot of my current game - Allies, June 1942. I hope that some of the gameplay descriptions help other players, and if someone has a critique or information I'd love to hear it. My game is going fairly well, and I'm pleased with my blossoming logistics setup.

I play one turn per day against the AI, and usually play one turn per day IRL, so it's almost like real time. I play 'active' China. A game can last for years, although I've declared victory early before since it felt like picking the wings off of flies.

In the first few months of the game I focused on making the Japanese pay for their wins, where possible, and on building a fallback / front line. I kept Singapore and Rangoon, Sumatra and Java, and Noumea. I lost, then regained Hong Kong, lost Port Moresby, much of the Philippines, Borneo, and much of the DEI. I am currently engaged with Japanese forces at Attu, Luganville, Cebu, Singapore, SE of Pegu, SW and SE of Wuchang, Pucheng, Hankow, Chengchow, Kaoping, and Paotow.

The Allies have 27,445 points versus the Japanese 11,035 points. Allied air losses are 1672 planes versus 4232 Japanese planes. Allied Army points are 3559 versus Japanese 4407. Finally, Allied sunk ships are 159 for 1214 points (average 8 point ship), versus Japan with 417 sunk ships for 4467 points (average 11 points).

Post #: 1

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 5:56:09 PM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

I see the results, but not the description of the fabulous strategy.

Edit: it's not like people would have much interest though :) It is common knowledge that you can kick the standard AI around however you like, when you know a couple patterns. Ending the game in 42 with bombed out Home Islands is pretty easy (getting the world conquered as Japan is trickier but can be done in 43).

The harder thing is to get a historically plausible game from the AI for some prolonged time.

< Message edited by GetAssista -- 8/1/2020 6:02:29 PM >

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 2

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 6:04:56 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Let's dig into shipping.

I 'rescued' as much shipping from Asia as I could in the early days of the Sir Robin plan, using xAKLs as passenger ships and collapsing to the DEI and eventually Colombo. I use a hub system built around repair yards. Soerabaja is a sub base. Tilitjap is the supply port for Java. Oosthaven and Sabang are the supply ports for Sumatra. Palembang supplies Singapore; I have a dedicated fleet at Palembang with all of the 1000 ton xAKL Coastal class ships escorted by the short-legged Dutch destroyers. I have a small joint Dutch / British Surface TF at Oosthaven.

The Burma Road is open. I have a dedicated fleet at Calcutta of the xAKL Pacific S class 1750 ton ships escorted by Indian DEs supplying Rangoon. I also run xAK Dominion M class 5500 ton ships to Rangoon or the Dutch from Colombo.

I run xAK Dominion L class 6400 ton ships from Cape Town to Colombo. The xAK Pacific M class 2900 ton ships are run from England to Cape Town, while the xAK Pacific L class 3900 ton ships run from the USA to Cape Town.

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 3

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 9:41:59 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Patience, dear readers.

To continue with shipping, Cape Town also supplies Perth using the long-legged xAK Euro K and xAK Euro L classes of ships (5600 / 200 and 7850 / 550 tons of supply / fuel, respectively). Each of the convoys described heretofore has at least a destroyer in the convoy. Convoys to risky areas usually get a BB, CA, or CL to soak up battle damage.

I have a British BB bombardment TF and accompanying CV fighter TF stationed at Colombo for raiding the west coast of Thailand and Malaysia, plus a small British SCTF at Colombo.

Fuel shipping is based in Abadan. Short-legged tankers convoy to Colombo accompanied by WW1 patrol boats. Long-legged tankers convoy to Perth.

Theater battle damage is repaired at Colombo; many ship upgrades are performed at Cape Town. Abadan has an AR and several AGs to handle routine repair, with Aden's repair yard available if needed.

I've got the remaining Dutch PT boats stationed at Batavia - they are helpful to disrupt enemy landings.

It took until Feb 1942 to get most of this scheme set up, and there are still stragglers making their way to their ports.

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 4

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 10:14:23 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Well, this is kind of a test. IMGUR changed their posting procedure since I last tried it:

https://imgur.com/a/HTeRnkG

< Message edited by Flicker -- 8/2/2020 7:16:00 AM >

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 5

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 10:15:00 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Hmm. Not what I wanted. I'll try again after dinner.

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 6

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 10:17:22 PM

Evoken

Posts: 488
Joined: 10/23/2019
Status: offline

I prefer gyazo , uploads screenshots you take instantly and easy to embed to forums

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 7

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 10:42:04 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Evoken - thanks for the recommendation. I forgot what I used before imgur, but free was important to me. I see that gyazo is free and developed by the Japanese. I don't know if I should trust them with this secret intel...

Trying again:

(in reply to Evoken)

Post #: 8

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 10:51:37 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

I usually abandon Singapore, then let the Japanese immolate themselves against the Dei. I don't lose Luzon but wipe out the Japanese there, I retake Hong Kong and send hundreds of thousands of supply there for the Chinese. The KB usually is wiped out by the end of the summer.

< Message edited by RangerJoe -- 8/1/2020 10:54:37 PM >

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 9

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 11:01:27 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

For some definitions of 'worked', that worked. I'll fiddle with the size for next time.

The image is of Sunk Ships as of ~42/06/12. Not just Japanese ships, all ships. My primary sub base is Soerabaja. All of the Dutch boats are home ported there, as well as American S-boats and USN fleet boats due to withdraw. The Dutch and the S-boats have working torpedoes. The Dutch O-boats patrol off Cam Ranh Bay and the K-boats patrol the Makassar Straits. The US S-boats are sent to ports that have enemy shipping docked. The US fleet boats are used as sub transports carrying supplies to Cebu (about to fall) and Zamboanga (the last stand for the PI). I converted the eligible US boats to SSTs when available, and they are just now coming into theater. I picked Zamboanga as the base to gather forces from Mindanao because they have light industry and resources.

Colombo is home to the small British sub fleet. They patrol the Malacca Strait.

Brisbane is home to US S-boats that are due to withdraw. When they (or the fleet boats) get to 120 days until withdrawal I start sending them to San Francisco. I have an RAN AS tender at Brisbane.

Pearl is home to the US fleet boats that do not withdraw. They patrol the Japanese Home Islands.

Every sub that doesn't withdraw has an aggressive captain. I'd like to credit Bullwinkle for guiding my thinking on sub tactics. When I started playing years ago, I used subs defensively. Subs are offensive weapons. Put them in the likely enemy sea lanes and let them do their work.

< Message edited by Flicker -- 8/1/2020 11:04:13 PM >

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 10

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/1/2020 11:42:16 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

You can withdraw from Sydney and Columbo as well.

Stay away from ports because of mines.

There is one mine that can only be laid by a US submarine that you converted - happy news I am sure.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 11

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 8:09:00 AM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Joe - thanks for the tip about withdrawing from Sydney and Colombo. I thought that ships had to withdraw from their nation's ports.

Good tips about mines, however I mostly don't send subs into unknown ports. Currently, my subs are busy transporting supplies, so I haven't used them yet as minelayers. Again, I'm stung by not digging into the upgrade paths and capabilities; I'll need to explore that sometime. I think I've depleted the pools of mines using CMs and DMs anyway.

To continue... I have a small RAN SCTF based at Perth, and another at Sydney. Melbourne is the upgrade repair yard for most ships, and there is a small cargo TF to pick up resources from Tasmania stationed there.

Pearl is the main combat port for the US Navy, and Christmas Island is a major supply / fuel hub and waypoint for convoys going to / from Australia. Seattle is the home port for the medium legged low capacity xAKL Lake class ships and TK Sun Type H class ships. Los Angeles is the home port for the rest of US classes of supply / fuel ships headed to Pearl, Sydney, or Auckland. After the 6/42 upgrades are complete (much of the US supply / fuel fleet), I'll adjust the US shipping process. Mare Island and Alameda are the major repair shipyards for long-duration repairs / upgrades (e.g. BBs). Seattle, San Francisco, and Los Angeles shipyards can be used for their home-ported fleets; Pearl is used for battle damage.

Fast troop transports are based at Cape Town (British), Aden (Dutch / Aussie), or San Francisco (US), with 'local' assault / reinforcement capacity at Colombo and Pearl (also a couple at Perth for Java; Sydney for SOPAC; and Auckland for SOPAC). I've got most of the ships that convert to LSIs or APAs stashed waiting on their conversions.

Each major port, where possible, has local ASW and Minesweeper capability (set to 'Remain on Station'), along with ASW patrols from KVs (id est Victoria for Seattle) or PCs (San Francisco) or AMs (Los Angeles). We'll discuss the air deployments later. AGPs are assigned to those home ports. ARs and AGs are deployed to receiving ports when feasible.

The two Lex class carriers are in an ACTF; so are the three Yorktown class carriers; the Wasp is currently transiting from Balboa. The old Lex class (1927) will provide security and amphibious support in the South Pacific (after the 6/42 upgrade), the Yorktowns (1937) are my offensive force, currently in SOPAC awaiting their 7/42 upgrade. The WASP (1940) will be assigned to NORPAC.

The type of ship that I probably underuse is the AV / AVP / AVD. I use the AVs that have seaplane capability for convoy escort and the rest just sit in port supporting seaplanes (that already have ground air support). I've read AARs that use AVs and seaplanes at super-secret bases for recon, but I haven't tried that yet.

My regulations require each ship to be upgraded in the month scheduled, unless allowed by waiver for an important mission. My regs also require Captains to be relieved of command upon reaching a port if involved in collisions or groundings.

I think that this setup provides a stable and effective foundation for supporting the upcoming campaigns.

Next up - air. Comments and criticisms are welcome - as you all know, there is always something more to learn in this game.

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 12

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 11:25:51 AM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

Use the smaller Lake class to move supplies from your larger supply bases to the smaller ports. That is a much more effective method of supplying those bases than using large ships that overwhelm the port facilities.

Short legged ships can carry supplies and fuel to Oahu or between the East Coast and Cape Town. The APs and AK can move supplies from the East Coast to Cape Town which would keep them safe until the Attack Upgrades.

A word about upgrades, there is one class that can be converted to AEs but not if they get upgraded. You need them more as AEs than any other ship. You will also need to convert ships to AKEs as well as AGs. The AGs can help repair the small ships as well.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 13

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 11:28:39 AM

Sardaukar

Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline

I use Midway as..well..midway-base for subs.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von B�lov, 1870-

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 14

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 2:14:16 PM

Jorge_Stanbury

Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline

the two Lex class carriers are in an ACTF; so are the three Yorktown class carriers; the Wasp is currently transiting from Balboa. The old Lex class (1927) will provide security and amphibious support in the South Pacific (after the 6/42 upgrade), the Yorktowns (1937) are my offensive force, currently in SOPAC awaiting their 7/42 upgrade. The WASP (1940) will be assigned to NORPAC.

against a human player, dividing the carriers and using them against obvious targets is a recipe for KB ambush = disaster. This typically gives Japan carrier superiority until mid to late 44 in the rare occasions the Allied player doesn't quit altogether

< Message edited by Jorge_Stanbury -- 8/2/2020 2:15:12 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Sardaukar)

Post #: 15

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 2:52:41 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

You can withdraw from Sydney and Columbo as well.

Stay away from ports because of mines.

There is one mine that can only be laid by a US submarine that you converted - happy news I am sure.

I have been working a stock scenario 1 mod using the editor. The US subs start out using the Mk. 10 mine and the Argonaut switches to the Mk. 12 early, but quite a few sub classes convert to carry the Mk. 12 in 1943-44.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 16

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 2:57:44 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Use the smaller Lake class to move supplies from your larger supply bases to the smaller ports. That is a much more effective method of supplying those bases than using large ships that overwhelm the port facilities.

Short legged ships can carry supplies and fuel to Oahu or between the East Coast and Cape Town. The APs and AK can move supplies from the East Coast to Cape Town which would keep them safe until the Attack Upgrades.

A word about upgrades, there is one class that can be converted to AEs but not if they get upgraded. You need them more as AEs than any other ship. You will also need to convert ships to AKEs as well as AGs. The AGs can help repair the small ships as well.

That is the C2 Lassen class. I think they start as 6200 or 6250 capacity xAKs and convert to 5400 capacity AEs. They become more important later on when the Iowa class arrive because you need a high capacity ammo ship to reload the Iowas.

A lot of Allied updates and conversions are restricted to "one or the other". Look at the options carefully before you allow the upgrade.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 17

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 3:04:18 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

I was thinking of doing some modding myself. I know that the USS Alden left the Pacific but the game does not show it. It was scrapped in 1944. Commander Ernest Evans MOH was on that ship in the DEI. That is why he attacked without orders to do so and launched torpedoes before he was ordered to. His ship blew the bow off the Kumano which was later sunked by air power. The Japanese saluted his crew in the water . . .

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 18

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 3:08:49 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

I was thinking of doing some modding myself. I know that the USS Alden left the Pacific but the game does not show it. It was scrapped in 1944. Commander Ernest Evans MOH was on that ship in the DEI. That is why he attacked without orders to do so and launched torpedoes before he was ordered to. His ship blew the bow off the Kumano which was later sunked by air power. The Japanese saluted his crew in the water . . .

Alden in the game is a four-stacker WWI design DD. Ernie Evans was commander of Fletcher DD USS Johnston (or Johnson). Is there a connection with Alden somewhere between the two?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 19

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 3:32:09 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

I was thinking of doing some modding myself. I know that the USS Alden left the Pacific but the game does not show it. It was scrapped in 1944. Commander Ernest Evans MOH was on that ship in the DEI. That is why he attacked without orders to do so and launched torpedoes before he was ordered to. His ship blew the bow off the Kumano which was later sunked by air power. The Japanese saluted his crew in the water . . .

Alden in the game is a four-stacker WWI design DD. Ernie Evans was commander of Fletcher DD USS Johnston (or Johnson). Is there a connection with Alden somewhere between the two?

Ernie Evans was on the Alden when war broke out, he was a junior officer. During the debacle in the DEI the four four-pipers fired their torpedoes and fled when the British and Ducth cruisers attacked and sunked. He was embarrassed. He was also half Cherokee and over one fourth Creek Indian but indentified as a Cherokee. He joined the US Navy as an enlisted man and was selected to go to Annapolis for a little more education. So his pride was burned for a few different reasons.

He later commanded the DD that attacked first at Leyte Gulf and went back to support the other DDs and DEs attacking - even though one engine was knocked out. 14 inch or 36cm shells went completely through the ship horizontally because they were armour piercing and there wasn't enough to slow them down to explode.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 20

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 5:09:54 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Joe, after the Jun upgrades, I'll redeploy the US cargo ships and tankers. NORPAC is pretty well supplied, and I have a bunch of tiny islands in SOPAC that could use some stuff.

Jorge, I created the ACTF using same-class ships because I think that I read somewhere that ACTFs should contain no more than four carriers to minimize aircraft coordination penalties (kinda manual p167). Since I have five carriers, a three carrier TF and a two carrier TF are used. Both ACTFs usually operate supporting each other, however the Lex class is headed for upgrade and the Yorktown class will be upgraded in July 1942.

All I know about Alden is that they make nice shoes.

Air.

Starting with the Dutch - I've got problems with the Dutch right now, as I'm running out of pilots. I've used up all of the replacements, reserves, and TRACOM. No squadron has reserve pilots, and several squadrons don't have a full complement of active pilots, although all planes are manned. The Dutch have performed well, and their on-the-job training has yielded some experienced pilots and fairly accurate bomb groups (~40% on average). I lost a lot of Dorniers while evacuating the outer DEI, and so have some upgraded Catalina squadrons. The Dorniers / Cats are spread out in Sumatra and Java. I run these planes at 30% search at 5000 feet, 10% train, and 20% rest.

Only squadrons at full strength are used - if any planes are being repaired, the unit trains at 90% until ready. I pretty much do this for all aircraft. I baby them unless there is an emergency (or opportunity). Also, if a squadron drops below 99% morale they train until morale is full.

The Dutch have two wings of remaining export Martin B-10 (WHs) and a wing of B-25C Mitchells to replace WH losses. They are set at Naval Attack when needed: 50% search at 5,000 feet and 30% rest. There are a few British and Aussie two-engine bombers in the DEI used the same way.

The small Dutch bombers are used as ASW set at 30% ASW at 1000 feet, 10% training, and 20% rest.

Dutch fighters are stationed at Soerabaja, Batavia, and Palembang. I may run out of pilots before I run out of planes. There are additional British (2), American (8), and Kiwi (1) fighters in the DEI and there is a USAAF bomber wing (B17E) at Lahat and a RAF bomber wing (Wellies and Blenheim IVs) at Prabo... um spelling. These bombers are set at Ground Attack to support the siege of Singapore: target Singapore at 6000 feet.

All fighters are set at Escort: 30% escort (2nd altitude performance band), 10% training, and 20% rest; unless action is imminent, in which case fighters are at 50% escort and 30% rest.

< Message edited by Flicker -- 8/2/2020 10:09:46 PM >

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 21

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 5:29:41 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

Escort planes should be set at the same altitude of the bombers.

Some Aussie air units fly Dutch aircraft and have a mix of pilots. One unit flies the B-25C.

The USS Alden is a flush deck, four piper DD.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 22

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/2/2020 6:28:46 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

I'm cheap, er frugal. While I'm on air generalities, air units due to withdraw are 'upgraded' to the oldest types of planes available, and their experienced pilots are transferred to Reserve; the squadron is withdrawn with only active pilots, no reserves. Sometimes the planes and pilots are returned to the pools, sometimes not - I don't know why.

I remember reading a comment years ago that someone would take the toilet paper from withdrawing ships if they could. I trade out ship captains if practical to save the good captains; I do the same for air and ground commanders. Air and ground units due to withdraw do not receive reinforcements.

PS. Joe, the 18th RAAF squadron flying B25C with Dutch pilots is at Soerabaja.

< Message edited by Flicker -- 8/2/2020 10:11:09 PM >

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 23

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/3/2020 10:21:59 AM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Air, continued...

The Brits have those units previously mentioned at Sumatra, plus a Hurricane PR2 squadron at Djambi providing Recon of Singapore. Rangoon is the Brits forward base, with Chittagong providing longer-range bomber support and replacement squadrons. Colombo is used as the base for Brit naval air. There are some Audax squadrons at major India ports for ASW. There is also a fighter squadron and Naval Search squadron at Port Blair (both due to permanently withdraw sometime).

The Brits also have a string of Lysander squadrons along the Burma Road (rail) for Recon. I don't remember where I read this, but I have the Lysanders set to Recon, but don't 'select target', Range 4 which I think allows them to randomly Recon within their 4 range radius.

India. The Indians have Wapiti squadrons at some west coast ports for ASW, the rest of their Air is Training at Calcutta.

There is a Multinational Airlift Wing at Ledo, composed of US, British, Dutch, and Chinese aircraft providing Air Transport to Tsuyang, China (which BTW is the historically accurate location).

The Chinese have a few fighter squadrons scattered about, however currently their major bases are at Changsha and Sinyang. The Chinese have a viable wing of SBIII bombers at Sinyang providing support to Hankow or Chengting, plus a mixed bomber wing of onesies providing Recon over Hankow.

There are a few short-legged I16 fighter squadrons 'trapped' at Urumchi. I think that in previous games I disbanded the squadrons allowing them to respawn at Chungking, but this time I'm building up the airfield at Urumchi to see if I can upgrade them and fly them out.

On to Oz. I use 2-engine bombers mostly for Naval Search or ASW (regardless of nationality), so there are 'teams' of Hudsons for Naval Search and Wirraways for ASW at Perth, Darwin, Melbourne, Townsville, and Brisbane. Fighters are scarce, so there are fighter squadrons at Darwin, Townsville, and Sydney. The naval roads around Sydney are infested by Japanese subs, so Newcastle, Sydney, and Port Kembla have a couple of wings of 2-engine bombers providing ASW, one of the wings is American. There are also American Dive Bombers scattered around the East Coast to respond to the occasional naval raid.

Charters Towers is home to a B17E bomber wing harassing Japanese-held Port Moresby.

Cairns is an air transport base providing supplies to beleaguered Horn Island, which has been isolated since the fall of Port Moresby.

Next, the US air.

< Message edited by Flicker -- 8/3/2020 10:22:44 AM >

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 24

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/3/2020 12:41:35 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

You will need enough supply at Urumchi to do the upgrade. Supply is always the issue in China ... you may have to disband the units and have them respawn in 120 days. Building Urumchi is a waste of supply if the Japanese are going to take it.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 25

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/3/2020 1:36:12 PM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flicker

... I don't remember where I read this, but I have the Lysanders set to Recon, but don't 'select target', Range 4 which I think allows them to randomly Recon within their 4 range radius...

Not from me.

Recon is a point to point mission. No such thing as an auto 4 hex range point to point.

Alfred

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 26

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/3/2020 1:42:21 PM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flicker

...There are a few short-legged I16 fighter squadrons 'trapped' at Urumchi. I think that in previous games I disbanded the squadrons allowing them to respawn at Chungking, but this time I'm building up the airfield at Urumchi to see if I can upgrade them and fly them out...

Has your "fabulous strategy" actually considered:

1. How much the cost to upgrade is and how likely you will have that sum to pay the bill.

2. What aircraft model option is available which will allow the unit to be flown out.

3. How deep your pools are to allow this "fabulous strategy" to be implemented.

Alfred

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 27

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/3/2020 1:48:59 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

You can fly them out. If they break down, having the last base with no aircraft start moving their base force anyway will eventually get to that base and repair them. Get all of the broken down planes into one squadron. Eventually they will get repaired and can make it to Chungking and eat Chop Suey there. Set them all to training. You can buy some out and get them to India and upgrade and train the units there.

Recon aircraft with no target set will randomly recon a base.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Alfred)

Post #: 28

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/3/2020 5:25:24 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

BBFanboy - I think Urumchi generates enough supply if I stockpile long enough (maybe I should start now :) I think that I must have disbanded them to respawn last game. The Japanese are not going to take Urumchi, deo volente. They haven't taken Paotow.

Alfred - thank you for clarifying the Recon question. I'll need to figure out a better use for those squadrons.

1. "cost to upgrade"??? Do these squadrons require PPs to upgrade? If so, then yes I'll have the PPs. I may not like it though.
2&3. There are three squadrons of 12 planes. I have 36 P43A-1 Lancers in the pool.

We haven't really gotten to the 'fabulous strategy' yet. I'm building the watch first, then we'll see what time it is...

Joe - I16-III have a max range of six. While the distance to Hami is six, the distance from Hami to Kiuchan is nine. I don't remember how I got them out last time I played.

Also, I set fighter escorts to the same altitude as bombers for bombing raids. I was generalizing when I wrote that fighters are set at their second-best maneuver band. Good point.

Also some more, I don't recall any enemy bases within range of the Lysanders. I must have misinterpreted that "randomly recon a base" capability for 'random recon of hexes'. Oops. Not the worst mistake I've made playing this game. Thanks.

< Message edited by Flicker -- 8/3/2020 5:28:46 PM >

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 29

RE: Flicker's Fabulous Strategy - 8/3/2020 6:59:56 PM

Flicker

Posts: 229
Joined: 11/24/2011
From: Rocket City USA
Status: offline

Before we get to the US Air discussion, let's talk about China some more.

I mentioned that I play active China. From Day One, China has been repairing Light Industry and Heavy Industry where needed, starting with Chungking. I also attacked where feasible and captured Canton and Hong Kong (both repaired for HI and LI). I captured Wuchang (unrepaired) and Kaoping. I have not repaired Nanning, Chagsha, or Wuchang; although Changsha is repairing LI. To repair industry in a city, I set 'stockpile' to 'Yes', then adjust the slider to oversupply the city. When the supply reaches 10,000 then you can expect one point of repair per day, mostly. Changsha will be repaired by about Xmas 1942. I am currently besieging Hankow (forts 5 as of my last attack. Ouch!) and I own all the hexsides. I also have a Japanese army trapped south of Wuchang (all hexsides, I hesitate to say surrounded because that has meaning). I have units blocking Japanese reinforcements. Chinese combat units have the best generals available. I am concerned about the Japanese siege of Chengchow; the terrain is not in my favor however my force is stronger than the attacker and I have forts (but not many anymore). Supply is a problem, but China moves at a slow pace. In order to break open the stalemate, I have an American infantry division on the way (Americal currently off Port Blair) with two Tank Battalions following. I hope that they can help defeat the Japanese in detail: Wuchang, Hankow, then Chengting. I anticipate them reaching Wuchang in about a month or so.

More on Urumchi; the base is at 4 of 7 Airfield and 41% expanding. I'll need an AF level 7 to upgrade. The option to disband for 120 days might be faster, but I wanted to try something different.

For those who warn "never get involved in a land war in Asia", I am Asia.

< Message edited by Flicker -- 8/3/2020 7:03:35 PM >

(in reply to Flicker)

Post #: 30