Alexandra
Posts: 546
Joined: 12/7/2000 From: USA Status: offline
|
I would think that the other problem with this idea is a simple one: what to simulate? The Chinese Civil War, Korea, and the various African and other third world civil wars can be done with SP: Waw. Any theoretical NATO-Warsaw Pact game will be just as biased towards the West as all the ones done in the past, so what's the point? Vietnam and Afghanistan aren't viable, as it's close to impossible to actually computer simulate a guerilla war. Post Cold War would be boring - unless, of course, you included more than military aspects to the game, but, how many Americans would buy a game that might accurate simulate how many civilians we've killed since 1990. The Arab-Israeli wars could be done, but, really, unless the Israeli player is very very good, given the number crunching way War Games must operate, the Arabs will win most of the time - which is a flaw is any war game where you are trying to simulate a massive numerical edge for one side. It's very hard to do. So, what do you have left? About the only conflict that might be able to be done, and that could be interesting to game out are the India-Pakisitan wars, and how big of a market do you have for them? IMO, it's not worth the money, effort, and time such a project would take. Alex
_____________________________
"Tonight a dynasty is born." Ricky Proehl, then of the Saint Louis Rams. He was right! Go Pats! Winners of Super Bowls 36, 38 and 39.
|