kaiser73
Posts: 394
Joined: 7/28/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tristanjohn quote:
ORIGINAL: kaiser73 Regarding the thread, you are free to play as you wish. as i am. as long as your opponent is fine with that, no problem. you use cause it is there to use. fine for me, as long as your opponent thinks the same. however, then don't go in other AAR and call player dumbs/gamey. when you do worse in your own matches. that is my only point. If you don't see as gamey using 70 LB from PM on night bombing in mid '42? please find me an example in RL . i personally never heard of. did you? Regarding Night bombing, your own AAR: 1st Night Bombing Used: 18 B17 Losses: 0 losses (3 damaged) Kills: 1 APD, 1 MSW, 1 APD, 40 men, 6 points on runway, 3 fighters 2nd Night Bombing: Used: ? Losses: o losses (8 damaged) Kills: 240 men, 4 guns, runway 14, Air supply 3, Airbase 4 3rd Night Bombing Used: 28 Losses: 2 losses (10 damaged) Kills: 177 men, 5 guns, runway 10, Airbase 5 4th Night Bombing Used: 12 Losses: 0 losses (3 damaged) Kills: 3 zeros 5th Night Bombing Used: 45 Losses: 0 losses (2damaged) Kills: 281 men, 5 zeros, runway 19, supply hits 4, airbase 7 6th Night Bombing used: 40 Losses: 0 (4 damaged) Kills: 555 men, 16 guns , airbase hits 3, supply 2, runway 29 7th Night Bombing used: 47 Losses: 2 (11 damaged) Kills: 121 men, 1 guns , airbase hits 2, supply 2, runway 8 8th Night Bombing used: 41 Losses: 2 (5 damaged) Kills: 225 men, 8 guns , airbase hits 2, supply 2, runway 8 9th Night Bombing used: 39 Losses: 0 (1 damaged) Kills: 33 men, 1 gun, 4 fighters 10th Night Bombing used: 38 Losses: 0 (3 damaged) Kills: 100 men, 1 guns , airbase hits 2, supply 1, runway 18, 26 aircrafts 11 Night Bombing used: 53 Losses: 0 (1 damaged) Kills: nothing 12 Night bombing used: 48 losses 2 (damaged 11) kills: 486 men, 9 guns, runway 27 13 Night bombing used: 66 losses 2 (damaged 9) kills: 5 men, 10 aircrafts killed 14 night bmbing: used: 64 losses: 0 (10 damaged) kills: 564 men, 18 guns Total Stats: Used: 569 Losses:10 (1,75%) Kills: 50 aircrafts, 2700 men These results are made in '42, bombing mostly a super AA base (according to your opponent). if you see nothing wrong with that then there is nothing to discuss about. i fail to see the super AA in these results you talking about. 1.75% losses...a joke. Exactly where are these results off? If you can't tell me that, specifically and with good historical documentation, you've got no case. As for the assets I use: there are plenty of B-17s in theater for me to use so I use them. What would you have me do, not use them? If George Kenney had had these bombers he'd have used them for sure, and probably to better effect than I've been able to achieve. I want to see if the model works. So I use what I've got and put that model through its paces. "Winning" the game is of no importance to me. I doubt you could say the same. As for the statistics you've quoted above: that's all bullshit. It's less than meaningless. You have no idea what losses I've actually incurred, or what the stand-down times are for my squadrons after they return from these missions. Same same for the situation over on the Japanese side of the board. You actually know nothing. So you're just essentially beating your gums. The "joke" is that Matrix actually listens to players of your ilk. You never know what you're talking about, you never bother to do a dime's worth of research, you don't put in two-cents worth of thought on this stuff before going into one of these rants, you just hold forth in the forum in round numbers and cause the developers to break down amid the noise you make and add new "features" and willy-nilly "tweak" others until "you people," who haven't a clue, stop whining about . . . all the things in the game system you don't understand and couldn't understand to begin with. So there. You keep coming at me with this foolishness and that's what you get. The bitter truth. I'm sorry I had to say it. Now please go away and play the game the way you wish to play it. I really don't care. I'm only here to try and make the game better. There's plenty to do in that regard, and from what I've seen you just can't help me. Thanks for the polite answer. Just do a test: put 100 aircrafts in an airfield lvl4. Put in that airfield lot of AA. then bomb it at night with your 70 night bombing raid. See how many you can kill. See how many you lose. Accuracy in killing aircrafts on field is very high. period. it brings the result that japan player is forced to move all aircrafts out of b-17 range. is it fun? is it historical? is it smart ? (since you called another player dumb to use a tactic far less gamey than this) Just answer me these questions: when Allied used 50-70 night bombing raids from PM ? do you think it is historical that Japan has to base out of B-17 range any aircraft? Lastly: i don't tell you how to play. as long as you agreed with your opponent, you can play how you want. However, given the fact you exploit weakness of the game in your own PBEMs, you should at least be honest enough to not jump in AAR threads of other people telling how much they are dumb/gamey. That is my point. The fact there is something in the game doesn't mean you need to use it. Don't know about you, but when i play i look for an historical match, a good opponent and a good challenge. I don't find fun using unhistorical unrealistic 100 b-17 bombing night raids in early '42. it takes no skill nor drawbacks. and it weaken Japan far more than happened in RL. Just as i don't go after Russia when i play Japan. your problem is that you play ONLY one side so you are unable to have an unbiased view. this game has some flaws. they are evenly split between the 2 sides. as long as they aren't fixed, it's up to players to use or not. Pesonally i look for a good game. a game where Allies can oblitarate any air asset based on airfield in range of b-17 isn't fun.
< Message edited by kaiser73 -- 4/19/2005 10:45:29 AM >
|