wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004 From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far... Status: offline
|
I have to clarify that the NABU type 14 was the BAD weapon in question. Cant find the exact source. The Taisho 14 was an improved 1904 Nambu. That is, it was improved by simplifying the design to facilitate production, but did nothing to the striker spring which which was to weak and remained a potential source of misfires (the desing even had a SPARE spring installed in the but). It had double recoil springs, plus a magazine retaining spring on later models, which made removing the magazine difficult under combat conditions. Its safety catch needed both hands to operate. Many officers, Japanese and doubtless some Chinese, were killed in action as a result of this poor design. Also, later in the war production quality became so bad that the weapon could even be fired with the safety on, dropping it, or even sqeezing the grip to tight............ (correct me if I am wrong)
_____________________________
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria. In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
|