SurrenderMonkey
Posts: 124
Joined: 10/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Gen.Hoepner The thread has gone on its own way However, i think the Iranians won't even have the time to use their possible warheads...they would be obliterated immediately after the "red button" had been pushed. The only thing that really concerns me, in terms of International Law, is that the when we, the western powers( yes, ok, the US and its vassals), decide that one country cannot have that kind of weapon, we say something like : it's our RIGHT to stop this procedure..... right???? well...If tomorrow Italy would decide( yes i know it won't but...) to have its own nuke, and someone, that already has it, would come up to me saying: "No, you cannot, because i don't want you to grow stronger as me"....well...believe me: i'd go really pissed off. That said i don't want Iran to have the nukes. If it was for me, Iran should had always been a British protectorate, like India, Pakistan etc etc... So i'm ok to stop the Iranian Nuclear program, i just don't like the way they defend their choices behind the words RIGHT or LAW...which are much more serious things. And the only way to keep them from having nukes - when all is said and done - is to DO something about it, however distasteful that may be. I don't like it any more than the next fella, but it's the hard, adult reality of the world. If you want to see what happens when everything is handled in the (powerless) courts (whether international or not) check out Rwanda, Bosnia, the Kurds, etc., et al, ad infinitum. "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." Winnie was right. (I think it was Winnie ... ?)
_____________________________
Wise Men Still Seek Him
|