Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

USA Destroyers pre-war classes

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> USA Destroyers pre-war classes Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/3/2006 5:12:29 PM   
kokubokan25


Posts: 1252
Joined: 7/19/2004
From: Iliaca, Spain
Status: offline 		And here are the USA pre-war classes, sent to rogue for posting:





Attachment (1)

_____________________________
Post #: 1
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/3/2006 5:51:58 PM   
ramc62

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 2/25/2006
Status: offline 		Thank you Fremen!!! Cant wait to put these into the game

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 2
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/3/2006 10:18:53 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline 		Nice fremen! Very Nice!!

Keep it up!!!!

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 3
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/3/2006 10:33:19 PM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		Out friggin standing!!!

Just keep an eye out on the scale.

< Message edited by Black Mamba 1942 -- 3/3/2006 10:34:05 PM >

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 4
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/3/2006 10:42:41 PM   
Halsey

 

Posts: 5069
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline 		Been in limbo for awhile.

These are spectacular!

_____________________________


(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 5
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/3/2006 11:31:25 PM   
kokubokan25


Posts: 1252
Joined: 7/19/2004
From: Iliaca, Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Black Mamba 1942


Just keep an eye out on the scale.


You right BM. I was thinking about this problem for a long time and (in my opinion) there were only two possibilities:
1-RESPECT the scale; in this case huge ships look good but small ships (like destroyers and minors) appear like tiny stain and the work on camos is useless...
2-RESPECT NOT the scale; the re-work on ships sides has a real value, however, in surface combats, with many ships of different sizes together, the battle vision is....a little strange.

Finally decide take the 2 option.

F




_____________________________


(in reply to Black Mamba 1942)
Post #: 6
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/3/2006 11:34:14 PM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		They'll probably look more to scale after you've finished redrawing every ship in the Art Folder.

Any chance that you might be able to tackle some of the CHS ships?
I'd like to see the Aquitania look like the Aquitania.
There's nothing sexier than an ocean liner in battleship gray.

< Message edited by Black Mamba 1942 -- 3/3/2006 11:40:29 PM >

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 7
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 4:34:37 AM   
33Vyper


Posts: 542
Joined: 10/20/2004
From: New Westminster BC
Status: offline 		Excellent work !!!!!!!

Love the new ship art

Aquatania??? is that a sister of the Lusitania?

(in reply to Black Mamba 1942)
Post #: 8
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 5:26:00 AM   
Andrew Brown


Posts: 5007
Joined: 9/5/2000
From: Hex 82,170
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fremen
1-RESPECT the scale; in this case huge ships look good but small ships (like destroyers and minors) appear like tiny stain and the work on camos is useless...
2-RESPECT NOT the scale; the re-work on ships sides has a real value, however, in surface combats, with many ships of different sizes together, the battle vision is....a little strange.

Finally decide take the 2 option.



My personal preference is option 1. I was thinking about adding some of these to CHS, but scale is an issue for me. I may still use some of the larger ships if that is OK?

Andrew

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 9
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 5:47:44 AM   
treespider


Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline
quote:

You right BM. I was thinking about this problem for a long time and (in my opinion) there were only two possibilities:
1-RESPECT the scale; in this case huge ships look good but small ships (like destroyers and minors) appear like tiny stain and the work on camos is useless...
2-RESPECT NOT the scale; the re-work on ships sides has a real value, however, in surface combats, with many ships of different sizes together, the battle vision is....a little strange.


I'm with Andrew and pick #1

_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to Andrew Brown)
Post #: 10
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 6:18:55 AM   
Cathartes

 

Posts: 2155
Joined: 1/5/2001
Status: offline 		Thanks for all your work re-vamping the ships. All have been outstanding--and I'm getting them as they come.

I think WITP's screen resolution and graphic constraints warp scale in almost every way--it seems futile to pursue it, so I like your approach to RESPECT NOT.

(in reply to treespider)
Post #: 11
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 10:11:38 AM   
kokubokan25


Posts: 1252
Joined: 7/19/2004
From: Iliaca, Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown


My personal preference is option 1. I was thinking about adding some of these to CHS, but scale is an issue for me. I may still use some of the larger ships if that is OK?

Andrew


Sorry read this Andrew but take a look on the follow jpeg. The dates are from CONWAY's ALL FIGHTING SHIPS.
And YES, the battleships, carriers, and cruisers i respect (if possible) the scale. The oversize on destroyers and minors (when available) is anyway, a little.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Andrew Brown)
Post #: 12
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 1:29:05 PM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		That's the resolution we need for WITPII!

Anyone approach you about using your graphics?

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 13
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 1:38:33 PM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 33Vyper

Excellent work !!!!!!!

Love the new ship art

Aquitania??? is that a sister of the Lusitania?


The Mauretania was Lusitania's sister ship.
She was scrapped in the mid-thirties.

Aquitania was a seperate class.
She was scrapped in 1950.



(in reply to 33Vyper)
Post #: 14
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 3:12:20 PM   
treespider


Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fremen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown


My personal preference is option 1. I was thinking about adding some of these to CHS, but scale is an issue for me. I may still use some of the larger ships if that is OK?

Andrew


Sorry read this Andrew but take a look on the follow jpeg. The dates are from CONWAY's ALL FIGHTING SHIPS.
And YES, the battleships, carriers, and cruisers i respect (if possible) the scale. The oversize on destroyers and minors (when available) is anyway, a little.







I think what Andrew and myself were referring to was to "RESPECT" the scale which your JPEG does do IMO and not necessarily follow it strictly..

The various images should convey an impression on the viewer such that DD's are substantial smaller than BB's. The images do not all have to be strictly to scale but ships with in the same class (DD, CL, CA, BB, CV etc.) should be illustrated in the same scale.

_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 15
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/4/2006 11:55:08 PM   
Andrew Brown


Posts: 5007
Joined: 9/5/2000
From: Hex 82,170
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: treespider
I think what Andrew and myself were referring to was to "RESPECT" the scale which your JPEG does do IMO and not necessarily follow it strictly..

The various images should convey an impression on the viewer such that DD's are substantial smaller than BB's. The images do not all have to be strictly to scale but ships with in the same class (DD, CL, CA, BB, CV etc.) should be illustrated in the same scale.


That is indeed what I meant, and I think the original game graphics scale is OK.

(in reply to treespider)
Post #: 16
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 12:13:29 AM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		That's what I was trying to imply also.

They don't have to be perfectly scaled.
Just as long as a CA/CL looks smaller than a BB.
And DD's looks smaller than CA/CL's.

The Japanese CV's look very good in this respect, and so do the Allied BB/CV's .

As a note, even if they aren't, I'll still keep using them.
They are extremely good looking.

(in reply to Andrew Brown)
Post #: 17
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 1:36:04 AM   
kokubokan25


Posts: 1252
Joined: 7/19/2004
From: Iliaca, Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown

quote:

ORIGINAL: treespider
I think what Andrew and myself were referring to was to "RESPECT" the scale which your JPEG does do IMO and not necessarily follow it strictly..

The various images should convey an impression on the viewer such that DD's are substantial smaller than BB's. The images do not all have to be strictly to scale but ships with in the same class (DD, CL, CA, BB, CV etc.) should be illustrated in the same scale.


That is indeed what I meant, and I think the original game graphics scale is OK.


All right, i understand. The answer is YES. The scale between ships of the same class (DD, CL, etc) is correct in my reworks.

_____________________________


(in reply to Andrew Brown)
Post #: 18
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 1:44:58 AM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		YOU ARE THE MAN!!!

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 19
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 2:21:35 AM   
Andrew Brown


Posts: 5007
Joined: 9/5/2000
From: Hex 82,170
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fremen
All right, i understand. The answer is YES. The scale between ships of the same class (DD, CL, etc) is correct in my reworks.


Actually I just re-read Treespider's comment and I made an error - I don't just mean that the scale between ships of the same class should be correct, but that DDs should be appreciably smaller than CAs which should be appreciably smaller than BBs. Not to the same scale - as then they might be too small - but appreciably smaller. The place where this would be most noticeable would be on the surface combat screen, where the different ships appear together.

Correct me if I am wrong, but to me your DDs, for example, are larger than the equivalent DDs in the original art. My preference would be for the DDs to be the same size as the original ones. I realise that if that was done detail would be lost, but that is my personal preference. If I am in the minority, which is most likely, then too bad for me.

Andrew

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 20
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 2:45:04 AM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		Didn't Subchaser show that larger art palettes could be used?

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to Andrew Brown)
Post #: 21
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 2:56:58 AM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		183x183 dpi on the animation sides changes the size by 1/2.
Save options, retain dimensions and reset the dpi to 182.
I remember this from messing around with JWE's graphics.

What are yours set on fremen?
This could be a quick fix for anyone wanting smaller ships.

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 22
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 7:40:59 AM   
rogueusmc


Posts: 4583
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Status: offline 		http://witp.tylerroguedesigns.com/new.htm

They are up.

_____________________________

There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army


(in reply to Black Mamba 1942)
Post #: 23
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 10:02:07 AM   
kokubokan25


Posts: 1252
Joined: 7/19/2004
From: Iliaca, Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Black Mamba 1942

183x183 dpi on the animation sides changes the size by 1/2.
Save options, retain dimensions and reset the dpi to 182.
I remember this from messing around with JWE's graphics.

What are yours set on fremen?
This could be a quick fix for anyone wanting smaller ships.


183x183 dpi is the size of the Shil file.


_____________________________


(in reply to Black Mamba 1942)
Post #: 24
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 1:10:07 PM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		Thanks!
I might play around with it some.

Keep up the good work!

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 25
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 1:46:18 PM   
kokubokan25


Posts: 1252
Joined: 7/19/2004
From: Iliaca, Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Black Mamba 1942

Thanks!
I might play around with it some.

Keep up the good work!


I'll do. Thanks for your support!!



_____________________________


(in reply to Black Mamba 1942)
Post #: 26
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/5/2006 11:33:23 PM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		Im finding another bonus to having different backgrounds.

It's making it easier to keep the same classes together when I form a new TF.

(in reply to kokubokan25)
Post #: 27
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/6/2006 12:22:03 AM   
grraven2004


Posts: 273
Joined: 3/4/2004
From: Cuyahoga Falls OH
Status: offline 		Will these work with Nik's mod 5.02 and using AB's 5.01 map?

_____________________________

Human by birth

Klingon By choice!

Sig changed per Erik's request

(in reply to Black Mamba 1942)
Post #: 28
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/6/2006 12:54:29 AM   
Black Mamba 1942


Posts: 510
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline 		Yup.
Any scenario or map.

(in reply to grraven2004)
Post #: 29
RE: USA Destroyers pre-war classes - 3/6/2006 1:22:42 AM   
grraven2004


Posts: 273
Joined: 3/4/2004
From: Cuyahoga Falls OH
Status: offline 		SWEET!!!!
Thanks BM 1942

_____________________________

Human by birth

Klingon By choice!

Sig changed per Erik's request

(in reply to Black Mamba 1942)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> USA Destroyers pre-war classes Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.438