Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Who wants to fly this

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> Who wants to fly this Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Who wants to fly this - 4/20/2006 5:06:12 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Yuck






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Post #: 1
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/20/2006 5:32:27 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
what no takers ?

if I not mistaken, that is the plane that got the first GB air kill of the war !

knocked down a Ju 88, odd part is the Ju 88 was faster :)

oh well

well then how about this






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 2
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/20/2006 9:07:48 PM   
Capt Cliff


Posts: 1791
Joined: 5/22/2002
From: Northwest, USA
Status: offline
Where's the T-Bolt? When you absolutely have to take something to take into combat, and can be sure to make it home!

_____________________________

Capt. Cliff

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 3
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/20/2006 9:10:19 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
I not got a view of one of those yet :)



_____________________________


(in reply to Capt Cliff)
Post #: 4
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/20/2006 10:51:11 PM   
daveballmh

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2006
Status: offline
Hard

I think you may be wrong. That aircraft is Blacburn Roc which is a turret fighter version of the Blackburn Skua - a sort of naval rival to the Boulton Paul Defiant, but a lot slower.

I think the first kill might have been by a Blackburn Skua, which was primarily a dive bomber but was also used as a fighter at times. The irony is that the Skua was about 20mph faster than the Roc

Dave

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 5
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/20/2006 11:12:17 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Yeah, the Skua got the first confirmed FAA kill of the war.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to daveballmh)
Post #: 6
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/21/2006 4:23:36 AM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Sorry Had it backwards

but still, both are butt ugly, and slower then the planes they were facing :)



_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 7
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/22/2006 7:59:43 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
more planes, only a mother could love




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 8
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/23/2006 3:56:30 PM   
HMSWarspite

 

Posts: 1401
Joined: 4/13/2002
From: Bristol, UK
Status: offline
Nah - you haven't even got close to ugly yet...Hampden, Whitley are both not pretty, and if you go beyond BTR, try the Boulton Paul Overstrand (left service 1940-1 so almost counts!). But my personal favourite - the Baracuda.

Of course, some of the interwar flying boats...

_____________________________

I have a cunning plan, My Lord

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 9
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/25/2006 2:10:09 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Twins




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to HMSWarspite)
Post #: 10
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/25/2006 3:14:52 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
Aren't they pretty

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 11
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/26/2006 1:54:10 AM   
langley


Posts: 183
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Newbury, Berkshire, England.
Status: offline
Give me the Westland Whirlwind II anyday!

MJT

_____________________________

"My God, I hope you don't blame me for this. I had no idea where you were."
Air Vice-marshal Pulford upon the loss of "Force Z"

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 12
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/26/2006 4:56:27 AM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
I confused
I only got a Mk1 and a Mk1a

?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to langley)
Post #: 13
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/26/2006 8:58:59 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
now here is a pretty one






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 14
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/26/2006 9:07:23 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
of course, some people have no taste




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Hard Sarge -- 4/26/2006 9:08:16 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 15
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/26/2006 9:09:20 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
of course, some people like to use skill when they fly




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 16
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/26/2006 10:27:42 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Of course, some people should get around to releasing these games toute suite!

< Message edited by Terminus -- 4/27/2006 9:39:47 PM >


_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 17
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/26/2006 11:01:12 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
<agrees with Terminus>

I just bought BII to keep me busy while I wait !!!!

Come on guys hurry up !!!!

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 18
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/26/2006 11:49:13 PM   
langley


Posts: 183
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Newbury, Berkshire, England.
Status: offline
The Westland Whrilwind MkII

In December 1940 production of the Peregrine engine was due to be stopped!
By January 1941 Westland had done some redesign work to allow 2 x Merlin 20 Engines to be fitted to the airframe.

These would of given the aircraft Outstanding Performance. The estimates for this performance are as Follows:-
Top speed 410mph
Service Ceiling 37,000ft
Range 800miles

Given that the modifactions to fit merlin 20 engines were mainly to sort out undercarriage retraction problems it appears this Version could well of been in service mid to late 1941!

How well would they done flying against the Fw 190 is hard to say but it would of being intresting.

There was even talk of a Whirlwind with an American Engine (Alison Engine?)

As it was the Westland Whirlwind II never went into Production The powers that be felt that the new Hawker Fighter with six 20mm Cannon and a single engine was a better bet.

The Name of this Great Hawker Fighter was the Typhoon and it never did fly with six cannons.

Most of this information was taken from The Westland Whirlwind Fighter by Victor Bingham.

MJT


_____________________________

"My God, I hope you don't blame me for this. I had no idea where you were."
Air Vice-marshal Pulford upon the loss of "Force Z"

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 19
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/27/2006 5:42:49 AM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Okay, I follow now

I had the figher model and the fighter bomber model, that is why I was confused by the Mk II

another one that got to make you shake your head, was the P-38 with merlins, the test model was great, and it was figured out it would take about 2 weeks to reset the production lines, the higher ups figured they needed the 2 weeks production more then they needed a better plane type !



_____________________________


(in reply to langley)
Post #: 20
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/27/2006 5:52:14 AM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Of course, some people should get around to releasing these game toute suite!


ahh come on guys, not fair

not sure anyone knows how much work this really is

which I think we are closer then we had hoped, but we not ready yet

I would say though, that I work my normal job, and that is close to 7 days a week, I work on the game more then I go to work

we getting there :)



_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 21
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/27/2006 9:38:54 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

ahh come on guys, not fair

not sure anyone knows how much work this really is

which I think we are closer then we had hoped, but we not ready yet

I would say though, that I work my normal job, and that is close to 7 days a week, I work on the game more then I go to work

we getting there :)



For what it's worth, I know exactly how much work this is, having beta'ed WPO. I was mostly pulling on your leg... Mostly...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 22
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/27/2006 9:40:26 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
One thing, though, could we pretty please not have any plane sides with the undercarriage down in the game? Aside from the Stuka and the Gladiator, they look like warmed-over cr*p...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 23
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/28/2006 12:47:18 AM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
T........can it.....we'll get it ready when it is....you have SP turns to do for me first anyhow

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 24
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/28/2006 1:52:16 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Don't make me trot out my Cossacks, silly person from Reading...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 25
RE: Who wants to fly this - 4/28/2006 7:39:37 PM   
Howard Mitchell


Posts: 449
Joined: 6/3/2002
From: Blighty
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

Yuck








Here’s an extract from a book about the Defiant and the Roc called ‘The Turret Fighters’ by Alec Brew, published by Crowood. The Roc saw almost no action, but here is one of the few examples of when it did:

“A well known engagement involved a 2 AACU (Anti-Aircraft Co-operation Unit) ROC, L3085, and Plt Off D. H. Clarke, who had painted a red ‘Saint’ (the Leslie Charteris character) in a red-framed yellow diamond on each side of the rear fuselage of his ‘own’ Roc. On 26 September 1940 he was sent out to search for survivors in the water 15 miles (24 km) south-west of St Catherines Point. With Sergeant Hunt in the gun turret – which, unusually for 2 AACU Rocs, was fully armed – he took off in the late afternoon. As he instituted a square search in the area indicated, he noticed what he thought was a Swordfish also searching about 3 miles (5 km) away.

After about 45 minutes of fruitless search in the gathering gloom, he suddenly noticed that the Swordfish, now only half a mile away, was in fact a twin engined floatplane. Out of curiosity, wondering what it was, he flew towards it: and then suddenly realised it was a Heinkel He 59, a German aircraft probably on the same air-sea rescue task as himself. Unsure as to whether he should open fire on an aircraft on such a humanitarian mission, he flew across its nose with Hunt training his turret at it.

As he did so the German nose gunner opened fire with his 7.9mm machine gun, and Hunt returned fire, his tracer pouring into the Heinkel’s fuselage. After the pandemonium and shock of his first action, Clarke swung on to a parallel course, and re-established communication with Hunt , whose intercom lead had been pulled out. The Heinkel turned for France, skimming the waves. Happily the twin engined bi-plane was even slower than the Roc, with a top speed at sea level of only 137 mph (220 kph), and Clarke was able to gain on his adversary; although he was still faced with the prospect of having to drop a wing to enable Hunt to open fire, even though his propeller was skimming the wave tops.

At 300 yards range he dropped a wing, and Hunt opened fire with another broadside. The Heinkel replied from all three gun positions, nose, dorsal and ventral, a single machine gun in each, but Clarke had to lift the wing after only a few seconds to avoid side-slipping into the sea, causing the last few rounds of Hunt’s burst to shoot harmlessly up into the air. The two aircraft continued these brief exchanges of fire for about 25 minutes, until the coast of France was looming up. Both aircraft were hit, and one of the Heinkel’s gunners stopped firing; but just as Clarke was about to turn away, the Roc was hit in the engine.

It faltered, and Clarke switched to the reserve 17 gal (77 ltr) tank, pulling up and away. Just as he thought he might have to ditch, the Perseus picked up, and he nursed the damaged aircraft back to Gosport. But before he could taxi in the engine stopped, out of fuel. Clarke claimed the Heinkel as ‘Damaged’.

On his return his groundcrew found two incendiary bullets in the main fuel tank, above which he sat. They had entered low down in the petrol, which had extinguished them; slightly higher, in the explosive fuel/air mixture above, and the Roc would have been ‘missing in action’. This action was almost certainly the nearest the Blackburn Roc ever came to destroying a German aircraft in combat”.


It is comforting to know that if the Germans had ever tried a massive low-level attack on Great Britain using twin engined float bi-planes, the Roc was there, ready and waiting to see them off.


< Message edited by Howard Mitchell -- 4/28/2006 7:41:37 PM >


_____________________________

While the battles the British fight may differ in the widest possible ways, they invariably have two common characteristics – they are always fought uphill and always at the junction of two or more map sheets.

General Sir William Slim

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 26
RE: Who wants to fly this - 6/3/2006 12:24:00 AM   
daveballmh

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2006
Status: offline
If you want a fighter even slower than the normal Roc, try the thrid prototype which was fitted with twin floats!

(in reply to Howard Mitchell)
Post #: 27
RE: Who wants to fly this - 6/30/2006 1:39:12 AM   
Lemurs!


Posts: 788
Joined: 6/1/2004
Status: offline
I want to fly Do335. I got to see one restored Do335. Sweet as all get out. Damn nice plane.

Mike


_____________________________



(in reply to daveballmh)
Post #: 28
RE: Who wants to fly this - 6/30/2006 3:45:07 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
is it actually operational??

_____________________________


(in reply to Lemurs!)
Post #: 29
RE: Who wants to fly this - 9/25/2006 12:00:23 AM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
it may be a lead slead, but it is a sweet lead slead




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> Who wants to fly this Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.422