Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Batting Averages

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> PureSim Baseball >> Batting Averages Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Batting Averages - 6/19/2006 1:29:06 AM   
Cringer

 

Posts: 69
Joined: 6/5/2006
Status: offline 		Ok, here is my career....

Started in 1902, it is a fictional league/players.

I have not seen a single player hit for over .350 in over 20 years of the league now. The highest is actually the low .340's. Obviously this is a bit irregular when compared to 'real life' baseball.

I am not a huge fan of messing with sliders much (in any game). I am wondering though if others have had to do so to get batting averages up. I don't want the whole league's averages to go up though, and that is my dilema here. I just want to see some .360, .380 seasons from guys. Maybe even someone flirting with .400.
Post #: 1
RE: Batting Averages - 6/19/2006 3:38:46 AM   
henry296

 

Posts: 418
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Just finished my 1928 season (real players) and the highest Batting average record was set at 369 by Jim Bottomley.  The previous record had been 368 by Babe Ruth.

By the way in 1927 Ruth hit 68 homeruns.  Some of that might be using the current Yankee Stadium Configuration instead of a more historical version.

(in reply to Cringer)
Post #: 2
RE: Batting Averages - 6/19/2006 3:42:54 AM   
Claymore Cut


Posts: 270
Joined: 5/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: henry296

Just finished my 1928 season (real players) and the highest Batting average record was set at 369 by Jim Bottomley.  The previous record had been 368 by Babe Ruth.

By the way in 1927 Ruth hit 68 homeruns.  Some of that might be using the current Yankee Stadium Configuration instead of a more historical version.



In my 1927 League, Ruth hit .368 (he hit .356 in 27) and knocked in 61 Home Runs (60 in 27).

He however crapped out in the WS, hitting .280 with 4 Homeruns (he was hitting less than .200 with 1 HR through the first 4 games, but he turned it on in the final two, the Yanks ended up losing to the Giants in 6).

(in reply to henry296)
Post #: 3
RE: Batting Averages - 6/19/2006 5:43:03 AM   
Cringer

 

Posts: 69
Joined: 6/5/2006
Status: offline 		I wonder if being a fictional league has helped keep the BA's down for me? I have a guy who has been at or floated near 100 for both contact and eye, so I know it's not the player ratings themselves. Not sure what else it could be. Not a killer though, it's just a slightly different baseball world for me which makes it fun.

(in reply to Claymore Cut)
Post #: 4
RE: Batting Averages - 6/19/2006 5:52:51 AM   
SittingDuck

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 9/1/2002
Status: offline 		I was just about to post that - I find fictional leagues just don't have the top mind-blowing stat leaders.  I've posted about this for years, but now I think it is just fictional.  Apparently historical leagues do work properly this way.

Not sure how to change that or why it is happening.  But we need those stand-out stat seasons to make the record books come alive.

Viva Le Fictionalie!!

(in reply to Cringer)
Post #: 5
RE: Batting Averages - 6/19/2006 6:11:16 AM   
lynchjm24

 

Posts: 240
Joined: 8/21/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SittingDuck

I was just about to post that - I find fictional leagues just don't have the top mind-blowing stat leaders.  I've posted about this for years, but now I think it is just fictional.  Apparently historical leagues do work properly this way.



I think that 07 is better in this respect. By being able to have players decline at a later age I'm finding higher career totals, and I'm finding more outliers in single seasons in this version then in older versions. Don't know if it was be design or if it just started to happen on it's own.

(in reply to SittingDuck)
Post #: 6
RE: Batting Averages - 6/19/2006 2:51:23 PM   
SittingDuck

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 9/1/2002
Status: offline 		Hey Jim!

Btw, what is an 'outlier'? Do you mean someone like Nolan Ryan w/ his 300+ K seasons?

(in reply to lynchjm24)
Post #: 7
RE: Batting Averages - 6/20/2006 2:03:30 AM   
lynchjm24

 

Posts: 240
Joined: 8/21/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SittingDuck

Hey Jim!

Btw, what is an 'outlier'? Do you mean someone like Nolan Ryan w/ his 300+ K seasons?


That's what I'm getting at. Older versions of Puresim had bunches of guys at the top of leaderboards - this version seems better at separtation for a few stars.

(in reply to SittingDuck)
Post #: 8
RE: Batting Averages - 6/20/2006 2:16:14 AM   
SittingDuck

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 9/1/2002
Status: offline 		Interesting.  Are we talking historical and fictional, or just historical that you see this?

(in reply to lynchjm24)
Post #: 9
RE: Batting Averages - 6/20/2006 3:04:30 AM   
lynchjm24

 

Posts: 240
Joined: 8/21/2005
Status: offline 		I only play fictional - can't talk about historical.

(in reply to SittingDuck)
Post #: 10
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> PureSim Baseball >> Batting Averages Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.938