risk_doc
Posts: 21
Joined: 5/7/2006 Status: offline
|
Depends upon how much of a "statistical outlier" was the actual season that was played. Did the most talented team win it all or was there a variety of random factors (weather, injuries, etc.) that contributed to the eventual results. Also, Prosim does allow you to replicate general manager styles, but does is there enough error in the AI manager versus the real manager to cause a divergence in results? In sports, the most talented team does not always win the championship. However, the central limit theorem would suggest that after a large number of simulated seasons, the average results should show the most talented team (on paper) coming out on top most of the time. For example, the 1985 Royals were not even close in terms of being the most talented team on paper; however, due to a variety of circumstances (team chemistry, luck, Dick Howser, George Brett's incredible performance in the playoffs, Don Denkinger) they won the World Series. If you simulate that season several times, you will probably find that the Royals won't win the AL West the majority of the time. The California Angels were probably the most talented team in the division (as proved out during the following season). The beauty of team sports is the intangibles that go into the results. A game that faithfully recreated each and every actual season's results would be a very dull game to play in my honest opinion. The beauty of Puresim, is that each time you resimulate even a single season (say 1985 for example), it is a whole new ballgame. Sure, there will be teams that don't have much of a chance (i.e., the '85 Pirates) but each season is a new start with the potential for new results.
|