Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Submarine Amour

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Submarine Amour Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 12:46:12 AM   
MarcA


Posts: 1181
Joined: 3/2/2005
From: England
Status: offline
I notice all subs have 0 armour everywhere. Don't the pressure hulls of subs have substantial thickness just to survive the effects of pressure at depth? Wouldn't this give all subs some armour factor.

(I must say I have no idea how thick a sub hull is)

_____________________________

Post #: 1
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 12:55:35 AM   
wild_Willie2


Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline
Subs are build to endure water pressure, NOT to prevent shells from penetrating.
Although its diving body is made of steel, this is not the hardend steel used in armour. 

ANY penetrating shell in it's primary dive body will render a sub virtually useless. When the primary divebody has been compromised it will be unable to withstand any degree of water pressure without catastrophic failure. 

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to MarcA)
Post #: 2
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 1:04:10 AM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
100% concur with WW.

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 3
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 1:27:00 AM   
bbbf

 

Posts: 493
Joined: 7/16/2000
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline
What, you don't want to crash dive in a sieve?

Wimps!

_____________________________

Robert Lee

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 4
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 1:39:36 AM   
wild_Willie2


Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline
Well it WOULD improve your crashdive time average.
Like they say, the fastest laptime for an engine is the round before it goes boom...

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to bbbf)
Post #: 5
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 2:05:10 AM   
MarcA


Posts: 1181
Joined: 3/2/2005
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

Subs are build to endure water pressure, NOT to prevent shells from penetrating.
Although its diving body is made of steel, this is not the hardend steel used in armour.

ANY penetrating shell in it's primary dive body will render a sub virtually useless. When the primary divebody has been compromised it will be unable to withstand any degree of water pressure without catastrophic failure.


Thanks Willie

I thought it would be something like that

_____________________________


(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 6
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 2:56:01 AM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
FWIW, the "durablity" of a sub is not it's submerged disp (as suface ships it is a ratio of displacement), but rather it's dive depth divided by 10 (roughly)...

-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to MarcA)
Post #: 7
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 3:14:31 AM   
Tiornu

 

Posts: 1126
Joined: 4/1/2004
Status: offline
Submarine love? I don't think that's legal in this state.
The British felt that you needed a 4in gun to give a submarine hull a good thumping. It may be the long American 3in gun was adequate.

(in reply to MarcA)
Post #: 8
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/1/2006 8:45:39 PM   
rokohn

 

Posts: 32
Joined: 8/4/2006
From: California
Status: offline
With submarine steel, ductility (ability to bend and absorb a shock) is more important than the hardness (ability to resist penetration).  Hardness and ductility are mutually exclusive properties in steel.

Armor plating for the side belts on BBs and CAs is actually a compound material.  The part of the plate facing out has been impregnated with carbon (the cementing process) leaving a surface with a very high hardness and strength but no ductility (think of glass).  The back of the plate is left alone, leaving a backing of high ductility but lower strength.  The plating will break up the smaller incoming shells on the hard surface.  But any shell powerful enough to get past the hard surface of the plate, will be slowed down by the back half as the plate absorbs the impact of the shell. (Actually 80-90% of the plate thickness is ductile).  If possible, the shell will be slowed enough so that it will not bust through the plate intact and will explode while in the plate, minimizing damage.

With Battleships, there is enough room for defense in depth and there will be additional armor plating several feet away from the first (primary) armor plate.  This is to stop the remains of the bursting shell, or to slow the shell again if it breaks through the primary plate.  Remember that the timer in the shell is counting down to the time it will explode, (we are talking milliseconds here) therefore, by slowing the shell  down you will increase the chance that the shell will explode before it gets into the "meat" of the ship.  A feature of the internal primary plate of the Iowa's, is that the hull plating will strip away the windscreen of the shell and start the timer before the shell ever hits the primary armor plate.

The armor plating used on decks will not have the hardened (cemented) surface.  Bombs are not armor piercing the same way shells are, (which allows for a much greater bursting charge in a bomb), so the armor deck is designed to slow the bomb down (or stop completely) as it goes through the ship.

In the case of the submarine, the hull must bend and contract as the pressure increases requiring a material of good ductility.  The strength of the plating is increased by alloy additions, as opposed to heat-treating for high hardness.

As a submarine skipper, I would not be worried about a belt of 50 cal. or drum of 20mm rounds, but a good dose of 40mm would give me pause to worry.  (I will ignore range considerations for the nonce)

_____________________________

Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
. . .
Do not rebuke a mocker or he will hate you;
rebuke a wise man and he will love you.
Instruct a wise man and he will be wiser still;
teach a righteous man and he will add to his learning.

(in reply to Tiornu)
Post #: 9
RE: Submarine Amour - 11/2/2006 12:05:54 AM   
Tiornu

 

Posts: 1126
Joined: 4/1/2004
Status: offline
None of the Japanese cruisers (unless we go back to armored cruisers!) had face-hardened armor. No American cruisers had it before the Brooklyn class, some units of which did while others didn't. Wichita and all subsequent cruisers (except for the Atlanta types) had face-hardened armor.
The outer hull plating of the Iowa and SoDak classes is not very useful for decapping. The excitement that this idea caused a few years ago has been muffled by subsequent research. But it's not that important--most Japanese shells that hit the Iowa belt would be exceeding their proofing limits anyway.
An oddity: most battleship turrets had face-hardened faceplates and homogenous roofs, but the Americans used homogenous faceplates for their modern ships and the Japanese used face-hardened roofs.

(in reply to rokohn)
Post #: 10
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Submarine Amour Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.859