golden delicious
Posts: 5575
Joined: 9/5/2000 From: London, Surrey, United Kingdom Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dayrinni Thank you very much. My next question is: In the FiTE I am doing, there are units part of a division. Say: The 12th HQ, the 12th 1st Infantry Rgt and then the 12th 2nd Infantry Rgt. Are there any negatives to having them split up or does it matter if divisions and stay together? The same with the HQ units? The primary significance of formations is that the units of a formation always have full co-operation with one another. Otherwise co-operation depends on formation support levels. In this particular scenario, I believe formation support levels are very high (you can check in the formation report). As such, formation cohesion isn't very important. Formations are also used as one way of reflecting the disruptive effects of heavy losses (or other factors, through the shock event); sometimes the whole thing will go into reorganisation. This represents a disincentive to formation cohesion, as a dispersed formation will be unlikely to suffer enough losses in one turn to suffer this effect, and should it do so the effects will not be concentrated in one area, so you won't be totally paralysed in one section of the line.
_____________________________
"What did you read at university?" "War Studies" "War? Huh. What is it good for?" "Absolutely nothing."
|