Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RL Q regarding Band of Brothers

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RL Q regarding Band of Brothers Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/26/2007 11:51:49 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline 		Hi all,

Just watched an episode of Band of Brothers (Day of Days) whilst eating dinner and I wondered something.

It says the attack on Brecourt Manor guns is still taught today at West Point as a textbook assault on a fixed position.

Can you Military guys confirm if that is the case or not?

Thanks

< Message edited by Speedy -- 1/27/2007 12:21:31 AM >

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Post #: 1
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/26/2007 11:59:49 PM   
wolffpack

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 7/16/2004
Status: offline 		Talked to a couple of west pointers in my unit when it first came out and they said it was. That was awhile back tho. Don't know about now.

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 2
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/27/2007 2:19:15 AM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline 		It is a classic of small unit tactics. It is taught and appreciated, not only at Hudson High, but anywhere people wear the the little oblong blue badge with the flintlock & wreath.

XVII ABC was using it as an exercise at Bragg at least till 1969. I recall my TacO saying only 1 in 50 classes were ever successful. Mine sure wasn't. Makes you appreciate men like Winters don't it?

JWE

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 3
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/27/2007 2:34:20 AM   
patrickl


Posts: 1530
Joined: 6/20/2002
From: Singapore
Status: offline 		Hi,

Found this on the web - map and the battle sequence.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-vetscor/1062013/posts

Pat

_____________________________


Banner designed by rogueusmc

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 4
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/27/2007 3:28:01 AM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: patrickl

Hi,

Found this on the web - map and the battle sequence.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-vetscor/1062013/posts

Pat

Thanks to Patrickl for that. If you do the wargamer math, it was impossible. A squad, armed with 1 .30 cal and a mix of garands, carbines and pistols taking on a 4 gun battery (plus the gun bunnies) and a support security platoon that had been positioned for weeks, and armed with 3 or 4 of the usual uber, super german mgs.

So much for wargamer math; and uber, super german mgs, and the rest of that crap. This action is (was) taught under the rubric of 'leadership'. "A small force, well trained, well armed, competently led, adequately oriented towards the objective, suitably motivated, and (most importantly) commonly motivated, will almostly always prevail, given the requisite leadership".

This is right out of the textbook, but what it doesn't say is that leadership is what synthesizes the rest of the requirements into the force that will take the objective. Leadership 'makes' the unit, it doesn't 'lead' the unit. Once a unit is made 'made', a leader just has to get up, and his unit will follow.

This is probably why so many classes lost their shirts in the exercises. None of us was a Winters; none of us had the opportunity to build a 'unit' like Dick Winters did.

The services must do what they do on account of the math. Unfortunate, but necessary. They gotta go with the best they can get from the least common denominator. Fortunately for us, they (in the back of their minds, but there, nevertheless) understand that a Dick Winters will be there when we really need them. Today .. Dogs and Soldiers keep off the grass .. tomorrow, they will remember.

(in reply to patrickl)
Post #: 5
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/27/2007 9:35:59 AM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline 		Hi guys,

Great stuff.

It sure does make you appreciate those guys. Even more so when you see the REAL men interviewed at the start of each episode.

Amazing little mission.

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 6
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/27/2007 2:16:10 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Hi all,

Just watched an episode of Band of Brothers (Day of Days) whilst eating dinner and I wondered something.

It says the attack on Brecourt Manor guns is still taught today at West Point as a textbook assault on a fixed position.

Can you Military guys confirm if that is the case or not?

Thanks


Speedy...The tactic itself is also taught at the Army Ranger school and in concept is in the FM manual as well...........


_____________________________




(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 7
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/27/2007 2:41:18 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline 		Cool.

Thanks Bob.

Out of interest do you know what before Brecourt was the standard example for an assault on a fixed position?

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 8
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/27/2007 5:00:21 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline 		It would only be a guess on my part, but I'm fairly certain it would be something from the Spanish American war (for the U.S.Army.)
The American USMC had experience with assaults in Nicaragua in the thirties and I believe both Lou Diamond and Chesty Puller got their experience there.
(If you never heard of Diamond, IIRC, he remained an EM because he loved to fight, but I think you can do a Google search and learn he was a real legend.?)

_____________________________




(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 9
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/27/2007 6:15:12 PM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Cool.

Thanks Bob.

Out of interest do you know what before Brecourt was the standard example for an assault on a fixed position?


Well I cant say what they teach in West Point on assulting fixed positions. However, speaking as a former US Army infantry squad leader and Special Forces and Ranger instructor I can tell you from the small unit point of view you avoid them. No different than the German Panzerblitz created in WWII. If you HAVE to assult it, you hit it from as many directions as possible, find the weakest point and push everything you can into the hole. Pretty common sense really.

A man can only shoot in 1 direction at a time. Shoot at him from 2 or 3 directions and you are at a decided advantange.

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 10
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/28/2007 1:11:55 AM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline 		I'm sure m10bob is right on for the Marines.

As far as the USArmy goes, we had no real 'action studies' till the Historical Section was instituted in 1942. Prior, before War I, the 'Manuals' were mainly translations of the French; very formalized stuff, almost Napoleonic in terms of what they considered a relevant scope of a manual.

The Infantry School at Benning had no formal cirriculum till Marshall became commandant in the late 20s, he established the "Demonstrate", "Explain", and then "Make 'em Do It" method; also brought in University professionals to ensure 'teaching' was done properly, but it still depended on the 'knowledge' and 'experience' of the individual instructor.

I don't think there were any real institutionalized 'after action studies' till War II (also thanks to G.C.M.). When I was in Analysis in the 70s, we were still trying to come to better grips with it.

Back then the Point taught tactics, yes, but the tactics were still highly formalized; Point was a College of Civil Engineering that had a major A&M component dealing with motorized vehicles and the science of artillery concentration and fortification. We really didn't get our stuff together till War II.

Best answer I can think of to your question (Army perspective), and certainly what impressed the Bradleys & Collins' of the day, might be the "lost battalion" action; Argonne Forest Campaign, 1918. JWE

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 11
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/28/2007 1:52:29 AM   
patrickl


Posts: 1530
Joined: 6/20/2002
From: Singapore
Status: offline 		Hi JWE
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE


quote:

ORIGINAL: patrickl

Hi,

Found this on the web - map and the battle sequence.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-vetscor/1062013/posts

Pat

Thanks to Patrickl for that. If you do the wargamer math, it was impossible. A squad, armed with 1 .30 cal and a mix of garands, carbines and pistols taking on a 4 gun battery (plus the gun bunnies) and a support security platoon that had been positioned for weeks, and armed with 3 or 4 of the usual uber, super german mgs.

So much for wargamer math; and uber, super german mgs, and the rest of that crap. This action is (was) taught under the rubric of 'leadership'. "A small force, well trained, well armed, competently led, adequately oriented towards the objective, suitably motivated, and (most importantly) commonly motivated, will almostly always prevail, given the requisite leadership".

This is right out of the textbook, but what it doesn't say is that leadership is what synthesizes the rest of the requirements into the force that will take the objective. Leadership 'makes' the unit, it doesn't 'lead' the unit. Once a unit is made 'made', a leader just has to get up, and his unit will follow.

This is probably why so many classes lost their shirts in the exercises. None of us was a Winters; none of us had the opportunity to build a 'unit' like Dick Winters did.

The services must do what they do on account of the math. Unfortunate, but necessary. They gotta go with the best they can get from the least common denominator. Fortunately for us, they (in the back of their minds, but there, nevertheless) understand that a Dick Winters will be there when we really need them. Today .. Dogs and Soldiers keep off the grass .. tomorrow, they will remember.


No problem. I am always interested in small group action. I wonder if there is something similar done by the Marines in the Pacific threatre.

Pat

_____________________________


Banner designed by rogueusmc

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 12
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/29/2007 3:55:07 AM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE
Thanks to Patrickl for that. If you do the wargamer math, it was impossible. A squad, armed with 1 .30 cal and a mix of garands, carbines and pistols taking on a 4 gun battery (plus the gun bunnies) and a support security platoon that had been positioned for weeks, and armed with 3 or 4 of the usual uber, super german mgs.

So much for wargamer math; and uber, super german mgs, and the rest of that crap. This action is (was) taught under the rubric of 'leadership'. "A small force, well trained, well armed, competently led, adequately oriented towards the objective, suitably motivated, and (most importantly) commonly motivated, will almostly always prevail, given the requisite leadership".

This is right out of the textbook, but what it doesn't say is that leadership is what synthesizes the rest of the requirements into the force that will take the objective. Leadership 'makes' the unit, it doesn't 'lead' the unit. Once a unit is made 'made', a leader just has to get up, and his unit will follow.

This is probably why so many classes lost their shirts in the exercises. None of us was a Winters; none of us had the opportunity to build a 'unit' like Dick Winters did.

The services must do what they do on account of the math. Unfortunate, but necessary. They gotta go with the best they can get from the least common denominator. Fortunately for us, they (in the back of their minds, but there, nevertheless) understand that a Dick Winters will be there when we really need them. Today .. Dogs and Soldiers keep off the grass .. tomorrow, they will remember.


The problem with reproducing the battle in a school setting is that the defenders know that you're going to assault them and even if they are in the same positions and "playing" lax troops, they really aren't. As the assault unit, you have a bunch of people who don't have the experience working together as a team as those guys did going in. Most of those guys had trained hard with each other for years. That's impossible to reproduce in a school setting.

What Dick Winters did was an amazing feat of leadership and his men performed well beyond what most troops would have been able to accomplish. They had several things going for them though that is just tough to reproduce.

Bill

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 13
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/29/2007 3:57:16 AM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: patrickl

No problem. I am always interested in small group action. I wonder if there is something similar done by the Marines in the Pacific threatre.

Pat


There are several cases of amazing Marine assaults on the island hopping campaign. Once defensive action which I'm sure is studied today is Chesty Puller's defense of Henderson Field. His Marines stopped a massive assault dead in its tracks.

Bill

(in reply to patrickl)
Post #: 14
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/29/2007 2:26:27 PM   
patrickl


Posts: 1530
Joined: 6/20/2002
From: Singapore
Status: offline 		Hi wdolson,

Thanks for your post. Going to hunt for Chesty Puller on the web!

Pat

_____________________________


Banner designed by rogueusmc

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 15
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/29/2007 5:16:39 PM   
nico71


Posts: 121
Joined: 9/2/2003
Status: offline 		Hmmmmm....I think that would be an interesting scenario for Combat Mission. I just don't know how the Editor works. I'm confident that CM is well suited to simulate this scenario. At least against AI Germans. It might not work against a human player, though.

< Message edited by nico71 -- 1/30/2007 12:50:17 AM >

(in reply to patrickl)
Post #: 16
RE: RL Q regarding Band of Brothers - 1/29/2007 5:49:28 PM   
Kwik E Mart


Posts: 2447
Joined: 7/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE


quote:

ORIGINAL: patrickl

Hi,

Found this on the web - map and the battle sequence.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-vetscor/1062013/posts

Pat

Thanks to Patrickl for that. If you do the wargamer math, it was impossible. A squad, armed with 1 .30 cal and a mix of garands, carbines and pistols taking on a 4 gun battery (plus the gun bunnies) and a support security platoon that had been positioned for weeks, and armed with 3 or 4 of the usual uber, super german mgs.

So much for wargamer math; and uber, super german mgs, and the rest of that crap. This action is (was) taught under the rubric of 'leadership'. "A small force, well trained, well armed, competently led, adequately oriented towards the objective, suitably motivated, and (most importantly) commonly motivated, will almostly always prevail, given the requisite leadership".

This is right out of the textbook, but what it doesn't say is that leadership is what synthesizes the rest of the requirements into the force that will take the objective. Leadership 'makes' the unit, it doesn't 'lead' the unit. Once a unit is made 'made', a leader just has to get up, and his unit will follow.

This is probably why so many classes lost their shirts in the exercises. None of us was a Winters; none of us had the opportunity to build a 'unit' like Dick Winters did.

The services must do what they do on account of the math. Unfortunate, but necessary. They gotta go with the best they can get from the least common denominator. Fortunately for us, they (in the back of their minds, but there, nevertheless) understand that a Dick Winters will be there when we really need them. Today .. Dogs and Soldiers keep off the grass .. tomorrow, they will remember.


sounds straight out of orson scott card...ender wiggin probably would have nailed this "exercise"...


_____________________________

Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RL Q regarding Band of Brothers Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.188