Titanwarrior89
Posts: 3283
Joined: 8/28/2003 From: arkansas Status: offline
|
Sounds great. Thanks for the hard work. I do like the changes your making with the Generals(ranks, start dates). I think overall it will enhance a already Great game. quote:
ORIGINAL: ericbabe quote:
ORIGINAL: Titanwarrior89 I am wondering what the historical campaign will look like. The big four things we've done so far are: 1) Combed over the generals file to enter actual (rather than year-based) start dates and to correct other errors. Starting generals at the proper starting rank for the scenario and in the proper province. 2) Went back to our old economic data based on the 1860 census -- changes to the basic economic numbers as well as some starting buildings and population levels. 3) Made CSA troop levels closer to the minimal numbers in the error ranges we found rather than near the maximal ends of those limits as we'd done previously. (For instance, if the West Point Atlas of the Civil War said there were 20,000-40,000 CSA troops in an area, previously we'd have given them almost 40,000. We'll now be giving them closer to 25,000.) 4) Removed all CSA regular navy. I've not been able to find concise firearm data for the OOBs -- if anyone knows of a resource that would tell me how many of each type of firearm each military group might have had in 1861 I'd greatly appreciate such a thing. My guess is that such a table might not exist, since the data I have been able to find on this in general has been a bit scant.
_____________________________
"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours". "Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"
|