Feinder
Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002 From: Land o' Lakes, FL Status: offline
|
India proper wasn't really considered for part of the CPS. In la-la land where Japan had conquored the China, SRA, Burma, Malay, Indo-China, and knocked out USA and Britian, the intent was for low-trade barrier relationship with India. Japan strongly encouraged (and outfitted) insurrectionists for India. Despite the delusional silliness that occurs in WitP, Japan had no illusions about their ability (or lack thereof) to conquor and garrison India, esp while waging a full war against China. They didn't want to conquor India, because they didn't need to conquor India (for a resource point of view), and politicaly, there wasn't much point because they were really hoping that the Indians themselves would either stay out or usurp anyway. India was already a hot-bed of contention in 1940 for Britian. You had Gandi doing the non-violent thing, and Bose a bit more militaristic. There was already talk of an independent India, but Britian certainly wasn't going to let go while at war with the Germans. Gandi stays in India. Bose goes to Germany, but is blown off by Hitler (the whole inferior race thing probably an issue). He then heads to Japan where he is deemed useful for stirring up trouble. Japan rolls thru SE-Asia, Malay, and Burma in 1941, and early 1942. Esp Burma, about 1/3 the population is of Indian descent. Many flee to India, and upwards to 50% never make it (starved or diseased on the trails). There's a lot of ill-will, because westerners get priority on shipping and thus don't go over the trails. Many stay in Burma. Japanese propaganda is somewhat truthful in that, the claim the war is not with the Indians, but against the western capitolist oppressors (and the barbaric Chinese whome they're only trying "liberate"). Most men/soldiers are stockaded by Japan for several months. They send in Bose where they can serve in Indian National Army, or stay in the stockade. This is not a small unit. At it's height, it about 12,000 troops. Frankly, they're poorly trained, poorly equipped, and poorly led. But these guys did buy into the notion that they were going help liberate India from the Brits (and naturally Japan said they'd help). In summer of 42, the worst flood in 80 years hits India and wipes out the rice crop. Allies did send potatos, but potatos are harder to digest than rice, and many people couldn't eat the potatos. Conservative estimates say 10% of the population starved. Some estimates say as high as 20%. Even at 10%, that's a LOT of people. Burma on the other hand, has a record rice crop. There is serious debate in the Indian Congress of trading rice from Burma if India "goes neutral". Naturally, the Brits poo-poo this. So Gandi leads a national strike. Now the Brits are really pissed. A strike in the middle of a war doesn't curry favor (no pun intended). Brits end up havig to bring in a bunch of Commonwealth troops from South Africa to help riots, and release Indian troops to help work to feed their families. In 1943, India actualy has record rice crop, but they're short on peopel to actually harvest it. But by 1943, the war has turned in Allies favor, and that's fairly obvious to most. There are lots of troops now in India, including Americans (who bring lots of money and food). So essentially India & Gandi agree to "play nice with Britain" on the "strong expectation" that they're going to get their indepenenace as soon as the war is over with. -F- * regarding the people in turbans - Those are most likely Sikhs. Only about 2% of Indians are Sikhs, it's not really accurate to equate the pictures of folks in turbans to be Indians (altho most Sikhs are Indians, few Indians are actually Sikhs). Prior to WW2, much of Burma and Malaya was very much a mixed lot of folks. You even had a very substantial population of Chinese livig there as permanent residents (not just as refugees from the war in the north).
< Message edited by Feinder -- 2/24/2007 7:58:48 AM >
_____________________________
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me
|