Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Has anyone else seen this?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Has anyone else seen this? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 12:31:14 AM   
shangrila

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 7/6/2006
Status: offline 		Hi all,
I have been running in to a problem with the latest patch, stock game. Wanted to know if anyone else has seen this.

Ships leave port full of men, or Air Groups...as the TF proceeds men bleed out back to their base over days.
My opponent is seeing the same thing and it's giving him headaches.

Our current hypothesis is that it has something to do with TF's being disbanded and possibly information regarding that TF number not being cleared from the program. When a new TF gets that number, something happens and it starts leaking men back to it's base.

Thanks in advance!
Post #: 1
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 12:45:20 AM   
jwilkerson


Posts: 10525
Joined: 9/15/2002
From: Kansas
Status: offline 		There is one problem we know about that is addressed in the current up comming patch. Though the symtoms sound a bit different. In the problem we know about, you disband one TF in a port and others stop loading.
There is also a movement glitch that is being addressed with uncleared fields in the TF needing to be cleared.
But your problem does sound a bit different than either of these.

_____________________________

AE Project Lead
New Game Project Lead

(in reply to shangrila)
Post #: 2
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 12:51:00 AM   
shangrila

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 7/6/2006
Status: offline 		yes it is different and have experienced those and work around them.
related to TF disband bug, possible, but not it's not just the symptoms of stopping other TFs from loading.

We have seen this since around December or January. And have restarted our game and reinstalled/repatched once in that time frame.Because it was such a headache for my Japanese opponent at the beginning of the war (Imagine loading your invasion forces, going every direction, to start seeing men magically back at port...and in some cases no men left on the ship given a week or two on board...no men lost mind you...just all beamed back to port.)
I have seen happen to me as the Allies as well. And we make sure the unit is fully loaded, leaving nothing back at port before we set sail.
Thanks

(in reply to shangrila)
Post #: 3
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 1:16:53 AM   
niceguy2005


Posts: 12523
Joined: 7/4/2005
From: Super secret hidden base
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: shangrila

Ships leave port full of men, or Air Groups...as the TF proceeds men bleed out back to their base over days.

@#%! desserters...they should be shot.

_____________________________


Artwork graciously provided by Dixie

(in reply to shangrila)
Post #: 4
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 1:51:26 AM   
saj42


Posts: 1125
Joined: 4/19/2005
From: Somerset, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: niceguy2005

quote:

ORIGINAL: shangrila

Ships leave port full of men, or Air Groups...as the TF proceeds men bleed out back to their base over days.

@#%! desserters...they should be shot.


consciencious objectors more like
At least they're not infected with a virus and defecting to the enemy like their leaders are prone to do

_____________________________


Banner by rogueusmc

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 5
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 3:31:52 AM   
RevRick


Posts: 2617
Joined: 9/16/2000
From: Thomasville, GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tallyho!

quote:

ORIGINAL: niceguy2005

quote:

ORIGINAL: shangrila

Ships leave port full of men, or Air Groups...as the TF proceeds men bleed out back to their base over days.

@#%! desserters...they should be shot.


consciencious objectors more like
At least they're not infected with a virus and defecting to the enemy like their leaders are prone to do


Off topic, and probably in bad taste - but it occured to me. Would the US be accused of germ warfare if we gave that virus to Al Quaeda? Maybe we ought to just give it to their computers.

_____________________________

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(in reply to saj42)
Post #: 6
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 8:08:25 PM   
panda124c

 

Posts: 1692
Joined: 5/23/2000
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline 		Hey can we get the inverse of this bug installed where men teleport to ships at sea?

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 7
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 9:22:49 PM   
Rafael Warsaw


Posts: 202
Joined: 2/20/2007
Status: offline 		Shangrila:

Not every unit starts game with its structure in 100% ready and in place.
Only part of LBU arrive as a reinforcement on turn they supposed to arrive.
It usually takes some time for a LBU to be at full strenght with all detachments in place.

ie: You load Inf div wich just have arrive only to find that part of this unit is sitting in a port.
Its not a leakage from TF :) Just a new elements of this div have arrived.
Nothing happends fast in this game. everything takes time :)

get used to it.

OR all of this talkings about THE dark side actually works.....

R.



_____________________________

IJArmy: 10% of Planning, 90% of Faith. BANZAI!
"A long and studied assessment of your situation, fabertong leads me to reach the unescapable conclusion that your fcuked mate. Hope this helps." by Raverdave.

(in reply to shangrila)
Post #: 8
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/20/2007 11:51:37 PM   
histgamer

 

Posts: 1455
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline 		How do you know when a unit is fully completed building?

(in reply to Rafael Warsaw)
Post #: 9
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/21/2007 12:27:23 AM   
RevRick


Posts: 2617
Joined: 9/16/2000
From: Thomasville, GA
Status: offline 		Check the TOE button... It shows what the unit is supposed to have - which is sometimes not doing it a favor..

_____________________________

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(in reply to histgamer)
Post #: 10
RE: Has anyone else seen this? - 3/22/2007 1:04:38 AM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline 		The part of this issue that I think a few folks have missed is that the troops already loaded on ships, at sea, slowly disappear from the ships...and seem to rejoin their parent unit back where they boarded.  I'm quite curious if anyone else has input on this issue.  I think I've seen it happen, but I wasn't sure what was going on.  Against the AI, I was evacuating some fragments from the PI to Darwin.  When they got to Darwin, the units unloaded from the ships, but the fragment units were not at Darwin, or anywhere else in Oz, the next turn.  I thought I might be seeing some type of attrition loss to the fragments, but I never checked the actual number of squads, etc while they were still aboard their transporting ships.

Ideas, anyone?

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to RevRick)
Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Has anyone else seen this? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.344