Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 5/5/2007 8:04:34 PM   
tucson3217

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 2/15/2007
Status: offline
Excuse me if it has been said, I did only a quick scan through the posts...
butthe term or theory the original poster might be thinking of is/are 'kondratieff Waves'

if that is not what you are thinking of, it is stillk something similar based on the theory of repeating behaviour patterns in humans using 'long wave analysis'.
I hink the theory is in part based on the idea that the current generation is warned by their parents and sees the proiblems their parents had and thus we as individuals and a a society through specific laws and stop gaps end up preparing for the last boogey man.  This bit of cognative dissonance has many if not most people and institutions dismissing the fears and problems of our grandfathers (often with such phrases that we are somehow 'better' or 'different' now than in the 'old' days.  Those old days people were cute and simple, we have it all worked out however, don't worry your pretty little head grandma, we have it all under control now, we are so very advanced). 

In this way a 'perfect' storm brews in which society prepares for the last disaster, thus ignoring and almost ensuring the mistakes/errors of two geneartions past are those which will come into being.  It is predictive in that not only do we not prepare, but despite warning signs that might signal the brewing of an older danger we have not prepared for or considered. In this way the events of generations past become the more likely outcome, and there in lies some of the basis of contrary investing and forcasting.

An example of society dismissing events they consider 'too old' to worry about can be found in the often heard and accepted phrase used in the media to dismiss 'bad news'.  The phrase starts out something like this "housing will not go down much in price if history is any guide. Smart investors know the trends and history of the housing market and point out that NEVER IN THE POST WAR ERA has housing declined over 10% nationwide, peak to trough"

And with one simple sentance the entire great depression is dismissed and not accounted for...after all, that was like forever ago, nothing from back then is relevant.. it has nothing to do with our economy today, the modern economy is better suited to withstand stress.  It is different than back then, I mean we have the federal reserve making sure the 'free market' works the way a 'free market' is supposed to!  Namley that big banks and big money are 'too big to fail' and that no matter how risky or how far they push the envelope it is better if the middle class and poor pick up the tab for risky loans and ventures.  And before you ask, no yo can't have any of the profit they made of of same riskyloans/ventures-afterall they risked your hard earned money for it, and CEOS have to eat too ya know?'

ummmm, yeah.  sorry for the rant. little off topic.  anyway, the every other generational thing is somewhat interesting to me.  Not sure how accurate it really is, but heir is some logic to some of the ideaas behind it.  It i at least useful in some broad measure, if not a more specific one.  Keep in mind as well that the variance will tend to change and the spacing (measured in years) between 'major events' will tend to become longer since some of the theory of what and how humans precieve future risk is based on our lifespans, and more importantly our 'working years lifespan', which may be twice as long now due to healthcare, lack of physical work and the ability to remain quite productive simply sitting at a keyboard and computer screen.  The idea that the wave lengths should become longer inbetween marked events is based in most part due to these so called 'productive years'- these will be the years in which one most likely has the greatest influence on society and our general mass consiousness and futre directions)

here is a link:  http://www.thelongwaveanalyst.ca/

(have not read the link, can't vouch if it is anygood or not.  but it is a start.  be advised that there is a lot of missunderstanding and bull surrounded around this type of theory...bullcrap comeing from botgh sides of the debat-the over zelous and somtimes wildly assuming believers and their bewilldered or downright incredulous opponents.so take from it what you will... :)

(in reply to Ursa MAior)
Post #: 61
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 12/27/2009 12:58:06 PM   
CSO_Talorgan


Posts: 768
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline
The answer to the original question BTW is "hegemonic stability theory":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegemonic_stability_theory

(in reply to Rune Iversen)
Post #: 62
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 12/27/2009 5:52:09 PM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline
Not sure if these are what youre referring to but also found these references.

Dewey, E.R. (1951) "The 57-year cycle in international conflict". Cycles 2, 1, 4-6.
Dewey, E.R. (1952) "The 142-year cycle in war". Cycles 3, 6, 201-204.
Dewey, E.R. (1967) "Systematic Reconnaissance of Cycles in War". Cycles, January 1967. (Request reprint).

RIck

(in reply to CSO_Talorgan)
Post #: 63
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 12/28/2009 11:19:49 PM   
CSO_Talorgan


Posts: 768
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline
I'll look them up, thanks.

(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 64
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 1/4/2010 8:32:04 PM   
CSO_Talorgan


Posts: 768
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline
This diagram says it all:


(in reply to CSO_Talorgan)
Post #: 65
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 1/4/2010 9:03:24 PM   
wilecki

 

Posts: 61
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CSO_Talorgan

This diagram says it all:




There is more on this subject presented by Graham Chapman around 0:15 here

Couldn't resist, sorry :)

Could you explain what exactly is presented in the graph?

< Message edited by wilecki -- 1/4/2010 9:04:51 PM >

(in reply to CSO_Talorgan)
Post #: 66
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 1/4/2010 9:23:41 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rune Iversen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ursa MAior

Verify it.



Hungary could have stayed neutral Like Yugoslavia did or been of the same sceptical bent as the Bulgarians were (ie. support the axis effort diplomatically but don´t commit any troops). Instead the hungarian fascists, eager for revenge after WW1 and with dreams of a "greater Hungary" gleaming in their eyes threw in their lot with Adolf and got their just desserts, since Adolf promised the greater return. Nobody forced the hungarians to throw in their lot fully with uncle Adolf.All that it would have taken for this to be different was for someone with half a brain to run the hungarian strategy. Not much could have prevented Hungary from falling within the communist sphere after the war though, even if Hungary had remained neutral, but one could at least have hoped for better terms and a greater degree of independence (like Yugoslavia got for instance)


Well, naturally they had a lot of choices to make. However, I do think the "no choice but" refers rather to the fact that it was the only sensible choice. You know, kinda like "eat cake or die".

(in reply to Rune Iversen)
Post #: 67
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 1/5/2010 1:46:57 AM   
Halsey

 

Posts: 5069
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CSO_Talorgan

Can anyone remember the name of the theory about humanity convulsing itself in war every 110 - 150 years? The other elements of the theory were that there was a predominant economic power between each of the cycles as a change of predominant economic power could only come about as a result of a war. I think too the succeeding major economic power was always to the west of the last predominant economic power.



This theory went out the window with the advent of WMD's.

The standard theory is now based on MAD.
With it being on the top end of the scale.

There are different thresholds of conflict, leading up to MAD.
Check into any political science theory to see what current model/level is being assessed.
Every conflict is different.

(in reply to CSO_Talorgan)
Post #: 68
RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years - 1/8/2010 8:07:43 PM   
CSO_Talorgan


Posts: 768
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wilecki

Could you explain what exactly is presented in the graph?


I'd guess dead bodies measured against time.

Good vid BTW.

(in reply to wilecki)
Post #: 69
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: War cycle every 110 - 150 years Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.453