ChezDaJez
Posts: 3436
Joined: 11/12/2004 From: Chehalis, WA Status: offline
|
quote:
Fire in the Sky is just really weak. Not appalingly badly written nor egregiously inaccaurate but not a standout in any respect. Very reliant on anecdotes, doesn't really provide a good "look and feel" for the period it covers, and doesn't really achieve anything useful or insightful by way of analysis. The book was never intended to be a definitive and exhaustive account of war in the South Pacific, As Bergerud himself states in the preface (page xvii), "This book is not a standard narrative history... Because the narrative groundwork has been done, I have not tried to create another account of the war in the South Pacific as viewed by important military commanders. Instead, aided by dozens of original interviews with American and Anzac veterans of the conflict, I have tried to examine and explain the war's texture and tempo.... I have tried to find the point where the coherence of war meets the brutal experience that confronts those who fight it. In other words, rather than treating the struggle as a chess match between rival leaders, I have tried to reconstruct and cast light upon the flow of battle... but the core of my book concerns the men who fought the war, the weapons they used, how they viewed the events, and the nature of the battlefield where they tended to do their forbidding task." And it does that quite well... from the little guy's POV. It doesn't attempt to provide a detailed analysis of each air battle instead it does define the battles in terms of the men who actually fought them. And it does provide a good description of many of the air bases, Allied and Japanese. That's what makes it a good read. Certainly not a book to be "avoided." Chez
_____________________________
Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998) VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78 ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81 VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87 Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90 ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92 NRD Seattle 1992-96 VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98
|