Vincenzo_Beretta
Posts: 440
Joined: 3/13/2001 From: Milan, Italy Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Flankerk If I can recap, my question was a simple one. Was the Players Database 3.8 compliant? Thank you for clarifying that it isn't. And where I did do that? What I actually "clarified" is that your standards for "non-compliance" (if applied to all the DBs out there) would make very few of them "compliant" - even some of those you mark as "compliant". This contradiction happens, as I explained, because actually it is your line of reasoning to be flawed, not the DBs themselves. I think that your intent is good, but you should really *read* what other people post before answering. quote:
ORIGINAL: Flankerk If you ignore the new requirements the game becomes significantly less functional. I would not like to see people assuming that this is due to the game. The game already has A LOT of problems, I agree. Here is a good list: http://www.gamesquad.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42076 ...and of course we are all waiting for the day when they will be fixed by the dev. team. quote:
ORIGINAL: Flankerk If authors have no intention of updating their databases, thats up to them I agree. However it is disingenuous to release a 3.8 compatible database that isn't at all compliant. No it's not. Just because AGSI claims that some things work does not mean that anything actually "works". Take for example the claim that UnRep works. "Underway Replenishment including refueling" http://www.harpoon5.com/wiki/main/index.php?title=H3ANW:373#Other_Enhancements.2FAdjustments Anyone foolhardy enough to try and implement that 'feature' would now be singing the blues. http://tinyurl.com/yo558v So, in principle, I agree with VCDH: quote:
There are two ways to look at this. From a scenario or DB perspective. A 3.8 Compliant DB means that the DB author has taken all steps necessary to get the most out of the new features that are available in v3.8 (UnRep, etc). - or to avoid them when deemed necessary. However, this is different from just arbitrarily decide what "rocks" and what "doesn't" - only creating the opportunity for strawmen as a byproduct. Thus, this is why I disagree with Flanks' approach
_____________________________
|