Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Allied KB

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Allied KB Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Allied KB - 8/16/2007 8:19:46 PM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1526
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline 		its mar 42 i have all the US CVs - if i am to use them offensively is it best to have them in one TF, KB style, or 5 seperate TFs all in the same hex?

Ta

Post #: 1
RE: Allied KB - 8/16/2007 8:35:42 PM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline 		5

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 2
RE: Allied KB - 8/16/2007 9:07:01 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline 		Basically Yamamoto hugger is correct.

Allthough I got luck with 4 US CV's in 1 TF vs KB in early 1942. None of the US sunk and I did put 3 IJN CV's to bottom.


(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 3
RE: Allied KB - 8/16/2007 9:25:51 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline 		I wouldn't be in a rush to take on KB in Mar-42.  If KB has split up, and you can destroy it piece-male, maybe 5 USN CVs vs. 2 or 3 IJN CVs, you'll be ok.  But don't go 5 on 5, and certainly not 5 USN vs. 6 IJN.

Patience.
-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 4
RE: Allied KB - 8/16/2007 11:19:37 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline 		What about late 42, when they have upgraded and have full airgroups? Together or in separate TF?

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 5
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 2:22:25 AM   
Gem35


Posts: 3420
Joined: 9/12/2004
From: Dallas, Texas
Status: offline 		against the AI you don't need all 5 in a death-star, it's easier to let the jap KB sail retardedly into your LBA to die horribly.
against humans I would still not organize all 5 in one TF, keep them seperate and as Feinder said and Guns N Roses sang, just a little patience.....

< Message edited by Gem35 -- 8/17/2007 2:23:47 AM >

_____________________________

It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?


Banner By Feurer Krieg

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 6
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 2:30:05 AM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline 		It is best to ignore all historical precedent when it comes to CV vs CV combat just as the designers did.

(in reply to Gem35)
Post #: 7
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 2:46:24 AM   
Halsey

 

Posts: 5069
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

I wouldn't be in a rush to take on KB in Mar-42.  If KB has split up, and you can destroy it piece-male, maybe 5 USN CVs vs. 2 or 3 IJN CVs, you'll be ok.  But don't go 5 on 5, and certainly not 5 USN vs. 6 IJN.

Patience.
-F-


I go after the IJN as soon as I have 4 US CV's.
Usually around Aug/Sept/Oct 42.
I draw them in with multiple invasions somewhere around the Gilberts.

Two US CV's will get creamed, but I always get at least 4 of the IJN CV's.

After that, the KB is done being a major threat.


_____________________________


(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 8
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 2:53:55 AM   
docpaul

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 5/17/2002
Status: offline 		The KB just did the big STUPID in my game..June of 42 and they actually fell for the battle of Midway..again...I had ALL my SBD's and Devastators in either Midway or Johnson.  About 10 subs around and any other bombers I could fit.  ALl 4 of my carriers were there as well..One which was the bait.  I lost alot of planes but no carriers and he lost FIVE and a CVL...not all at once...by the time the dust settled...  Two were torpedoed going to Truk.  WHy the AI didn't retire right away is beyond me.  I absolutely got the best dice rolls under the sun..it was awesome, but now it'll be boring again.  I think he still will hace 3 or 4 carries though so I'll go at it awhile longer and see what happens.  Unfortunately I may need to restart as while I'm a noob...He's going to have a hard time I think minus that in June.  I have Guadalcanal already and Milne is pretty solid albeit only a 2 air right now.  I took Guam back right after the Midway fiasco.  They don't seem to be locking on any particular area though. He now has about 80 zero's at Rabaul so my B17's are getting slaughtered....and what's up with the 17C..that thing can't do anything despite decent experience....Hornet is pretty bad but at Pearl.   I love the game but organizing the first couple weeks takes forever..and is a bit tedious.  AI is on hard but I guess I'll try the super hard.  I'd love to try PBEM but I don't really get the logistical end good yet.  In reading the reports here and the messages...it would not be pretty for me....someday...lol

< Message edited by docpaul -- 8/17/2007 2:56:03 AM >

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 9
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 3:38:38 AM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

its mar 42 i have all the US CVs - if i am to use them offensively is it best to have them in one TF, KB style, or 5 seperate TFs all in the same hex?

Ta




Hmmmm,...are you asking us to give away tactical secrets?!

Not sure I am going to publicly go there

B

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 10
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 5:31:27 AM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		I try not to put all my eggs, er CVs, in one basket that early in the war. Terminus almost killed me because I did that. I sent the Catalina pilots to Nome without thier airplanes after that one.

(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 11
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 6:13:50 AM   
ctangus


Posts: 2153
Joined: 10/13/2005
From: Boston, Mass.
Status: offline 		In '42 you risk coordination penalties for any TF with over 100 planes. (Section 7.something in the manual.) The US CVs carry roughly 80 planes in '42 so it's best to have 1 US CV per TF. If you're short on escorts you might have to go 2 CVs per TF. The Brit CVs, with roughly 50 planes each, can safely be put in 2 CVs per TF.

Splitting up your CVS also spreads out your risk. A single incoming strike will only hit one TF. If you're running with one CV TFs a single strike against you will almost certainly overwhelm & kill a single CV. But if you have a 5 CV TF a single strike could possibly sink or damage all of those carriers.

It's not grossly unhistorical to do so either - part of the reason the real USN often operated their CVs apart in '42 was to reduce the risk of losing multiple CVs at once.

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 12
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 9:28:54 AM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline 		I just lured a mini kb into a trap in April of 42 he moved in with 3cv's and 2 cve's + escort because he thought my CV’s were in oz. I killed his kb because it was all in 1 tf. But on my side enterprise took 3 torps and 10 bomb hits. While she sunk that was the only ship he hit because that was the only strike he got off. If I had had all my cvs in tf I would have probably lost 3cv's

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to ctangus)
Post #: 13
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 6:01:50 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline 		OK, then what is the best config for KB to counter the multiple 1 CV taskforces of the allies? I have been using groups of 2cv with one CVL. Does it make more sense to have them all in single CV TF?

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 14
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 6:35:12 PM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline 		I operate my Japs in pairs when I think there may be allied carriers around, and in a group of 4 (3 CV, 1 CVL) when I dont. I NEVER have more than 3 CVs + 1 CVL in a TF.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 15
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 8:31:24 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline 		I would say that ideally, IJN would operate single CV TFs as well.  However, as IJN, you don't tend to have enough ships to do this, so IJN is forced to 2 - 3 CVs per TF.

-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 16
RE: Allied KB - 8/17/2007 10:39:13 PM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline 		Exactly. Early war (7 Dec to middle of '42) about half the Jap DDs dont even have an ASW capability. Thats why I keep them tight.

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 17
RE: Allied KB - 8/31/2007 7:34:19 PM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1526
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline 		if i do split them all up  - whats the best TF composition? i now have 5 lots of TFs with just 2 DDs and a cruiser each - seems a bit light for me poor carriers!

or do i stick all the non CVs in one TF and escort the 5 CVs?

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 18
RE: Allied KB - 8/31/2007 8:03:26 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline 		Given that you probably can't do one flight deck per TF...

I'd split them up into something like

Akagi, Kaga,
Soryu, Hiryu,
Shok, Zui
Hiyo, Junyo
Shoho, Zuiho
Hosho, Taiyo

But basically, you're keeping elements with similar range and speed together.

You might also create a "bait" TF, by keeping mini-KB together (with Hiyo, Junyo), and then splitting your carrier divs into pairs, keeping all in same hex.  It will give a greater chance of the "bait TF" to get hit, than your large CVs.  It would stil hurt, but it would disperse your assets a bit.

Something like this...
Akagi, Kaga,
Soryu, Hiryu,
Shok, Zui
Hiyo, Junyo, Shoho, Zuiho, Hosho, Taiyo

-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 19
RE: Allied KB - 8/31/2007 8:45:16 PM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1526
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline 		its allied forces!


(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 20
RE: Allied KB - 8/31/2007 9:12:56 PM   
VSWG


Posts: 3432
Joined: 5/31/2006
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

if i do split them all up - whats the best TF composition? i now have 5 lots of TFs with just 2 DDs and a cruiser each - seems a bit light for me poor carriers!

or do i stick all the non CVs in one TF and escort the 5 CVs?

Look here, section II.B, third thread from the bottom:

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1274014

Ideally, every CV should be escorted by at least 14 ships in order to maximize the AA value of the TF. If you add more ships, the AA value still increases, but with diminishing returns.

_____________________________


(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 21
RE: Allied KB - 8/31/2007 10:31:43 PM   
ChezDaJez


Posts: 3436
Joined: 11/12/2004
From: Chehalis, WA
Status: offline 		Regardless of whether we are talking KB or allied deathstars, it's best to have no more than 2 CVs per TF but you also need to make sure that these seperate TFs are mutually supporting and have at least one fast BB in the TF to increase the AA and to draw enemy bombers.

Alternately, a surface TF with 1-2 BBs stationed 1-2 hexes ahead of your carriers is quite useful in soaking up airstrikes.

For the allied player, the best way to deal with KB is to stay under cover of land-based air... especially your 4Es. After mid-late 42, KB is pretty much neutralized by the presence of allied 4Es and the strength of allied carriers. Not many Japanese players want to risk KB to 4Es unless the reward is really worth it.

As a Japanese player, I like to split KB up and use them to raid convoy lanes. I don't scatter them to the wind though. I keep the various KB TFs close enough to reform within 2-3 days. If I conduct a raid on a shipping lane, one TF attacks while at least one other remains in the background. In this way if something unexpected comes up I have the option to run or to bring the other TF forward.

I do try to keep at least 6 CV/CVLs in CENTPAC and the rest in the SRA.

Chez



_____________________________

Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 22
RE: Allied KB - 9/1/2007 1:17:25 AM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

I would say that ideally, IJN would operate single CV TFs as well. However, as IJN, you don't tend to have enough ships to do this, so IJN is forced to 2 - 3 CVs per TF.


Actually the IJN CVs should really all be in 2 ship TFs (1 CV, 1 DD). Their doctrine called for the CAP and ship manuevering for defense. The idea to "ring" a carrier or force of carriers closely with ships which supported the carrier(s) with their flak did not get past the 'study' stage in the IJN til 1944. It may have saved Zuikaku at Coral Sea - she was so far away from Shokaku (which got heavily damaged) that the Americans never saw her so the doctrine did have some benefits.

Since every foible of American doctrine is hard coded (and when its not the JP usually wants to make a house rule to force it on the AP) it really seems the Japanese ought to be bound by the same sort of thing.

KB was never TF38/58.

< Message edited by spence -- 9/1/2007 1:19:00 AM >

(in reply to ChezDaJez)
Post #: 23
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Allied KB Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.281