motnahp
Posts: 1837
Joined: 8/22/2005 Status: offline
|
I touched on this a bit in the Public Beta area, under the topic of "Taking one for the Team". I did not have any data to back up my fears, but apparently you do. IMO, when the seldom-used players were (mostly) made into 5-point scrubs (on the 1-100 scale), it opened up some cans of worms. When pitchers with "5 Stuff" and "5 Control" take the mound, a series of bad things happen. It's feasible that a 5-point batter could be badly overmatched by MLB pitching, but his ineptitude does not scream out at you in a boxscore the way a 5-point pitcher's poor performance does. It doesn't take too many instances of a pitcher allowing 15 runs in an inning, walking 10-15 men, for realism to vanish. Batters, too, can cause problems for a manager. For my 2006 Braves, I have Scott Thorman on the roster as a bench player. In his rookie season of 2006, he batted 128 times and hit .234 with 5 homers. Since he imported as a 5-point scrub, he really has no chance of getting close to his real-life stats. For my assn., he went hitless in his first 16 at-bats, before getting a single. Do I play him more often and hope his statistics will normalize? The words, "Strike Three.....Yerrrr Out" ring in my ears whenever I consider him as a pinch hitter. I believe he struck out at least 10 of his first 16 ABs. My point is that both the pitchers and batters need some tweaking, with the emphasis placed on the pitchers, since their performances as 5-point "scrubs" can be downright frightful and association-poisoning.
|