RE: Best board-game?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Best board-game?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: Best board-game?

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Best board-game? - 9/2/2007 1:24:08 AM

Twotribes

Posts: 6929
Joined: 2/15/2002
From: Jacksonville NC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hertston

It's hard to disagree with SL/ASL (or indeed chess!)... but I actually played an awful lot more Starfleet Battles.

I LOVED Starfleet battles. I always played the Klingons, absolutely sucked at it, but damn was I Brave. For those not in the know in that game the majority of the Klingon weapons are inferior to Starfleet weapons, your usual enemy. And your shields are not up to par for the required charge you have to make to bring your phaser 2's into killing range.

I still have around 100 board games rotting in my garage. I love war games.

(in reply to Hertston)

Post #: 61

RE: Best board-game? - 9/2/2007 1:42:03 AM

Twotribes

Posts: 6929
Joined: 2/15/2002
From: Jacksonville NC
Status: offline

Another game I have that I liked was the tactical donut at Alesia.

The Romans have Vercentrix (ok I have no idea how to spell his name) trapped in the town of Alesia. A releaving army is coming to break the siege. The Romans have not enough men to cover the entire circle inside and out. They have 23 forts though that have a huge Area of range. And they have interior lines compared to the relief force.

It is a 2 day battle. To win the Barbarians have to get Vercentrix out and he can not ever get in range of a fort or archery unit. The outside army has hidden movement into zones. All the romans know is when a zone has something in it.

One major ploy is for the barbarians to work on making a hole or two in the fort coverage on the first day and then working to clear a path on the second day.

(in reply to Twotribes)

Post #: 62

RE: Best board-game? - 9/2/2007 1:47:51 AM

James Ward

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twotribes

Another game I have that I liked was the tactical donut at Alesia.

The Romans have Vercentrix (ok I have no idea how to spell his name) trapped in the town of Alesia. A releaving army is coming to break the siege. The Romans have not enough men to cover the entire circle inside and out. They have 23 forts though that have a huge Area of range. And they have interior lines compared to the relief force.

It is a 2 day battle. To win the Barbarians have to get Vercentrix out and he can not ever get in range of a fort or archery unit. The outside army has hidden movement into zones. All the romans know is when a zone has something in it.

One major ploy is for the barbarians to work on making a hole or two in the fort coverage on the first day and then working to clear a path on the second day.

That was a great game. Very challenging for both sides.

(in reply to Twotribes)

Post #: 63

RE: Best board-game? - 9/2/2007 2:55:45 AM

madorosh

Posts: 390
Joined: 3/2/2003
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sarge

quote:

ORIGINAL: Michael Dorosh

Not trying to be nasty, just trying to stimulate something more interesting than a list of people talking past each other. We've already seen chess, card games and monopoly listed among wargames - and the assertion that the ASL Monolith trumps them all. I'd be far more interested in knowing why people feel these games are "the best" or for that matter what they feel "best" means. Otherwise, it's just empty calories *burp*

Is a explanation of the reasons one would choose �Chess� as holding a top slot in the all time list real needed ?

If so ,
Point out the titles mentioned in this thread not a distant relative of �Chess�

Now THAT is a fascinating question in itself. I'd say none of the titles so far are distant relatives of Chess. I'll postulate that Tactics was a completely new breed of game and all it has in common with Chess is the fact that the game board is divided into squares. All other commercial board wargames descend from Tactics and Tactics II.

I'll postulate further that the most innovative wargames have the most inaccurate titles. Tactics was actually a game about operations, and Squad Leader (which was the first squad level game to do away with an odds-based CRT) is a game in which the player never, ever gets to lead a squad.

_____________________________

The Tactical Wargamer

(in reply to Sarge)

Post #: 64

RE: Best board-game? - 9/2/2007 3:24:51 AM

James Ward

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline

"Now THAT is a fascinating question in itself. I'd say none of the titles so far are distant relatives of Chess. I'll postulate that Tactics was a completely new breed of game and all it has in common with Chess is the fact that the game board is divided into squares. All other commercial board wargames descend from Tactics and Tactics II."

I would disagree with that. The old Milton Bradley game Civil War was the first 'area' type game that I can remember. Broadsides, Dogfight and Hit the Beach all have ideas that were used in other games (cards, hit points etc).

(in reply to madorosh)

Post #: 65

RE: Best board-game? - 9/2/2007 3:30:07 AM

madorosh

Posts: 390
Joined: 3/2/2003
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: James Ward

"Now THAT is a fascinating question in itself. I'd say none of the titles so far are distant relatives of Chess. I'll postulate that Tactics was a completely new breed of game and all it has in common with Chess is the fact that the game board is divided into squares. All other commercial board wargames descend from Tactics and Tactics II."

I would disagree with that. The old Milton Bradley game Civil War was the first 'area' type game that I can remember. Broadsides, Dogfight and Hit the Beach all have ideas that were used in other games (cards, hit points etc).

You mean this one - ? http://boardgamegeek.com/game/2428 It came out after Tactics.

_____________________________

The Tactical Wargamer

(in reply to James Ward)

Post #: 66

RE: Best board-game? - 9/2/2007 3:36:13 AM

James Ward

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Michael Dorosh

quote:

ORIGINAL: James Ward

"Now THAT is a fascinating question in itself. I'd say none of the titles so far are distant relatives of Chess. I'll postulate that Tactics was a completely new breed of game and all it has in common with Chess is the fact that the game board is divided into squares. All other commercial board wargames descend from Tactics and Tactics II."

I would disagree with that. The old Milton Bradley game Civil War was the first 'area' type game that I can remember. Broadsides, Dogfight and Hit the Beach all have ideas that were used in other games (cards, hit points etc).

You mean this one - ? http://boardgamegeek.com/game/2428 It came out after Tactics.

Yes. Those games added innovations that Tactics didn't.

(in reply to madorosh)

Post #: 67

RE: Best board-game? - 9/3/2007 9:41:53 PM

simovitch

Posts: 5488
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline

I was lucky enough to have 3 older brothers during the heyday of boardgames. The satisfaction from that fraternal interaction was grand, and provides the best gaming experiences of my life.

So the not-too-difficult multiplayer ones stand out as the 'best' for me - Diplomacy, Kingmaker, Origins of WW2, Conquistador.

Diplomacy is a classic - genious design and simple mechanics. And no random number generator...

_____________________________

simovitch

(in reply to James Ward)

Post #: 68

RE: Best board-game? - 9/3/2007 10:03:40 PM

Prince of Eckm�hl

Posts: 2459
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: simovitch

I was lucky enough to have 3 older brothers during the heyday of boardgames. The satisfaction from that fraternal interaction was grand, and provides the best gaming experiences of my life.

So the not-too-difficult multiplayer ones stand out as the 'best' for me - Diplomacy, Kingmaker, Origins of WW2, Conquistador.

Diplomacy is a classic - genious design and simple mechanics. And no random number generator...

For me, boardgaming was always about relationships. While there were folks who showed up at club meetings that didn't participate, it was always my opponents who I got to know and whose company I most enjoyed. Or was it that we got on well and that drew us into a brawl over Afrika Korps? I can't say for sure, but, to me, games without people are just too austere, too limited in possibility.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)

_____________________________

Government is the opiate of the masses.

(in reply to simovitch)

Post #: 69

RE: Best board-game? - 9/4/2007 5:18:45 AM

madorosh

Posts: 390
Joined: 3/2/2003
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: simovitch

I was lucky enough to have 3 older brothers during the heyday of boardgames. The satisfaction from that fraternal interaction was grand, and provides the best gaming experiences of my life.

So the not-too-difficult multiplayer ones stand out as the 'best' for me - Diplomacy, Kingmaker, Origins of WW2, Conquistador.

Diplomacy is a classic - genious design and simple mechanics. And no random number generator...

Diplomacy was certainly unique in that regards. Axis and Allies - the original - actually had appeals beyond just wargamers; I remember high school friends playing it and introducing it to "non-gamers" who enjoyed it as much as those of us who played Squad Leader. I'd be loathe to call any of them "best" but there is certainly a market for entry-level and mass-appeal wargames. Platoon was another one that was popular with friends in high school though I think I only tried it once with them.

_____________________________

The Tactical Wargamer

(in reply to simovitch)

Post #: 70

RE: Best board-game? - 9/4/2007 5:37:39 AM

cdbeck

Posts: 1374
Joined: 8/16/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline

Hee hee... it is amazing that I didn't LOSE friends playing Diplomacy.

Some really nasty things done (which is why we rarely finished a game in nearly 7 hours of play).

My favorite board game is a sci fi game Twilight Imperium. So much fun, but it doesn't appeal to all. I would say the "perfect" board game is Settlers of Catan. Nearly anyone will play it, easy to get into, both cooperative and competitive, and even people way behind in points can win. It isn't a war board game per se, unless you think of it as economic warfare.

I also like History of the World. Much better than Risk, feels like you are playing a history book and points can fluctuate (meaning you don't have that "I'm always losing with no hope" effect).

None of these games is really "hardcore" (well maybe Twilight Imperium due to its unit variety, colonization of planets, and political simulation), but sometimes the best games are casual.

SoM

_____________________________

"Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet!"
(Kill them all. God will know his own.)

-- Arnaud-Armaury, the Albigensian Crusade

(in reply to madorosh)

Post #: 71

RE: Best board-game? - 9/10/2007 11:45:01 AM

WARHOG

Posts: 14
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline

Hands Down.
Squad Leader / Cross of Iron (AH) Easy to read, fun to play, great to learn.
ASL was overkill....

Flattop (Battleline) (not the AH version) Specific rules regarding each sides capabilities. Japanese torpedos, Luck die rolls, etc. I loved that game.....

(in reply to LarryP)

Post #: 72

RE: Best board-game? - 9/10/2007 2:31:30 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Michael Dorosh

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

I have to agre with the one who stated that Raid on St. Nazaire was the best sloitaire game ever

Subjective. If you're looking at replayability, I don't see how it could possibly compare to Ambush!, which was open-ended and in the end had 30+ different scenarios (including the three modules) and something like 10 map and half/map combinations. Compared to a single situation and single map. Is there really a comparison?

The programmed AI of Tokyo Express is touted as the "best" ever, even better than the paragraph driven system in Ambush! and seemed almost human in its ability to (seemingly) react to the actual human player's actions. How did Raid on St. Nazaire's AI compare?

So what makes St. Nazaire "best"? I would give it top marks for "biggest and most unwiedly and needlessly expensive mounted mapboard in human history", or perhaps "best magazine game that was actually sold as a bookcase game instead"... :)

I enjoyed the hell out of Ambush and it's sequals but replayability suffered once you had read the scripted paragraphs for the actions. I Also have the tank version of the series but the name escapes me at the moment. And yes, I can compare them as any game depicting "generic", "made up", fantasy scenarios will always, always take a back seat to a game that depicts a historical battle. Nothing in Ambush ever compared to the nail biting intensity of the attempt to get the flotilla through to the harbor without getting slaughtered in the process.

I'll agree that Tokoyo Express was an awesome game as well....I just rarely list naval games in the same category with land games....no reason....just an idiosyncrosy. Almost impossible to adequately compare the two AIs. At least for me.

As for unweildy, yea there was a run of games in that era by several publishers that used that fold out mounted map configuiration. The great artwork of the map was worth the unfolding effort alone.

(in reply to madorosh)

Post #: 73

RE: Best board-game? - 9/11/2007 7:36:50 AM

105mm Howitzer

Posts: 447
Joined: 8/9/2007
From: Montreal, Quebec
Status: offline

Not to forget Crescendo of Doom ( C.O.D.) All three games were also great for solo play.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WARHOG

Hands Down.
Squad Leader / Cross of Iron (AH) Easy to read, fun to play, great to learn.
ASL was overkill....

Flattop (Battleline) (not the AH version) Specific rules regarding each sides capabilities. Japanese torpedos, Luck die rolls, etc. I loved that game.....

_____________________________

"Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" - Publius Renatus, 390 A.D.

(in reply to WARHOG)

Post #: 74

RE: Best board-game? - 9/11/2007 9:15:28 AM

ilovestrategy

Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline

My favorite was StarFleet Battles. Man, there were some brutal battles in those tournaments...

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to ravinhood)

Post #: 75

RE: Best board-game? - 9/11/2007 12:18:03 PM

DoubleDeuce

Posts: 1247
Joined: 6/23/2000
From: Crossville, TN
Status: offline

I haven't seen them mentioned but I loved the AirForce/Dauntless games. Richtofen's War was good as well. As far as best though, I'd have to go with ASL.

(in reply to ilovestrategy)

Post #: 76

RE: Best board-game? - 9/12/2007 2:47:48 PM

Rainbow7

Posts: 404
Joined: 11/4/2003
From: Ottawa
Status: offline

If you loved Star Fleet Battles, there's a new streamlined game by the same company, called Federation Commander. Rules are much shorter, games are much quicker, and it's quite good.

_____________________________

Troubles overcome are good to tell. -Yiddish saying

Post #: 77

RE: Best board-game? - 9/12/2007 3:45:38 PM

Barthheart

Posts: 3194
Joined: 7/20/2004
From: Nepean, Ontario
Status: offline

One of our favourite games for a large group is Civilization by AH. Not really a wargame but we played it that way... very cut throat. There's a group in Sweden that have made a fantastic expansion for this game:

http://www.civproject.net/

We even had this new map printed up on a vinyl (beer proof) sheet thats 2.5' x 6'. Hand made new counters and cards.

Great fun.

_____________________________

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"

(in reply to Rainbow7)

Post #: 78

RE: Best board-game? - 9/12/2007 4:13:20 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twotribes

The Romans have Vercentrix (ok I have no idea how to spell his name) trapped

Vercingtorix

It was a very fun game....I have a copy on the shelf.

(in reply to Twotribes)

Post #: 79

RE: Best board-game? - 9/12/2007 9:30:34 PM

105mm Howitzer

Posts: 447
Joined: 8/9/2007
From: Montreal, Quebec
Status: offline

Ah yes, still got both, still collecting dust...They were truly aerial war classics. ( how about those mid-air collisions, eh?)
By the by, it's Vercingetorix, he lost at Alesia.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Double Deuce

I haven't seen them mentioned but I loved the AirForce/Dauntless games. Richtofen's War was good as well. As far as best though, I'd have to go with ASL.�

_____________________________

"Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" - Publius Renatus, 390 A.D.

(in reply to DoubleDeuce)

Post #: 80

RE: Best board-game? - 9/13/2007 8:08:30 AM

ilovestrategy

Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rainbow

If you loved Star Fleet Battles, there's a new streamlined game by the same company, called Federation Commander. Rules are much shorter, games are much quicker, and it's quite good.

Thats good to know! Thanks!

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to Rainbow7)

Post #: 81

RE: Best board-game? - 9/17/2007 9:18:54 AM

MrBoats

Posts: 135
Joined: 7/1/2004
Status: offline

The reminiscing about "Sniper" brought back a funny memory for me. My buddy and I played the hell out that game around '80 or so, and in one game I insisted that I could leapfrog a flamethrower shot over my soldier and into a building. He disagreed, violently, and we nearly came to blows over it. Looking back (with 27 years of wisdom added) I think I am prepared to admit that he was right. But part of me still believes a prone soldier could survive a jet of burning liquid passing above him! Joking aside, Sniper was a great game and I wish I still had it, along with the other 100 or so boardgames that got tossed along the way.

(in reply to ilovestrategy)

Post #: 82

RE: Best board-game? - 9/17/2007 9:25:52 AM

ilovestrategy

Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twotribes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hertston

It's hard to disagree with SL/ASL (or indeed chess!)... but I actually played an awful lot more Starfleet Battles.

I LOVED Starfleet battles. I always played the Klingons, absolutely sucked at it, but damn was I Brave. For those not in the know in that game the majority of the Klingon weapons are inferior to Starfleet weapons, your usual enemy. And your shields are not up to par for the required charge you have to make to bring your phaser 2's into killing range.

I still have around 100 board games rotting in my garage. I love war games.

Phaser 2's and disrupters FTW!

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to Twotribes)

Post #: 83

RE: Best board-game? - 9/17/2007 8:29:48 PM

MikeBrough

Posts: 260
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Scotland
Status: offline

Back in the 80s, I was a WWIII freak. I think I must have bought just about every related title. Favourites, in special order:

GDW's Third World War series.
Same publisher's Assault series.
Nato Division Commander
The Next War
Tac Air
Victory's Fleet series especially 2nd Fleet
Harpoon
Air & Armor
Air Strike
MBT
AIW
Firepower
Nordkapp/BAOR/Fifth Corps
Flight Leader

I want them ALL back. Sob.

_____________________________

Mike Brough
Proud to be an Arab

Be sceptical of the things you believe are false; be very sceptical of the things you believe are true.

(in reply to ilovestrategy)

Post #: 84

RE: Best board-game? - 9/17/2007 8:31:01 PM

MikeBrough

Posts: 260
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Scotland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MikeBrough

Favourites, in NO special order:

_____________________________

Mike Brough
Proud to be an Arab

Be sceptical of the things you believe are false; be very sceptical of the things you believe are true.

(in reply to MikeBrough)

Post #: 85

RE: Best board-game? - 9/17/2007 11:26:10 PM

morvwilson

Posts: 510
Joined: 11/30/2006
From: California
Status: offline

While not really a board game, one I spent a lot of time with was Challenger. We used 1/300 scale miniatures, and laid out the battle field on a ping pong table. 1"=50yards scale. we used squad leader mapboards inverted to simulate hills.
I still have a Russian armored division gathering dust in the garage, along with an Israeli brigade, British and French battallions.
Great fun there, somehow having one of your lead figure tanks flipped over as a wreck after taking a TOW missle was more heart rending then a squad leader counter.

(in reply to MikeBrough)

Post #: 86