cdbeck
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8/16/2005 From: Indiana Status: offline
|
To tell you the truth, those "low" marks on that chart don't mean what you think they mean. They are not 1 in a 1-5 "how good is it scale," they are how realistic is it "abstract-low" or "exactly like being in WWII high." How much do you have to worry about economy - "only one main resource number - low" or "you literally have to sign all of the government official's checks - high." Getting "low" isn't necessarily a criticism on that chart, it is to help compare the games. Some people can't stand HoI2 because it is literally like running a country and you get to chose between several esoteric and nearly-identical-to-the-layman types of vehicles and tanks when building your army. Some people can't stand Commander or Strategic Command because all you get is an abstract snub-nosed tiger looking tank for your armor choice. That chart said all were good, but all have different purposes. Still, wrong forum. Wrong beef. I agree with Hertson and Dredd. If this was a release patch, you can be mad (this is like posting a grievance because you didn't get accepted into say, the Tabula Rasa closed beta test). And Dredd is right, eventually you should just scrap a game and move on. I've done it more times than I would have liked. Master of Orion III, Ground Control II, WoW: Burning Crusade, the list goes on, but it just makes me start to cry... SoM
< Message edited by Son_of_Montfort -- 9/13/2007 6:53:17 AM >
_____________________________
"Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet!" (Kill them all. God will know his own.) -- Arnaud-Armaury, the Albigensian Crusade
|