Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Performance whingeing

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> Performance whingeing Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 12:18:29 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
OK, I wanted to give us (and more importantly, me) a place to whinge about aircraft performance outside the 'wish list' threads, so the developers don't get sumberged in inane gibbering about performance minutae while looking for more useful comments and suggestions.

Now some of this stuff may be required for fudging to achieve game balance, and if so, fair enough. But if the figures actually are relevant to RL performance....

1. MVR of the 109K-4 at 40? OK, it should be an outstanding performer for speed and climb, but surely the G-6 and 10 should be more maneuverable? Their MVR seems reasonable to me, but the K is too high.

2. On the same subject, I have a 4,900ft rate of climb for the K-4. Compare that to the Spit XIV on 3,000 ft per minute. Does not compute. In fact, the Spit RoC's all seem to be a little off - the Hurri IIC outclimbing the Spit Vb at 2,700 ft/min vs 2,666 ft/min? The Mustang outclimbing the Spit IX? The Spit should suffer for durability and range, but it - and specifically the IX and XIV - were relatively much better than that on the climb; IIRC the XIV should out-climb every other allied fighter until the F8F comes along (go on, HS, give us Bearcats....).

< Message edited by fochinell -- 9/13/2007 12:20:15 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 2:56:37 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Give me a break 

the numbers in BTR are not the numbers in EDtBTR

you should know I alway was of the camp of the K being too MRV (it was a lead slead, fast but once up to speed, that is all it could do, go fast)(which is not to say it is shabby, just not as good as the late Spits)

in fact, the Spits have the highest MRV of all planes in the game (if I could waggle a way to get the Yak 3 into the game, we may have some arguements)(but that would have a Alt limit on it, so still not the same)

(top MRV plane for the GE is the TA 152 both of them)

plus I have most late war Spits with a 4600 climb Rate

(top climber is the Me 163, now talk about a lead slead !!!!)(about the same for the K and the late Spits)

Besides, if most of the Spit Data didn't come from you, you are the cause of me digging deeper into the stats to make them work :)

(now, while I am a fan of the Bearcat, if I was going to add any planes, just to say I could add planes, I would have to go with a F4U4 and or the A-1 (talk about a terror for a Panzer Div on the move !!!!)






_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 2
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 2:58:06 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
LOL

too many finger waggers, that hurts my eyes




_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 3
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 3:11:15 PM   
Javakamp


Posts: 172
Joined: 2/17/2004
From: Lakeland, FL.
Status: offline
Would it be possiable to post the latest plane list? I know I saw one at one time, but I can't find it.

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 4
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 3:27:01 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
oh, you just want to see me get yelled at

here is a list, but it don't have any of the stats, be too many screen shots to try and get a complete listing of stats, and just in case, list may not be complete and or some may not end up making it as is, or and

6   Bf 109G-2          
7   Bf 109G-5          
8   Bf 109G-6          
9   Bf 109G-6/R6       
11  Bf 109G-10         
12  Bf 109G-10/R6      
13  Bf 109G-14         
14  Bf 109G-14/R6      
15  Bf 109H-2          
16  Bf 109K-4          
17  Bf 109K-6          
18  Bf 109T-2          
30  Do 335A-0          
31  Do 335A            
32  Do 335B            
33  Do 335A-6          
36  FW 190A-5          
38  FW 190A-6          
39  FW 190A-6/R1       
40  FW 190A-8          
41  FW 190A-8/R1       
42  FW 190A-8/R7       
43  FW 190A-8/R8       
46  FW 190D-9          
52  G.55/I Centauro    
53  G.56               
62  Ju 88C-6a          
64  MC.200 Saetta      
65  MC.202 Folgore     
66  MC.205 Veltro      
71  Dar-11 Ljastuvka   
72  Avia B.534         
73  G.50bis Freccia    
74  D.520              
75  He 112B-2          
76  IAR 81M            
77  MS 406             
78  Bf 109Ga-2         
79  Bf 109Ga-6         
81  FW 190F            
84  FW 190G            
89  Re.2001 Falco II   
90  Re.2002 Ariete     
91  Re.2005 Archer     
94  RO 57bis           
96  SAI.207            
109 Ta 152C            
110 Ta 152H            
121 Bf 110G-2          
122 Bf 110G-2/R3       
123 Me 210C            
124 Me 410A-1          
125 Me 410A-1/U2       
126 Me 410B-2/R3       
127 Me 410B-2/R5       
128 Me 410B-2/U2       
129 Me 410B-2/U4       
131 Bf 109G-6/U4N      
133 FW 190A-5/U2       
145 Bf 110G-4          
146 Bf 110G-4/M1       
148 Bf 110G-4/R7       
149 Bf 110G-4/R8       
152 CV F.5             
153 Do 217J-2          
154 Do 217N-2          
158 He 219A-0/R2       
159 He 219A-2/R1       
160 He 219A-5/R4       
164 Ju 88C-6           
166 Ju 88G             
168 Ju 388             
169 Me 262B            
170 Re.2001CN          
173 Ta 154             
176 He 162A            
177 Me 163B            
178 Me 262A            
179 Me 262A-1a/U4      
202 Beaufighter VIF    
203 Mosquito N.F.II    
204 Mosquito N.F.XII   
205 Mosquito N.F.XIII  
206 Mosquito N.F.XIX   
207 Mosquito N.F.30    
209 P-61A Black Widow  
215 Wellington III     
216 Wellington X       
219 Stirling I         
220 Stirling III       
223 Halifax II         
224 Halifax III        
227 Lancaster I        
228 Lancaster III      
230 Mosquito F.B.VI    
231 Mosquito B.IV      
232 Mosquito B.XVI     
235 Spitfire PR.IV     
236 Spitfire PR.XI     
237 Spitfire FR.XIVE   
238 Spitfire PR.XIX    
240 Mosquito PR.XVI    
242 F-5A Lightning     
243 F-5C Lightning     
246 F-6A Mustang       
247 F-6D Mustang       
262 Baltimore V        
264 Boston III         
265 Boston IIIA        
266 A-20G Havoc        
269 Mitchell II        
270 Mitchell III       
273 B-25D Mitchell     
274 B-25J Mitchell     
276 B-26B Marauder     
277 B-26G Marauder     
278 Marauder III       
279 A-26B Invader      
282 B-17F Fortress     
283 B-17G Fortress     
286 B-24D Liberator    
287 B-24J Liberator    
291 P-39Q Airacobra    
293 Kittyhawk III      
294 Kittyhawk IV       
295 P-40F Warhawk      
296 P-40L Warhawk      
304 P-38H Lightning    
306 P-38J Lightning    
308 P-38L Lightning    
312 P-47D-6 Thunderbolt
314 P-47D-15 Thunderbolt
315 P-47D-20 Thunderbolt
316 P-47D-25 Thunderbolt
317 P-47M Thunderbolt  
318 XP-72 UltraBolt    
320 P-51B Mustang      
321 P-51D Mustang      
325 Spitfire LF.VB     
326 Spitfire LF.VC     
327 Spitfire HF.VII    
328 Spitfire LF.VIII   
329 Spitfire F.IX      
330 Spitfire LF.IXC    
331 Spitfire HF.IX     
332 Spitfire LF.IXE    
333 Spitfire LF.XII    
334 Spitfire F.XIV     
335 Spitfire F.XIVE    
337 Tempest V          
339 Mustang I          
340 Mustang IA         
341 Mustang III        
342 Mustang IV         
344 Yak 9DD            
346 Wellington RCM     
347 Stirling RCM       
348 Halifax RCM        
349 Mosquito RCM       
350 Fortress RCM       
351 Liberator RCM      
353 Hurricane IV       
354 Whirlwind IA       
355 Typhoon IB         
356 A-36A Apache       
358 Meteor I           
359 Meteor III         
362 MC.202 Folgore     
363 MC.205 Veltro      
364 P-39Q Airacobra    
365 Re.2002 Ariete     


_____________________________


(in reply to Javakamp)
Post #: 5
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 3:34:43 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
oh, and just in case, if you see something with a A-0, that means it is a preproduction model

which allows me to bring in some plane types when the test unit came in, but still keep the production model tied down to the real/with in reason real start date

oh, and just in case, some of the GE models, are really, just the R pak that the model can become, so saying, a Bf 109G-6 can become the Bf 109G-6/R6 (and back)




_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 6
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 3:56:28 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
Give me a break

the numbers in BTR are not the numbers in EDtBTR


Just give me a P-47N to play with and I'll leave you alone...

[snip agreed stuff]

(top climber is the Me 163, now talk about a lead slead !!!!)(about the same for the K and the late Spits)

Spits as lead sleds? Hey, don't make me come over there

(now, while I am a fan of the Bearcat, if I was going to add any planes, just to say I could add planes, I would have to go with a F4U4 and or the A-1 (talk about a terror for a Panzer Div on the move !!!!)

Now that would be kewl

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 7
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 4:12:43 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fochinell

Give me a break

the numbers in BTR are not the numbers in EDtBTR


Just give me a P-47N to play with and I'll leave you alone...

Gotten some back and forths on if we should add the N, timing is right, place and need is wrong, but

[snip agreed stuff]

(top climber is the Me 163, now talk about a lead slead !!!!)(about the same for the K and the late Spits)

Spits as lead sleds? Hey, don't make me come over there

you misread my statement (easy to do) I meant the K and late Spits are about the same for Climb Rate


(now, while I am a fan of the Bearcat, if I was going to add any planes, just to say I could add planes, I would have to go with a F4U4 and or the A-1 (talk about a terror for a Panzer Div on the move !!!!)

Now that would be kewl




_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 8
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/13/2007 4:21:55 PM   
Javakamp


Posts: 172
Joined: 2/17/2004
From: Lakeland, FL.
Status: offline
Thaks for the list Sarge.

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 9
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/14/2007 2:36:46 AM   
harley


Posts: 1700
Joined: 10/13/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fochinell

1. MVR of the 109K-4 at 40? OK, it should be an outstanding performer for speed and climb, but surely the G-6 and 10 should be more maneuverable? Their MVR seems reasonable to me, but the K is too high.


Just remember that the Maneuver rating is derived from a combination of roll rate, turn rate, acceleration, dive performance, stall envelope, visibility, pilot controllability... it's essentially a mashup that should be more represented by something like "fighting ability" or "dogfight performance"...



_____________________________

gigiddy gigiddy gig-i-ddy

(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 10
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/14/2007 4:21:05 AM   
RyanCrierie


Posts: 1461
Joined: 10/14/2005
Status: offline
XP-72 UltraBolt !!!

Thankyew so much

Hey Hard Sarge, what about the ULTIMATE P-51, or the Ta-152xx Series?

Linka

The ultimate version of the Mustang was the P-51H, which was the fastest Mustang variant to see service and one of the fastest (if not the fastest) piston-engined fighters to enter production during the Second World War. However, it was destined never to see any combat, having entered service too late to participate in the final action against Japan.

...

Pilots generally found the P-51H to be even more delightful to fly than the D model. However, some pilots were distrustful of the H's lighter structure, preferring the greater sturdiness of the D. Consequently, it was not considered as being suitable for combat operations in Korea.

Specs of the P-51H-5-NA:

One Packard Merlin V-1650-9 twelve-cylinder Vee liquid cooled engine rated at 1380 hp for takeoff and a a war emergency power of 2218 hp at 10,200 feet and 1900 hp at 20,000 feet with water injection. Performance: Maximum speed was 444 mph at 5000 feet, 463 mph at 15,000 feet, and 487 mph at 25,000 feet. Range in clean condition was 755 miles at 359 mph at 10,000 feet, 1975 miles at 239 mph at 10,000 feet. Range with two 62.5 Imp. gall. drop tanks was 1150 miles at 339 mph at 10,000 feet and 1530 miles at 243 mph at 10,000 feet. An altitude of 5000 feet could be reached in 1.5 minutes, 15,000 feet in 5 minutes. Service ceiling was 41,600 feet. Weights: 6585 pounds empty, 9500 pounds normal loaded, and 11,500 pounds maximum. Dimensions: Wing span was 37 feet 0 inches, length was 33 feet 4 inches, height was 8 feet 10 inches, and wing area was 235 square feet.

--------

Or the YB-xx "Gunship" versions of the B-17 and B-24?

I know I know i know, lol, but we can dream

< Message edited by RyanCrierie -- 9/14/2007 4:25:51 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to harley)
Post #: 11
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/14/2007 2:51:39 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
Just remember that the Maneuver rating is derived from a combination of roll rate, turn rate, acceleration, dive performance, stall envelope, visibility, pilot controllability... it's essentially a mashup that should be more represented by something like "fighting ability" or "dogfight performance"...

Understood, but I agree with HS on this one; the K might be equivalent to the G if the better climb and acceleration are taken into account alongside the K's higher intertia and unpleasant handling, but I don't think it should be better unless the MVR needs to cover the RoC, where the K should outdoubtedly be better. But you're the guys to call that one.




(in reply to harley)
Post #: 12
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/14/2007 4:30:35 PM   
menik


Posts: 45
Joined: 12/18/2006
From: Patrimonium Petri (Italy)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge



53 G.56

g56 never saw any action: I suppose it is available only in the "wath if"

and what about Cr 42?


quote:

Cr


_____________________________

Antrocom Online Journal of Anthropology:
www.antrocom.net

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 13
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/14/2007 8:26:35 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
the G56 is more a relic from the old boards and what was wanted if we could get something added, it is in the game, but not planned on being used, but, it can be built if the player, AI wants to use up factory space for it

the Cr 42 was pretty much used up by this date, plus the IT/CO-Axis have enough planes that the player/AI is going to be doing nothing but trying to replace already

the YBs would be fun to add, but they do not work right in the game, you would need to have a full Squadron/Bomb Group to use them


_____________________________


(in reply to menik)
Post #: 14
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/17/2007 1:52:23 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
Hard Sarge,

Nice to see the extensive list of Italian planes.  Planes such as the SAI.207 (inter alia) are rarely seen.

I assume the list is the aggregated list of planes available for both time periods (BOB and BTR).  If not why is there duplication eg

Re.2002 Ariete appears as #90 and #365
MC.202 Folgore appears as #65 and #362
MC.205 Veltro appears as #66 and #363
P-39Q Airacobra appears as #291 and #364

Alfred

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 15
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/17/2007 2:24:47 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Hard Sarge,

Nice to see the extensive list of Italian planes. Planes such as the SAI.207 (inter alia) are rarely seen.

I assume the list is the aggregated list of planes available for both time periods (BOB and BTR). If not why is there duplication eg

Re.2002 Ariete appears as #90 and #365
MC.202 Folgore appears as #65 and #362
MC.205 Veltro appears as #66 and #363
P-39Q Airacobra appears as #291 and #364

Alfred



well, long story short type stuff

there are two listing as there are some plane models that are Axis and Allied

the P-39 is a Allied Fighter when it is in the game for the US, when the Balkan AirForce comes in, it will be a Fighterbomber, so that is why it has two models (it is planned that most of them will come from the Allied Stockpile of planes, but I may make it a little different model number, so it is not so confusing if you don't know what I have planned)

and no, this is the BTR Plane list, BoB has its own list as does BoB41 (BTR and BTR44 have the same list)


_____________________________


(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 16
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/19/2007 12:16:04 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
Hard Sarge,

Nice detail to include the Italian Co-Belligerent.  That explains the duplicate planes.  Is there any room to give them an Italian native bomber or will they be equipped with Marylands?

Alfred 

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 17
RE: Performance whingeing - 9/19/2007 6:04:47 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
I wanted to give them the SM 79, but they used the IT bombers as transports, the combat bombers were the Marylands, so had to give that to them instead




_____________________________


(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 18
RE: Performance whingeing - 10/9/2007 6:30:00 PM   
Peter Fisla


Posts: 2503
Joined: 10/5/2001
From: Canada
Status: offline
I'm a big Bf-109 fan .... would it be possible to add two following planes please ?

Bf-109 G6/AS
Bf-109 G-14/AS

Thanks!

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 19
RE: Performance whingeing - 10/10/2007 12:28:57 AM   
Denniss

 

Posts: 7902
Joined: 1/10/2002
From: Germany, Hannover (region)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Peter Fisla

I'm a big Bf-109 fan .... would it be possible to add two following planes please ?

Bf-109 G6/AS
Bf-109 G-14/AS

Thanks!


The G-6/AS is probably modeled via the G-5 (to be a G-5/AS although not named as such), at least that's the setup in JC's OOB for the "old" BTR. With the G-10 on hand you won't need the G-14/AS.

(in reply to Peter Fisla)
Post #: 20
RE: Performance whingeing - 10/10/2007 1:26:02 AM   
jcjordan

 

Posts: 1900
Joined: 6/27/2001
Status: offline
Well since you're going to add a F4U how about going a step further & do the F2G now there's some power out front there & where's the P80???

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 21
RE: Performance whingeing - 10/10/2007 2:44:21 AM   
pad152

 

Posts: 2871
Joined: 4/23/2000
Status: offline
Aircraft list

Where are the following?
B17E The first version of the B17 used by the 8th airforce in 1942!
P47C Jan 1943 through mid to 1943 8th air force
P38F mid 1942 used by some groups until 1943
P38G ?
P40N ?

Why Meteor I & III and no P80? (no allied jets saw combat but, the P80's in Italy were just weeks away from going operational before end of the war in europe.



(in reply to jcjordan)
Post #: 22
RE: Performance whingeing - 10/10/2007 3:56:39 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline
Meteor I's saw combat against V-1's in 1944, and Meteor III's flew ground attack and "armed reconaissance" (ie wander around shooting up anythign you find) missions from Belgium and Germany in 1945 getting credit for some german a/c destroyed on the ground - ref "Meteor in Action, Sqn/Signal pub, various web pages eg http://www.wingweb.co.uk/aircraft/Gloster_Meteor.html

(in reply to pad152)
Post #: 23
RE: Performance whingeing - 10/10/2007 4:37:34 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pad152

Aircraft list

Where are the following?
B17E The first version of the B17 used by the 8th airforce in 1942!
the game starts in Aug of 43 ?, time line is pretty much done with this plane
P47C Jan 1943 through mid to 1943 8th air force
well again, the first D's were coming off the production lines early in 43, by fall of 43, most of the C's on the books were upgraded or in the process of being upgraded to D's standard (now some C's were still on the books and flying in mid 44, but they were no longer C's other then in Block number)
P38F mid 1942 used by some groups until 1943
again, way out of the timeline, the G is already a outdated model by the time the game starts
P38G ?
the G and the H are too close to being the same plane, and with the G already on the way out, the H is really the only model needed
P40N ?
well, to an extent, the N is in as the IV, and while some 5000 were built, it was more a landlease and PTO model then a ETO model

Why Meteor I & III and no P80? (no allied jets saw combat but, the P80's in Italy were just weeks away from going operational before end of the war in europe.

the biggest hassle with the P-80 right now, is stats, most stats for the plane, are based on what it could do in Korea, not what it was doing in 45, I find better info on this plane, I be more then happy to add it in




for the 109G6/AS and 109G14/AS it is more in how they used them, then in not likeing or wanting them, I do not find much were they were used Gruppen sized units

I am a little on the fence on these, I could "add" a new engine type, and frame, which would then mean more split factories to build these, would leave off the Paks, as they should be seen as High Alt fighters, but with weaker firepower then could be used with the plain models (but, it is going to be a bugger trying to keep all the engines and frames lined up as it is)





_____________________________


(in reply to pad152)
Post #: 24
RE: Performance whingeing - 10/11/2007 12:57:53 AM   
Peter Fisla


Posts: 2503
Joined: 10/5/2001
From: Canada
Status: offline
Bf-109 G-5 in the game is it actually using the DB605 AS engine ? Because if it's not then it should be a bit heavier and not necessarily faster than your standard G-6 since G-5 is basically G-6 with pressurized cockpit.

Unfortunately I believe there were only 50 G-5/AS so I don't see the point of implementing them...but I would like to see G-6/AS (with or without MW50 system) added into the engine with DB06 AS engine; total about 686 produced - 226 new produced and rest conversion form G-6. The G-14/AS (with or without MW50 system) - about 1000 were produced. The G-10 btw uses DB 605 AS, DB 605 ASM, DB 605 D, DB 605 DB and DB 605 DC last two also possibly with MW50 system. What DB 605 engines do you currently support in the game for the Gustav fighters - Hard Sarge ?

Granted the G-6/AS and G-14/AS were mixed with regular G-6 and G-14 in Luftwaffe Gruppen but I would still very much welcome both of these planes in the game....if it isn't too much work for you. I would simply just go with G-6/AS once they would be available and simply stop producing regular G-6. The G-6/AS arrives first then G-14/AS and then very closely G-10. You wouldn't really need to add new frames...granted the G-14/AS oil cooler is not the same as G-10 oil cooler but from game perspective you could use G-10 frames, just add new engines. If you need some performance data let me know I have some original Daimler Benz German PDF with some basic information about each BD 605 engine type.

Anyways my opinion only :)


< Message edited by Peter Fisla -- 10/11/2007 1:07:57 AM >

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 25
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> Performance whingeing Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.328