High Command
Posts: 38
Joined: 3/2/2006 Status: offline
|
The vertion of Tojo i refered to is of course the same as I currently have, or it would not be possible to compere them. The 4 Bombers that made it throu, if it were ment to be so, should made it throu without being fired upon by 32 Fighters, so this is not DL, as the 32 Fighters actualy did fire upon them (all the first day) and it without them losing a singel bomber. I think some here semes to not have acces to real world information or documentation, so it is hard to discuss this topic with you as you simply lack the neccesary knowlage on the subject. The Historicle Examples above is from WW2 and Pacific Theater, i see for example one is commenting on the Lancasters, thay were Chinese, not British, i thought that was common knowlage. Anyway thair are over 2000 air engagements pr year in the Pacific, i have rewieved maby 150. Now thats not alot compered to how many missions and engagements it was, i know that, but it is after my opinion enugth to get a impression. Im sure evan half of you havent evan red a real world Air to Air Combat Report, so what is your guessings worth when you try to present historicle data? You must not mix what you think or have heared about with facts, facts is informrmation that is not based on opinions or enturpetations. So if you talk about facts, stick to facts, dont mix this computer based game with realety. In realety Japan would never invaded India due to Political reasons, I did that. So lets seperate the two things. The link is that this game tryes to simulate realety, and it is realy poor in that, espesialy the Air to Air modell in CHS 160 - Experimental Air to Air modell. I see alot of the ones replaying here are real WITP fanboys, Im sure you are going to be real objective and stick to historical facts and USAF or IJAA Inteligance or Statistic Combat Reports. If not, a historicle arguement can not be taken into consideration as it will be based on a opinion and not on documentation. Come with some real world documentation and ill take a look at it, but intill then the conclution is very simple, this Air to Air modell, does not correspond with the Statistics of the USAF. lol CHS160 has moddeled the P47D as more manuvreble then the Zero for crist, do we need to say more? I rest my case!
< Message edited by High Command -- 10/21/2007 3:08:20 PM >
_____________________________
ACCOUNT TO BE DELEATED
|