Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Patch 1.02B things...

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Carriers At War >> Patch 1.02B things... Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Patch 1.02B things... - 11/29/2007 2:01:43 PM   
Ophion

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline 		Thanks very much for the chance to test the new patch!

Found it really good, especially Tarawa, but there were a few things I thought I should raise. Note this is from playing 1 scenario of Tarawa in "Mystery Variant" as Japan.

1) Landbase squadron transfer does not seem to work - you can select a landbase to transfer to but the launch button does not appear.

2) Torpedo animations in surface combat take ages, even with "Fast animation" selected.

3) Game seems to run a bit slower than it used to, but that may be my computer and the sheer amount of mayhem that was occuring...
Post #: 1
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 11/29/2007 2:46:27 PM   
Blond_Knight


Posts: 1031
Joined: 5/15/2004
Status: offline 		4) Can we have the option to use our default cursor instead of the the custom one in the game?

(in reply to Ophion)
Post #: 2
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 11/30/2007 12:01:35 AM   
alexs


Posts: 417
Joined: 8/27/2003
From: Sydney
Status: offline 		1) I'll look into this one.
2) Yep, the torpedo animations have always taken a long time - i'll try to look for ways to increase their speed.
3) Not sure about this one. Nothing i've added with the latest patch should cause a real slowdown.


Blond Knight - If you want to use default windows cursors, try removing the "Cursors.srf" file from the Game\Resources folder and placing it in the game folder instead (so the resource system wont find it). This should cause the game cursors not to be found, and the default windows one's to be used.


_____________________________

AlexS
SSG
Support@ssg.com.au

(in reply to Blond_Knight)
Post #: 3
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 11/30/2007 5:59:23 AM   
Blond_Knight


Posts: 1031
Joined: 5/15/2004
Status: offline 		If you want to use default windows cursors, try removing the "Cursors.srf" file from the Game\Resources folder and placing it in the game folder instead (so the resource system wont find it). This should cause the game cursors not to be found, and the default windows one's to be used.

That did it.  Thank You very much.

(in reply to alexs)
Post #: 4
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/2/2007 2:16:10 PM   
Ophion

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline 		Quick update having played a couple more times:
1) This issue is still here.
3) Runs fine now. Probably just me...

And a new one:
5) In the task group status screen you can't close it using the little "x" in the top right. You need to close it by hitting the TG status screen button at the bottom of the screen again.

(in reply to Blond_Knight)
Post #: 5
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/2/2007 7:07:24 PM   
CapnDarwin


Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline 		I ran 102B last night and I'm seeing a small number of at least US platforms were the information blurb on weapons, etc is runnning to the right out of the "box" and off screen in some cases. Tarawa scenario, B-24's was one of the offenders. I do like the "planes on deck notice". I would be nice to see a "Hi/Lo CAP Encountered" "No CAP Encountered" as well. Land base attacks still need something more visual or at least more details as the the BDA (can be fuzzy for FOW purposes). Other then that I really enjoy the game. Thanks for the continued effort.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to Ophion)
Post #: 6
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/3/2007 1:37:53 AM   
Joe D.


Posts: 4004
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: Stratford, Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ophion

... And a new one:
5) In the task group status screen you can't close it using the little "x" in the top right. You need to close it by hitting the TG status screen button at the bottom of the screen again.


Ditto that.


_____________________________

Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.

"The Angel of Okinawa"

Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II

(in reply to Ophion)
Post #: 7
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/3/2007 3:30:13 AM   
alexs


Posts: 417
Joined: 8/27/2003
From: Sydney
Status: offline 		Hi Guys,
Thanks for the reports -

i've tracked down the issue where landbase squadrons wouldnt transfer and also fixed the disabled 'x' close button in the taskgroup screen.

Cheers
Alex



_____________________________

AlexS
SSG
Support@ssg.com.au

(in reply to Joe D.)
Post #: 8
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/3/2007 7:48:11 AM   
Ophion

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline 		Thanks Alex!

Not to try to be a problem, but the sqn transfer issue also affects carrier squadrons too (not sure if fixing one will fix the other).


(in reply to alexs)
Post #: 9
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/3/2007 8:36:53 AM   
alexs


Posts: 417
Joined: 8/27/2003
From: Sydney
Status: offline 		Yep - the squadron transfer flag (called "Ship to shore transfer") in the squadrons editor was supposed to limit which squadrons could transfer from a carrier to a landbase. I got a little overzealous in the programming and decided the flag applied to all transfers instead of just transfers from a carrier.

You'll see that the final patch will still have the carrier to landbase restrictions where the scenario designer has designated that the squadron is not "ship to shore" capable.

Alex


_____________________________

AlexS
SSG
Support@ssg.com.au

(in reply to Ophion)
Post #: 10
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/5/2007 1:13:15 AM   
teddys

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 12/5/2007
Status: offline 		Carriers at war version 1.02 – Beta 1. In the editor all the scenarios except Tarawa, under edit countries, all the options not set. They are (0 hopeless) or ( 100 nm). In the manual you are told to set them.
IS this a problem unique to my setup or are they suppose to be not set?

(in reply to alexs)
Post #: 11
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/6/2007 3:17:25 PM   
RyanCrierie


Posts: 1461
Joined: 10/14/2005
Status: offline 		Question; will the Manual be updated for 1.02 to explain HOW to edit and set up maps/scenarios better? As it is now, making maps/scenarios is sort of a very hit and miss process...

_____________________________

My Website with cool bits and pieces!

(in reply to teddys)
Post #: 12
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/7/2007 12:14:15 AM   
Gregor_SSG


Posts: 681
Joined: 3/6/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: teddys

Carriers at war version 1.02 – Beta 1. In the editor all the scenarios except Tarawa, under edit countries, all the options not set. They are (0 hopeless) or ( 100 nm). In the manual you are told to set them.
IS this a problem unique to my setup or are they suppose to be not set?



Those scenario are using the data from the old CAW scenarios, which until v1.02 could not be edited. The release version 1.02 patch will include updated versions of all scenarios where the country data can be properly edited and will show the actual, correct values being used.

Gregor

_____________________________

Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.

(in reply to teddys)
Post #: 13
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/7/2007 12:17:11 AM   
Gregor_SSG


Posts: 681
Joined: 3/6/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RyanCrierie

Question; will the Manual be updated for 1.02 to explain HOW to edit and set up maps/scenarios better? As it is now, making maps/scenarios is sort of a very hit and miss process...


If you look inside the folder named Cape Matapan that the patch installed, you will find the Editor Tutorial document which attempts to explain working with Ships, Planes and Maps and has some template files.

If there's anything that's not explained by that, let me know and I'll work up something to cover it.

Gregor

_____________________________

Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.

(in reply to RyanCrierie)
Post #: 14
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/7/2007 3:58:55 PM   
RyanCrierie


Posts: 1461
Joined: 10/14/2005
Status: offline 		If there's anything that's not explained by that, let me know and I'll work up something to cover it.

Okay.

Once the Hex Map is complete, hit the Save Map to File button. This will create a bitmap in .BMP format, which you can then use as a basis for creating the display bitmap that the users will see.

This is completely backwards.

You can easily generate highly accurate bitmaps using freeware GIS software such as MICRODEM, which can be scaled to the exact scale you need for CAW; such as this one:



In the original release of CAW; you could actually "paint" the hex types over the bitmap; e.g. your hex type would appear OVER your bitmap, making maps easy.

However, with the first patch to CAW, that "feature" went away, and you cannot change the hex types until you flick to the hex map completely like so:



Which lends it self to major errors and tediousness in flipping back and forth.


_____________________________

My Website with cool bits and pieces!

(in reply to Gregor_SSG)
Post #: 15
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/8/2007 2:00:28 AM   
alexs


Posts: 417
Joined: 8/27/2003
From: Sydney
Status: offline 		Hi Ryan,
That option exists (albeit only internally for us at the moment). I've moved it to the general options file, and also added a slider on the map editor screen to control it.
I've also added a hotkey to toggle the 'show map hex surface' (hit the 's' key) so you can quickly flick between the 2 if thats your thing.

It will be released in the final v1.02 patch.

Alex


_____________________________

AlexS
SSG
Support@ssg.com.au

(in reply to RyanCrierie)
Post #: 16
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 12/10/2007 2:13:30 PM   
CapnDarwin


Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline 		Just as an FYI, I posted two bugs in the support forum on 102B.

Thanks.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to alexs)
Post #: 17
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/3/2008 12:19:16 AM   
Buck Beach

 

Posts: 1973
Joined: 6/25/2000
From: Upland,CA,USA
Status: offline 		Is there any chance of getting any optional color pallet?   I am red/green color blind and the Japanese TG practically disappear on the main screen.  I sure wish that game companies would remember there are a high percentage of people who have color vision problems.

(in reply to CapnDarwin)
Post #: 18
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/3/2008 12:21:04 AM   
Buck Beach

 

Posts: 1973
Joined: 6/25/2000
From: Upland,CA,USA
Status: offline 		I mentioned under the support thread a request for tech help the issue of cursor problems.  Is there any help to be found here?

< Message edited by Buck Beach -- 1/3/2008 12:23:03 AM >

(in reply to Buck Beach)
Post #: 19
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/3/2008 3:40:04 AM   
sullafelix

 

Posts: 1520
Joined: 1/11/2005
Status: offline 		Sorry to but in, But , does this mean that in this new patch there will be all the scenarios from the original compilation? Thanks.

(in reply to Buck Beach)
Post #: 20
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/5/2008 12:35:36 AM   
Gregor_SSG


Posts: 681
Joined: 3/6/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sulla05

Sorry to but in, But , does this mean that in this new patch there will be all the scenarios from the original compilation? Thanks.


No, but there is a brand new scenario, Tarawa, complete with all the mystery variations.

Gregor

_____________________________

Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.

(in reply to sullafelix)
Post #: 21
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/5/2008 4:02:09 AM   
sullafelix

 

Posts: 1520
Joined: 1/11/2005
Status: offline 		I saw your mention of a " Matapan " folder and began drooling. I own the newv CAW and have played it many times but I've never read about or opened the editor. Which is really surprising because I spent many many hours fiddling with the original game editor.

Now for the shameless plug. I have bought every game except Battles in Normandy you've ever made going back to the commodore and also all the run 5 magazines. The few times I had a problem or question your company has been the nicest and most responsive I've ever dealt with. Keep up the great work. May everyone who bashed the new CAW rot somewhere not nice.



(in reply to Gregor_SSG)
Post #: 22
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/7/2008 12:51:29 AM   
Gregor_SSG


Posts: 681
Joined: 3/6/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sulla05

I saw your mention of a " Matapan " folder and began drooling. I own the newv CAW and have played it many times but I've never read about or opened the editor. Which is really surprising because I spent many many hours fiddling with the original game editor.

Now for the shameless plug. I have bought every game except Battles in Normandy you've ever made going back to the commodore and also all the run 5 magazines. The few times I had a problem or question your company has been the nicest and most responsive I've ever dealt with. Keep up the great work. May everyone who bashed the new CAW rot somewhere not nice.





I have used both Editors and the new CAW editor is a vast improvement on the old one. It's even better now in v1.02 as Alex has had a chance to make further refinements. It's so easy to see what forces are in each TG, and what the WarRoom actions are that I would urge everybody with any interest in scenario creation to take a look. In the Cape Matapan tutorial I've added comments to many of the WarCards to explain what the AI actions are intended to do and also referred to the manual for further info, so it's clear to see what the AI plan is.

Gregor

_____________________________

Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.

(in reply to sullafelix)
Post #: 23
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/8/2008 8:50:19 PM   
Unhappy

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 6/9/2007
Status: offline 		I'm sure this is the wrong time to bring it up what with the imminent (?) arrival of the new patch, but I don't suppose there was a chance to add an air attack conditional effect? (For example - to make an air attack on a landbase or port a requirement of victory). It would really come in handy when creating scenarios.

Thanks.

(in reply to Ophion)
Post #: 24
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/9/2008 12:25:06 AM   
Gregor_SSG


Posts: 681
Joined: 3/6/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Unhappy

I'm sure this is the wrong time to bring it up what with the imminent (?) arrival of the new patch, but I don't suppose there was a chance to add an air attack conditional effect? (For example - to make an air attack on a landbase or port a requirement of victory). It would really come in handy when creating scenarios.

Thanks.


It's definitely too late for the next patch and in any case I'm not sure how we would handle it. Missions such as bombardment and invasion/cargo delivery are handed to a TG, and since you can't deliberately split a TG then the whole TG has to be sent on a mission.

The question then arises, what constitutes an air attack. Can I just send a single plane? Does an attack have to do damage or is sending it enough? Is it time limited? Taking Midway as an example, what mechanism would stop me from first crushing the US TGs and then bombing Midway later?

As you can see there are lots of questions to answer, and if its all designed just to recreate one morning at Midway, then I'm not sure its worth the effort. Do you have other situations in mind where it would be useful?

Gregor

_____________________________

Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.

(in reply to Unhappy)
Post #: 25
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 1/9/2008 1:13:55 AM   
Unhappy

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 6/9/2007
Status: offline 		Well, I think an air attack conditional would be quite useful in many circumstances. For example, I am working on a scenario now where the Japanese go out of their way to bomb Colombo and Trincomalee in Ceylon without even bothering to bring along bombardment or invasion forces...so it really complicates the victory conditions that there is no conditional effect for air attacks. Same could be said of the bombing of Darwin in Feb. 1942, the Doolittle Raid, etc. Suffice it to say I think it would be useful often and its absence makes it more difficult to create realistic and appropriate victory conditions.

As for how to do it...well yeah that would be difficult. I would settle for a conditional that was triggered by inflicting a set level of damage on a landbase (airfield). As it is now landbases possess one of 16 damage states (0-15). So the conditional could be triggered by inflicting enough damage on the landbase (via bombardment or air attack) to reach a specified level. For example, the conditional might require the player to damage the landbase to level 4 (moderate damage) or level 7 (serious damage) or level 10 (critical damage) etc. This would be fun and useful because it would likely require multiple air strikes to inflict critical damage on the landbase. Points could be rewarded upon completion etc. as with existing conditionals.

< Message edited by Unhappy -- 2/8/2008 12:15:29 AM >

(in reply to Gregor_SSG)
Post #: 26
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 2/8/2008 12:17:19 AM   
Unhappy

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 6/9/2007
Status: offline 		...I'm bumping this because I'm still interested to know whether an air attack conditional is a possibility someday in the future.

Thanks.

(in reply to Gregor_SSG)
Post #: 27
RE: Patch 1.02B things... - 2/8/2008 1:11:50 AM   
Gregor_SSG


Posts: 681
Joined: 3/6/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Unhappy

...I'm bumping this because I'm still interested to know whether an air attack conditional is a possibility someday in the future.

Thanks.


I will talk to Ian Trout about it and see what he thinks, he is the ultimate authority on such matters.

Gregor

_____________________________

Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.

(in reply to Unhappy)
Post #: 28
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Carriers At War >> Patch 1.02B things... Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.719