Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/21/2008 11:29:10 PM   
Dive Bomber1

 

Posts: 670
Joined: 10/30/2006
Status: offline
I still have one pbem going; this one against another strong opponent who happens to live in China. I started this pbem in the same fashion as my pbem against AuTiger, but the difference was that I had PDU set to "on", and I started it later than my game against AuTiger so I was able to correct many mistakes earlier against my Chinese opponent than I did in the pbem against AuTiger.

Never-the-less, the fundamental critical flaws in my strategy were still the same and resulted in a similar situation wherein I found myself over-expanded, out of supply, out of good pilots, out of good planes and generally stalemated everywhere by mid-1942. (For example, my opponent has been able to hang on to Mandalay.) So I have been trying to recover ever since and it is now at the end of September 1942.

My air combat strategies have been particularly ineffectual in my pbems, so I decided very recently in this match to try to group my planes together by type in particular regions in order to take the best advantage of the varying ranges of my planes. Thus, in this pbem I ended up with all of my Tonys in Southeast Asia, and in particular, in Rahaeng.

My opponent has been very successfully emulating AuTiger's "Big Hammer" approach to keep my air fields demolished in the SEA and other regions by means of mass 4E bomber attacks. But thanks to weather and my opponent's decision to close first the bigger air bases in the region such as Rangoon, I was able to bring a number of decent Tony units to Rahaeng along with support troops.

So on September 28, 1942 my opponent got a break in the weather and was able to send a massive attack of 4Es from India against the air fields at Rahaeng:

Day Air attack on Rahaeng, at 31, 35

Japanese aircraft
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 76

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 65
LB-30 Liberator x 46
B-24D Liberator x 48


The 4Es came in at 20K feet.

The result was a Japanese fanboy's dream-come-true:

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 6 destroyed, 50 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 22 destroyed, 21 damaged
LB-30 Liberator: 16 destroyed, 14 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 16 destroyed, 16 damaged


The actual final results from the Intel Air Combat page were 25 B-17Es, 20 LB-30s and 20 B-24Ds shot down against the loss of 8 Tonys in A-to-A combat and 2 Tonys lost to operational damage.

Most of the 4Es aborted their missions and there was no damage on the ground.

Four of my IJA pilots became Aces out of this air battle.

So I will enjoy my brief moment of satisfaction until my opponent starts to get P-38s to send along on escort.
Post #: 1
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/21/2008 11:40:01 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Very nice.  The problem I find is that the Allied opponent can replace any number of planes you shoot down and the filled out squadrons will darken the skies in a day or two. 

Still, enjoy it.  It's a great morale boost.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Dive Bomber1)
Post #: 2
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 12:07:50 AM   
dekwik


Posts: 90
Joined: 9/22/2007
From: Atlanta
Status: offline
nice job! My Japanese AF has been getting serially spanked in simlar circumstances in two pbems. Are you listening Thomas and John?

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 4:59:52 AM   
Hornblower


Posts: 1361
Joined: 9/10/2003
From: New York'er relocated to Chicago
Status: offline
I don’t even know if the Luftwaffe shot down 65 bombers in on mission..   

(in reply to dekwik)
Post #: 4
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 12:25:23 PM   
lineartube

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 6/16/2008
From: Portugal
Status: offline
Considering that there were German aces with 300s, 200s and 100s kills... that might have happened. Their squadrons should have impressive results

< Message edited by lineartube -- 6/22/2008 1:00:42 PM >

(in reply to Hornblower)
Post #: 5
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 12:35:47 PM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

I don’t even know if the Luftwaffe shot down 65 bombers in on mission..   


Oh yes... they did... 1943... unescorted B-17 raids...


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Hornblower)
Post #: 6
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 1:09:17 PM   
lineartube

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 6/16/2008
From: Portugal
Status: offline
Allied bomber losses in Europe were more impressive. About 20000 lost, if you believe wikipedia.

< Message edited by lineartube -- 6/22/2008 1:12:10 PM >

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 7
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 1:59:27 PM   
Mike Scholl

 

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

I don’t even know if the Luftwaffe shot down 65 bombers in on mission..   


It's especially remarkable considering Tony's were just finishing "Prototype" production in September of 1942, and wouldn't recieve effective cannon armament until late in 1943. And you are right..., several hundred Luftwaffe fighters fighting an hours long engagement over their home country never did better than 60 bombers shot down.

Which pretty much exposes the game's air-to-air system as a total crock, and heavily biased towards JFB's. Yes, the replacements on US 4-engined bombers are WAY too high in 1942.., but you are also getting Tony's into squadron service overseas 8-9 months too early as well. With PDU on, you just make an ahistorically bad situation worse.

(in reply to Hornblower)
Post #: 8
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 2:18:25 PM   
Dive Bomber1

 

Posts: 670
Joined: 10/30/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

I don’t even know if the Luftwaffe shot down 65 bombers in on mission..   


It's especially remarkable considering Tony's were just finishing "Prototype" production in September of 1942, and wouldn't recieve effective cannon armament until late in 1943. And you are right..., several hundred Luftwaffe fighters fighting an hours long engagement over their home country never did better than 60 bombers shot down.

Which pretty much exposes the game's air-to-air system as a total crock, and heavily biased towards JFB's. Yes, the replacements on US 4-engined bombers are WAY too high in 1942.., but you are also getting Tony's into squadron service overseas 8-9 months too early as well. With PDU on, you just make an ahistorically bad situation worse.



The main reason that I have so many Tonys in late September 1942 (and equally importantly, one of the main reasons that I ran out of supplies in May 1942) was that right from the beginning of this game I changed all of my Nate factories to Tony "R&D" and expanded them heavily. (I also expanded my Nakajima engine factories heavily.) Therefore, by using the "R&D" function of the game I was able to have a huge capability in Tonys by August 1942 (although it cost me dearly in lost opportunities in Spring 1942).

So by the "logic" of the Game Design I was simply a Japanese planner with immense "foresight".

In retrospect, I wouldn't do the same thing again in future matches because the cost to my momentum of running out of supplies in Spring 1942 was too much.

But let's not let this discussion drop into the bottemless pit of "Historic vs Fantasy" - I am deliberately trying out the "what if" capability of the Game, as is my opponent.

Thanks -

DB

(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 9
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 3:02:37 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
quote:

Which pretty much exposes the game's air-to-air system as a total crock, and heavily biased towards JFB's.


I think it's fair to say,

Which pretty much exposes the game's air-to-air system as a total crock

But it's just an algorithm that doesn't handle large air-to-air very well.  With the single exception of the bonus-that-shall-not-be-named, there isn't anything that deliberately tilts towards one side or the other.  Each side, depending on the phase-initiative-opportunities of the game, may seem to have an general advantage (such as KB's ability to mass CAP early on, or the same is true for Allies somewhat later). 

Like I said, it's just an algorithm that otherwise doesn't handle massive strikes very well.  But it's not biased per se'.

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to Dive Bomber1)
Post #: 10
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 3:56:09 PM   
jwxspoon


Posts: 167
Joined: 3/21/2006
From: Myrtle Beach, SC USA
Status: offline
Well in my opinion the early appearance of the Tony certainly helps alleviate the emasculation of the Oscar in this game. 

jw

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 11
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 6:43:08 PM   
Shark7


Posts: 7937
Joined: 7/24/2007
From: The Big Nowhere
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

quote:

Which pretty much exposes the game's air-to-air system as a total crock, and heavily biased towards JFB's.


I think it's fair to say,

Which pretty much exposes the game's air-to-air system as a total crock

But it's just an algorithm that doesn't handle large air-to-air very well.  With the single exception of the bonus-that-shall-not-be-named, there isn't anything that deliberately tilts towards one side or the other.  Each side, depending on the phase-initiative-opportunities of the game, may seem to have an general advantage (such as KB's ability to mass CAP early on, or the same is true for Allies somewhat later). 

Like I said, it's just an algorithm that otherwise doesn't handle massive strikes very well.  But it's not biased per se'.


Part of the problem is the how the engine handles the over-sized airstrikes to begin with. The game really treats it as a bunch of little formations instead of one big one. The 4Es travelled in that big formation so they could support each other. However, the game doesn't appear to roll the dice for 100 A6M2 vs 200 B-17 for instance, instead it allows each A6M2 group engage each B-17 group individually, removing the cover fire effect to an extent.

Each individual bomber has blind spots. However, the formation has 360 degree coverage. And this is the part that is probably not modeled well.

I have a feeling that if the USAAF had actually done in real life what the game appears to do (which is use a bunch of little formations) we'd have suffered a lot worse at the hands of Luftwaffe and Japanese fighter pilots.

_____________________________

Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 12
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 6:59:08 PM   
Dive Bomber1

 

Posts: 670
Joined: 10/30/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jwxspoon

Well in my opinion the early appearance of the Tony certainly helps alleviate the emasculation of the Oscar in this game. 

jw



Good point. My current strategy with air units is to sit out all Nates after December 1941, and sit out all Oscars after February 1942. (I'm even experimenting with sitting out most A6M2s after May 1942, and conceding the air to the Allies until August when I get Tojos and Tonys.)

Sure, it reduces my fighter capacity tremendously, but it also prevents the horrific fighter losses that I took early on in this pbem and in my pbem against AuTiger.

DB

(in reply to jwxspoon)
Post #: 13
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 7:04:52 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dive Bomber1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

I don’t even know if the Luftwaffe shot down 65 bombers in on mission..   


It's especially remarkable considering Tony's were just finishing "Prototype" production in September of 1942, and wouldn't recieve effective cannon armament until late in 1943. And you are right..., several hundred Luftwaffe fighters fighting an hours long engagement over their home country never did better than 60 bombers shot down.

Which pretty much exposes the game's air-to-air system as a total crock, and heavily biased towards JFB's. Yes, the replacements on US 4-engined bombers are WAY too high in 1942.., but you are also getting Tony's into squadron service overseas 8-9 months too early as well. With PDU on, you just make an ahistorically bad situation worse.



The main reason that I have so many Tonys in late September 1942 (and equally importantly, one of the main reasons that I ran out of supplies in May 1942) was that right from the beginning of this game I changed all of my Nate factories to Tony "R&D" and expanded them heavily. (I also expanded my Nakajima engine factories heavily.) Therefore, by using the "R&D" function of the game I was able to have a huge capability in Tonys by August 1942 (although it cost me dearly in lost opportunities in Spring 1942).

So by the "logic" of the Game Design I was simply a Japanese planner with immense "foresight".

In retrospect, I wouldn't do the same thing again in future matches because the cost to my momentum of running out of supplies in Spring 1942 was too much.

But let's not let this discussion drop into the bottemless pit of "Historic vs Fantasy" - I am deliberately trying out the "what if" capability of the Game, as is my opponent.

Thanks -

DB



you surely didn´t run out of supplies because you converted aircraft factories in R&D because those don´t use supplies for repairs nor do they use HI for research. Not a design I like...

_____________________________


(in reply to Dive Bomber1)
Post #: 14
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 8:19:21 PM   
Dive Bomber1

 

Posts: 670
Joined: 10/30/2006
Status: offline
quote:

you surely didn´t run out of supplies because you converted aircraft factories in R&D because those don´t use supplies for repairs nor do they use HI for research. Not a design I like...


Huh? Then what do they use?

All I know is that in my recent starts (pbem and AI) where I deliberately:

- did not change Nate factories to Tonys
- did not increase airframe production of fighters (or other aircraft) in general
- did not increase production of Nakajima engines

My supply situation in the Home Islands is a LOT better than it was in earlier games such as the pbems against AuTiger and against my Chinese opponent.

I find it hard to believe that the "repair" and expansion of aircraft and engine factories can be done at no "cost" to the Japanese player in a "Stock" game.

But thanks for the comments anyway.

DB

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 15
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 8:26:28 PM   
Uamaga

 

Posts: 79
Joined: 4/17/2008
From: Kraków, Poland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy
you surely didn´t run out of supplies because you converted aircraft factories in R&D because those don´t use supplies for repairs nor do they use HI for research. Not a design I like...


Factories in R&D DO use supplies on repairs (don't use HI pts for research apparently). I think it is safe to say it is established fact. For details please see this post together with a few above.

What is not proved yet is that R&D factories do not make any research until they fully repaired.
In short things aren't so rosy with japanese R&D ...

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 16
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 10:36:37 PM   
histgamer

 

Posts: 1455
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline
In 43 the germans shot down 60 bombers with fighters and flak and the same mission had another 60 bombers scraped due to damage. So one mission resulted in 120 destroyed air frames. 

(in reply to Uamaga)
Post #: 17
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 11:01:03 PM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl
...heavily biased towards JFB's...


Did the Japanese had to face multiple strikes of 150+ 4E bombers almost every day, who flatten even air big bases in one single attack despite all-out defense efforts - in 1942? I don't think so - but JFB's have to face them! And results like reported above are the exception, not the rule... My opponent sent his B-17s in at 30.000 most of the time, knowing that no early Japanese fighter can intercept at this altitude - and the B-17s still hit from that high up with remarkable accuracy...

< Message edited by LargeSlowTarget -- 6/22/2008 11:07:19 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 18
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/22/2008 11:38:37 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Uamaga


quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy
you surely didn´t run out of supplies because you converted aircraft factories in R&D because those don´t use supplies for repairs nor do they use HI for research. Not a design I like...


Factories in R&D DO use supplies on repairs (don't use HI pts for research apparently). I think it is safe to say it is established fact. For details please see this post together with a few above.

What is not proved yet is that R&D factories do not make any research until they fully repaired.
In short things aren't so rosy with japanese R&D ...




someone just made a test that repair seems not be using supplies, expansion does. And no HI was used for R&D. I always thought only no HI was used but thought repairing R&D factories cost 1000 supplies/factory.


EDIT: rereading the post with the test, R&D repair DOES use 1000 supplies to repair one point. So my thinking over the years was nevertheless right and I was wrong to believe the recent posts until this test...


< Message edited by castor troy -- 6/22/2008 11:49:59 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Uamaga)
Post #: 19
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/23/2008 1:06:12 AM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
quote:

LST - Did the Japanese had to face multiple strikes of 150+ 4E bombers almost every day, who flatten even air big bases in one single attack despite all-out defense efforts - in 1942? I don't think so - but JFB's have to face them!


While I do enjoy each and every one of your posts LST (for purly testosterone related reasons), I'll just point out that -

Actually, the Japanese -did- face strikes by "only" a 10 - 20 B-17s every day, and that -few- number managed to not only close Rabaul, but keep it under thumb afterwards.

Try doing THAT in WitP.



-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 20
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/23/2008 1:17:39 AM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

quote:

LST - Did the Japanese had to face multiple strikes of 150+ 4E bombers almost every day, who flatten even air big bases in one single attack despite all-out defense efforts - in 1942? I don't think so - but JFB's have to face them!


While I do enjoy each and every one of your posts LST (for purly testosterone related reasons), I'll just point out that -

Actually, the Japanese -did- face strikes by "only" a 10 - 20 B-17s every day, and that -few- number managed to not only close Rabaul, but keep it under thumb afterwards.

Try doing THAT in WitP.



-F-


I did not know that. Interesting. Were they flying out of Port Moresby?

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 21
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/23/2008 1:54:46 AM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
I believe there "bouncing thru" Port Moresby.  It's that from bible that many folks like to reference, "Fortress Against the Sun".  I'd quote you chapter and verse, by library book cases have been turn around (to face the wall), because my 2 year-old has some wierd fetish for emptying book-cases; and needless to say, "Daddy's Library" is filled with books that I'd rather not be "read" by a two year old.

-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 22
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/23/2008 3:06:19 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Do any of these "books" feature Miss October?

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 23
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/23/2008 4:15:10 AM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

I believe there "bouncing thru" Port Moresby.  It's that from bible that many folks like to reference, "Fortress Against the Sun".  I'd quote you chapter and verse, by library book cases have been turn around (to face the wall), because my 2 year-old has some wierd fetish for emptying book-cases; and needless to say, "Daddy's Library" is filled with books that I'd rather not be "read" by a two year old.

-F-


I understand that sentiment

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 24
RE: A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction - 6/23/2008 11:36:48 AM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

quote:

LST - Did the Japanese had to face multiple strikes of 150+ 4E bombers almost every day, who flatten even air big bases in one single attack despite all-out defense efforts - in 1942? I don't think so - but JFB's have to face them!


While I do enjoy each and every one of your posts LST (for purly testosterone related reasons), I'll just point out that -

Actually, the Japanese -did- face strikes by "only" a 10 - 20 B-17s every day, and that -few- number managed to not only close Rabaul, but keep it under thumb afterwards.

Try doing THAT in WitP.



-F-


Sorry for the 'angry' tone in my last post, but I had just received a turn and I had to witness a 160+ B-24 raid on Bangkok which decimated 8 groups of Tonies (exp 60 -70) from full strength to an average of 8 planes per group and destroyed a level 7 airbase - in a single attack...

I do not concurr with the 'only 10 - 20 B-17s a day to close Rabaul' statement. It took a much higher number of heavy bomber attacks plus medium and light plus fighter sweeps to neutralize Rabaul, and this was achieved only in early 44.

See http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-P-Rabaul/index.html:

"Reducing Rabaul and Kavieng

All during the invasions of Arawe, Cape Gloucester, and Saidor, and during the discussions over the Bismarck Archipelago operations, the Solomons air command had been putting forth a maximum effort to reduce Rabaul. Completion of the Torokina fighter strip at Empress Augusta Bay, Bougainville, was a major step forward, for now New Georgia- and Guadalcanal-based bombers could have fighter escort in their attacks. But by the end of 1943 it was clear that high-level bombing would not suffice to neutralize Rabaul. Obviously, success depended on completion of the bomber strips by the Piva River (Piva Uncle and Piva Yoke).15

Piva Uncle, eight thousand feet by three hundred feet, was ready as a staging field on 30 December 1943. On 5 January 1944 SBD's and TBF's from Munda staged through to attack Rabaul, but by noon, when the bombers arrived over the target, Rabaul was as usual blanketed by heavy clouds. A similar attack two days later met the same difficulties, but on 9 January Piva Yoke was ready and from then on bombers could be permanently based at the Bougainville fields and could reach Rabaul in the morning, before it was covered by clouds.

Thereafter during January TBF's, SBD's, B-25's, and B-24's struck regularly at Rabaul. The Japanese lost many planes but occasionally received reinforcements from Truk, and continued to resist with fighter interception and antiaircraft fire. ". . . the skies overhead were the scene of continuous annihilation battles. . . ."

By the end of January heavy bombers had flown 263 sorties over Rabaul; B-25's, 180 sorties; SBD's, 368; TBF's, 227; fighters, 1,850. Losses totaled 8 B-24's, 14 B-25's, 8 SBD's, 5 TBF's, 19 P-38's, 37 F4U's, 5 F6F's, and 6 New Zealand P-40's.

Damage to Japanese equipment and weapons on the ground was relatively light, for in late November the enemy had begun the prodigious task of digging every possible item underground in Rabaul's volcanic rock, a task that was well along by January. But all buildings were knocked flat. Ships and grounded planes were especially vulnerable to low-level bombing and dive-bombing. By February 1944 the Allies had won a signal victory; Japanese surface ships stopped using the harbor."


_____________________________


(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 25
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> A Japanese Fanboy's small moment of satisfaction Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.000