Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Single-player board games?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Single-player board games? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:01:01 PM   
Ramcat

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Prince George, British Columbia
Status: offline 		I'm looking for some single-player wargames. Nothing specifically, I'm just looking for some general recommendations, thanks in advance.
Post #: 1
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:48:50 PM   
jimi3


Posts: 151
Joined: 7/4/2006
From: Michigan
Status: offline 		In the late 80s Victory Games released Ambush! with additional modules Move Out!, Purple Heart and Silver Star. These are based in Europe 1944-45. They also released Battle Hym with additional module Leatherneck based in the Pacific. Fantastic one player games that can be found on Ebay with some additional player made mods available. Unfortunatly, sometimes at a pretty high price. I think worth it. Then I got a computer........
Jim

(in reply to Ramcat)
Post #: 2
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:49:04 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		Simple way to get you some samples is to provide a few links.

Here is one for the classic squad level game Ambush:

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/265524

(in reply to Ramcat)
Post #: 3
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:50:32 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		Here is a link to my all time favorite solitaire board game Raid on St. Nazaire:

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/1425

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 4
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:52:12 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		Patton's Best:

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/4556

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 5
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:53:12 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		B-29:

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/28907

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 6
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:54:41 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		B-17:

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/1032

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 7
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:55:24 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		Open Fire:

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/1672

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 8
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:56:19 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		East Front Solitaire:

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/8756

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 9
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 4:57:27 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		I could go on posting links all day, but it might be easier for you to go to Board Game Geeks and do some searching and perusing.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 10
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 9:17:44 PM   
Yogi the Great


Posts: 1948
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline 		Actually, I found that most of the classic Avalon Hill board games played quite well solitare.  Over a period of about 10-12 years I purchased most of their releases and mostly just played single-player.  While it was hard to make grand plans far into the future or of course to surprise the enemy regularly, after each player turn (like chess) you look over the situation, see the opportunity and take it.  Most games played out reasonably well.  You in effect take advantage of your own mistakes.

One of the reasons many of us switched to computer games was to have an AI to fight instead of ourselves.  AI works fine to a point, but in general often those solitare games provided a better challenge then the poor AI so many companies put into their games.  I think a number of computer game players still occasionally play "hot seat" games aganst themselves instead of the AI for this reason.  Complaining about computer AI is one of our favorite things to do.

I did have the Ambush game mentioned above.  It wasn't bad and was worth having a bit of fun with, but for me it just couldn't take the place of the wargame classics.

_____________________________

Hooked Since AH Gettysburg

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 11
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 9:23:43 PM   
andym


Posts: 1117
Joined: 7/12/2006
From: Kings Lynn UK
Status: offline 		Ahh yogi,the AH Gettysburg was a classic!I still have my copy in the loft.

_____________________________

Press to Test...............Release to Detonate!

(in reply to Yogi the Great)
Post #: 12
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/3/2008 10:05:57 PM   
noxious


Posts: 177
Joined: 6/13/2008
From: Montreal, Qc, Canuckistan
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yogi the Great

... While it was hard to make grand plans far into the future or of course to surprise the enemy regularly, after each player turn (like chess) you look over the situation, see the opportunity and take it. Most games played out reasonably well. You in effect take advantage of your own mistakes.

One of the reasons many of us switched to computer games was to have an AI to fight instead of ourselves. AI works fine to a point, but in general often those solitare games provided a better challenge then the poor AI so many companies put into their games. I think a number of computer game players still occasionally play "hot seat" games aganst themselves instead of the AI for this reason. Complaining about computer AI is one of our favorite things to do.




Bingo. On the Money, Bullseye !!!

Most games of board Third Reich I played were solitaire, ditto with Second Front.
I also enjoyed a lot of Tac Air, Firepower and Flight Leader in solo play.
It's more conducive to what defines most grognards approach to gaming (I think) : being able to try all sorts of "what if" scenarios, and solo play on boardgames helped to do this as you didn't have to argue with your opponent, or at least, not in the same way as when you argue with yourself ;)
And the switch to computer wargaming...
Nice post, thank you




_____________________________

Be Kind. Everyone is fighting a hard battle.

(in reply to Yogi the Great)
Post #: 13
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/4/2008 1:41:30 PM   
105mm Howitzer


Posts: 447
Joined: 8/9/2007
From: Montreal, Quebec
Status: offline 		Second Yogi's suggestion. I personally cherish the old Squad Leader game ( and following gamettes)
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yogi the Great

Actually, I found that most of the classic Avalon Hill board games played quite well solitare.  Over a period of about 10-12 years I purchased most of their releases and mostly just played single-player.  While it was hard to make grand plans far into the future or of course to surprise the enemy regularly, after each player turn (like chess) you look over the situation, see the opportunity and take it.  Most games played out reasonably well.  You in effect take advantage of your own mistakes.

One of the reasons many of us switched to computer games was to have an AI to fight instead of ourselves.  AI works fine to a point, but in general often those solitare games provided a better challenge then the poor AI so many companies put into their games.  I think a number of computer game players still occasionally play "hot seat" games aganst themselves instead of the AI for this reason.  Complaining about computer AI is one of our favorite things to do.

I did have the Ambush game mentioned above.  It wasn't bad and was worth having a bit of fun with, but for me it just couldn't take the place of the wargame classics.



_____________________________

"Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" - Publius Renatus, 390 A.D.

(in reply to Yogi the Great)
Post #: 14
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/4/2008 2:37:52 PM   
Grell

 

Posts: 1064
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: Canada
Status: offline 		I love playing Clash of Arms games solitaire. The "La Bataille" series is amazing.

Regards,

Greg

_____________________________


(in reply to 105mm Howitzer)
Post #: 15
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/4/2008 5:00:47 PM   
petdoc

 

Posts: 111
Joined: 5/24/2002
From: Calgary, Canada
Status: offline 		Dan Verrsen(?) Games - the Hornet Leader PC guy - just recently released a solo board game concerning Rommel (3 battles included I believe) that I just ordered. It is getting very good press at BGG (boardgame geek). They will also be releasing a game based on Alexander as well - that one has me stoked -

(in reply to Grell)
Post #: 16
RE: Single-player board games? - 7/5/2008 9:44:51 PM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline 		My favorite was StarFleet Battles! Woot! 

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to petdoc)
Post #: 17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Single-player board games? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.094