AW1Steve
Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007 From: Mordor Illlinois Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dixie quote:
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve True, but the RN's not building many battleships these days , and previously those names did belong to ships of the line. I also wonder how the EU feels about it's member states having ship types with agressive sounding names like "destroyers"? I wonder if the European navies will re-classify such ships as "Large Frigates" or "Large Escorts" . Sort of like "Through-decked cruisers". **** 'em I've heard all sorts of rumours about these carriers, mostly so bloody stupid they're unbelievable. We'll be sharing the actual carriers with the Froggies for example  How does that work? They run the mess decks while we run the fighting bits?  There'll be JSF when QE enters service though, it'll be the carbon fibre death providers for a while. Hopefully I'll dodge that, Floggin the Oggin is not for me As an aside, has anyone else noticed how ugly ships are getting these days? Yeah , but from a radar-cross-section point of view, they are beautiful. Maybe I have no poetry in my soul, but I'd rather sail in a less attractive , but stealthy ship than a beautiful ships that's also a missile magnet! I'd love to the the Sea-wraithe proto-type put into service. carbon fibre death providers??? And I must say , that having the French run the mess decks isn't a bad idea. As long the Brit's run the ships pub! I thought that the French were going to simply buy a sistership instead of riding on yours?
_____________________________
|