Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: THE THREAD!!!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> RE: THE THREAD!!! Page: <<   < prev  115 116 [117] 118 119   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 7:54:04 PM   
VSWG


Posts: 3432
Joined: 5/31/2006
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Yeah, Bobo.  Now you guys got me interested in Jutland.  I guess I can fire up WPO if no turn is in my inbox tonight.

Good luck finding Jutland in the Pacific.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3481
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 7:54:56 PM   
VSWG


Posts: 3432
Joined: 5/31/2006
From: Germany
Status: offline
Oooh, new page! This deserves a...

Tithe!


_____________________________


(in reply to VSWG)
Post #: 3482
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 7:56:30 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk

It's been a while since I read Mahan but I think he gave due weight to the effects geography had on the fleets-in-being concept. In other words, it would work better for France than it would for Germany. France doesn't have its bottle corked by GB, Germany does.

Yeah, and that’s what has me scratching my head over the ‘fleet in being’ thing. To work, the ‘fleet in being’ has to ‘be’ somewhere. Fleets have to ‘do’ something or represent a credible threat to some national interest. They can’t just exist; fact without function does not write large in the pages of glory.

Been following Nik’s Austrian thoughts; very interesting. Don’t think I’ve seen anyone really applying this stuff to the Adriatic before. Woof!

(in reply to anarchyintheuk)
Post #: 3483
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 7:56:39 PM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

bombardments don't do much in the end but annoy. Its always easier of course to employ the smaller more expendible units in limited ops but they also end up doing little most of the time. They should have sought an engagement of some kind but of course that great bugaboo of BB's got in the way.....Capital ships built to win battles and turn tides of war, but in the end too valuable to risk. Had Souchon linked up, that might have opened some poss', but he had little faith that the AH navy would do anything of worth (and he was right). Another option would be to try to link up with the Turks in the Dardenelles but that was politically unfeasible....that would have left the AH coastline "open" though i'm not sure what the Italians would have done, they had their hands full as it was and amphibious ops were still in their infancy.

1914 med
2 austrian dreadnoughts completed with another training up(was completed but i do not believe the crew was trained up enough for it to see battle in the opening month).
3 semi dreadnoughts(still useful ships at this stage)
6 pre dreadnought(useless by this point)
3 armored cruisers( again usless)
4 light cruisers
25 destoryers.
german med navy
1BC
1LC
british
3 bc
4 protected cruisers(newer ships but would have been outclassed by the dreadnoughts and semi dreds)
french navy
4 Dreadnoughts
6 semi dreadnoughts
15 pre dreadnoughts.
22 armored cruisers
83 destoryers

pulling this data from www.naval-history.net

but from the reading i've done the french only had one or dreads in the med. if the austrians would of attacked the british as they chased the german bcs or if the austirans and germans had gone after the french in the early in the war they would of actualy had a chance of causing serious damage to the french and british in the med. that was the part i never understood if the central powers had forced the british to expend some of their naval might to worry about the austrians in the opening months of the war the could have actually made it to where the germans would of had a chance in the north sea to actualy do something.

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 3484
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:00:52 PM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE


quote:

ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk

It's been a while since I read Mahan but I think he gave due weight to the effects geography had on the fleets-in-being concept. In other words, it would work better for France than it would for Germany. France doesn't have its bottle corked by GB, Germany does.

Yeah, and that’s what has me scratching my head over the ‘fleet in being’ thing. To work, the ‘fleet in being’ has to ‘be’ somewhere. Fleets have to ‘do’ something or represent a credible threat to some national interest. They can’t just exist; fact without function does not write large in the pages of glory.

Been following Nik’s Austrian thoughts; very interesting. Don’t think I’ve seen anyone really applying this stuff to the Adriatic before. Woof!


i found the war in the med and adriatic to be far more interesting than the war in the north sea.


_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 3485
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:09:30 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bobogoboom


but from the reading i've done the french only had one or dreads in the med. if the austrians would of attacked the british as they chased the german bcs or if the austirans and germans had gone after the french in the early in the war they would of actualy had a chance of causing serious damage to the french and british in the med. that was the part i never understood if the central powers had forced the british to expend some of their naval might to worry about the austrians in the opening months of the war the could have actually made it to where the germans would of had a chance in the north sea to actualy do something.


The French were terrified at the prospect of the Goeben getting admidst their all important convoys ferrying troops from NA to France and employed their major assets in fear of such. (While the UK BC squadron attempted to shadow and bottle her up) The Problem the Austrians had with such an idea was the same however....even though at the time Italy was still neutral or on the cusp of declaring neutrality, they still always kept one eye on them since they were a traditional enemy. As such ideas that would take the AH fleet, esp the heavies out of the Adriatic were akin to cutting wrists. It would both leave their coastline "open" + they might lose their precious heavies which would be a political disaster. In the end though, he who risks nothing gains nothing.

The Italians had a similar fear to be fair, only their fear was focused on the French and British bombarding their long exposed coastline. In the end though, even had Italy sided with the CP's, I doubt there would have been much bombarding. As I mentioned, it makes for great press but usually achieves little.

The Germans came up with some clever if straightforward schemes to take on a managable portion of the Grand Fleet....only problem was that the UK was reading their mail but such an occurance almost happened early on prior to Jutland (not Dogger Bank)



_____________________________


(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 3486
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:10:53 PM   
thegreatwent


Posts: 3011
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
quote:

i found the war in the med and adriatic to be far more interesting than the war in the north sea.


That would probably be because things happened. My votes go to the Baltic or Med for WWI naval action. Although I must admit that Coronel and the Falklands were decisive. Even if they were one sided.

_____________________________


(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 3487
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:11:54 PM   
niceguy2005


Posts: 12523
Joined: 7/4/2005
From: Super secret hidden base
Status: offline
Just passing through tithe.

_____________________________


Artwork graciously provided by Dixie

(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3488
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:17:43 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thegreatwent

quote:

i found the war in the med and adriatic to be far more interesting than the war in the north sea.


That would probably be because things happened. My votes go to the Baltic or Med for WWI naval action. Although I must admit that Coronel and the Falklands were decisive. Even if they were one sided.


and Fauklands was a great example of a Navy willing to take a chance in order to beat down a threat. There was not a little bit of hemhawing at the thought of dispersing the BC fleet when most eyes were focused on the North Sea and counting noses but those who risk nothing....win nothing in the end.

_____________________________


(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3489
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:20:57 PM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus


quote:

ORIGINAL: bobogoboom


but from the reading i've done the french only had one or dreads in the med. if the austrians would of attacked the british as they chased the german bcs or if the austirans and germans had gone after the french in the early in the war they would of actualy had a chance of causing serious damage to the french and british in the med. that was the part i never understood if the central powers had forced the british to expend some of their naval might to worry about the austrians in the opening months of the war the could have actually made it to where the germans would of had a chance in the north sea to actualy do something.


The French were terrified at the prospect of the Goeben getting admidst their all important convoys ferrying troops from NA to France and employed their major assets in fear of such. (While the UK BC squadron attempted to shadow and bottle her up) The Problem the Austrians had with such an idea was the same however....even though at the time Italy was still neutral or on the cusp of declaring neutrality, they still always kept one eye on them since they were a traditional enemy. As such ideas that would take the AH fleet, esp the heavies out of the Adriatic were akin to cutting wrists. It would both leave their coastline "open" + they might lose their precious heavies which would be a political disaster. In the end though, he who risks nothing gains nothing.

The Italians had a similar fear to be fair, only their fear was focused on the French and British bombarding their long exposed coastline. In the end though, even had Italy sided with the CP's, I doubt there would have been much bombarding. As I mentioned, it makes for great press but usually achieves little.

The Germans came up with some clever if straightforward schemes to take on a managable portion of the Grand Fleet....only problem was that the UK was reading their mail but such an occurance almost happened early on prior to Jutland (not Dogger Bank)



yes but to me this was the only way the cp could have won the war at see cause the brit and french enought of a scare in the med to force the brits to send a sizeable fleet to the med. thus evening out the north sea so the germans had a chance against the grand fleet. once this opertunity was lost the war at sea for them was doomed.

even though in their defence the cp didn't have to win the war at sea to win the war.

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 3490
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:28:18 PM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline
the austrians almost knocked the italians out of the war once with offensive and were only saved by a russian offensive that they threw together and the austrians and germans almost knocked the italians out a second time in 1917 or 18. and the germans did eventualy knock the russians out. after the initial offensive the germans and austrians should have focused on knocking the lesser allies out of the war. but land combat is a whole nother day.

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 3491
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:31:28 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
True. I also think they could have done some damage to the Dardenelles operation. Even once the Italians joined the war, a sharp clash might have gained them at least a moral victory (admitedly in that case the land war dominated) Generally speaking as time went by, chances become more and more remote till it was too late....such as with the HSF after the US joined the war and sent over an entire battlesquadron to backup the Grand Fleet. Eventually the disperity in #'s was such that the British could contemplate sending some of their older Dreadnoughts to the Med to bolster the Italo-French fleet butressing the Orlando barrage.

_____________________________


(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 3492
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:32:03 PM   
thegreatwent


Posts: 3011
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
quote:

and Fauklands was a great example of a Navy willing to take a chance in order to beat down a threat. There was not a little bit of hemhawing at the thought of dispersing the BC fleet when most eyes were focused on the North Sea and counting noses but those who risk nothing....win nothing in the end.


I agree, Jellicoe must be the most weak kneed Admiral in recent memory. His fears created menaces everywhere and cost English sailors their lives at Coronel and the Dardanelles. By not wanting any modern ships dispatched from his fleet he essentially "risked nothing".

P.S. I sympathize with your loss and can add no comfort other than to urge you to remember the good times.

_____________________________


(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 3493
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:34:48 PM   
thegreatwent


Posts: 3011
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
Wow, a barrage of posts. Bobo has touched a nerve.

_____________________________


(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3494
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:37:34 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
IIRC, Fischer wasn't too happy about it either, nor Beatty. I wouldn't consider Jellicoe "weak-kneed". He simply wasn't all fire and guts like the flashy and aggressive Beatty (aggressive to the point of recklessness i might add) He understood the strengths and weaknesses of the two major antagonists all too well and also was well aware that numbers were very important. One must remember that in the early days the GF edge in numbers was at it's lowest, exaserbated by the loss of Audacious to a mine. Jellicoe's lack of "flashiness" and refusal to sensationalize his viewpoint in postwar memiors tends to garner him alot of sh*t. He didn't care.....He was as Churchill said, the only man in Britian who could lose the war in a single day. An exageration of course, but a major sea defeat for Britian would have caused major problems. It was a burden not many could have borne. I akin Jellicoe as a WWI version of Spruance....conservative and careful with his eye on the big picture. Beatty, i akin to Halsey...fire and guts and determined to win a big battle. Both ended up losing lives in the process.

_____________________________


(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3495
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:45:04 PM   
anarchyintheuk

 

Posts: 3921
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Dallas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

The Germans came up with some clever if straightforward schemes to take on a managable portion of the Grand Fleet....only problem was that the UK was reading their mail but such an occurance almost happened early on prior to Jutland (not Dogger Bank)



The fact that the Grand Fleet had to sail farther than the Germans to meet at Jutland should have at least made someone in the High Seas Fleet go 'Hmmm....'. I don't remember them taking any action or suspecting that their code had been broken.

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 3496
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:46:22 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
well these are the same guys who insisted that Enigma was safe......SAFE i tell you.

IIRC, they did attempt to place a Uboat picket near Scapa to warn and attack the GF should it emerge.

_____________________________


(in reply to anarchyintheuk)
Post #: 3497
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:48:33 PM   
thegreatwent


Posts: 3011
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
I acknowledge your points. But Jellicoe's fears of losing the war caused him to fixate on concerns about phantom minefields and submarine ambushes. Hindsight is 20/20 so it easy to give him sh*t, yet I can't help feel that a little more aggressiveness would have paid huge dividends.

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 3498
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:50:59 PM   
anarchyintheuk

 

Posts: 3921
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Dallas
Status: offline
What Nik said. Jellicoe had no reason to risk anything. After their second battle turn the Germans were running home, where they would be stuck at Wilhelmshaven in very much the same circumstance as before (except for goading the Grand Fleet to be more safety conscious and making Beatty's force actually practice gunnery once in a while).

IMO I thought Jellicoe was actually too aggressive in going after the HSF at night. All in all, he was poorly served by Beatty and Room 40 during the battle and the night pursuit that followed.

< Message edited by anarchyintheuk -- 7/24/2008 8:51:52 PM >

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 3499
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 8:57:41 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
And the Italians unleashed 12 offensives of the Isonzo. A messy bloody affair it was. The AH army did better here mostly on defense. Their offensives against Serbia and Russia under Conrad were disasterous and the Germans quickly realized they would have to prop their "Ally" up to keep them in the war.

< Message edited by Nikademus -- 7/24/2008 8:58:43 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 3500
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:04:27 PM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thegreatwent

quote:

and Fauklands was a great example of a Navy willing to take a chance in order to beat down a threat. There was not a little bit of hemhawing at the thought of dispersing the BC fleet when most eyes were focused on the North Sea and counting noses but those who risk nothing....win nothing in the end.


I agree, Jellicoe must be the most weak kneed Admiral in recent memory. His fears created menaces everywhere and cost English sailors their lives at Coronel and the Dardanelles. By not wanting any modern ships dispatched from his fleet he essentially "risked nothing".

P.S. I sympathize with your loss and can add no comfort other than to urge you to remember the good times.

yeah but the alternative was beatty who would have gotten his whole fleet sunk out from under him becuase he didn't understand the limits of his ships and the strength of the germans. I feel jellicoe is crucified for being overly caucious when all his job was was to bottle the germans up and not let them get an advantage in sea powere which he did very effectivly. the dardanells campain would not have been won with more battleships they would have just gotten themselves sunk. it needed more lagistics and a hell of a lot more men. it was a badly convieved and even worsly executed affair that should be completely blamed on churchill and his complete lack of respect for the turks and their soldiers

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3501
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:15:04 PM   
thegreatwent


Posts: 3011
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
quote:

yeah but the alternative was beatty who would have gotten his whole fleet sunk out from under him becuase he didn't understand the limits of his ships and the strength of the germans. I feel jellicoe is crucified for being overly caucious when all his job was was to bottle the germans up and not let them get an advantage in sea powere which he did very effectivly. the dardanells campain would not have been won with more battleships they would have just gotten themselves sunk. it needed more lagistics and a hell of a lot more men. it was a badly convieved and even worsly executed affair that should be completely blamed on churchill and his complete lack of respect for the turks and their soldier


Yikes I recognize that I am now outnumbered 3 to 1. Therefore I will not carry the day. Perhaps I am gullible and just reflect the criticism of Jellicoe, but I do believe his leadership lacked spirit. Imagine if at Coronel even a single Dreadnought had been present? Under that ships umbrella von Speer would have had to either run or engage. An engagement would have been to the Germans disadvantage. To flee would have strained his fleets ability to remain a viable threat do to fuel limits.

Still I confess Jellicoe's job is not one that I would have wanted .

_____________________________


(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 3502
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:15:34 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thegreatwent

P.S. I sympathize with your loss and can add no comfort other than to urge you to remember the good times.


Thx....and to everyone for the kind thoughts. Its been a lousy day having to sit here at work and try not to think about it. This has been helpful.



_____________________________


(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3503
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:24:30 PM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

well these are the same guys who insisted that Enigma was safe......SAFE i tell you.

IIRC, they did attempt to place a Uboat picket near Scapa to warn and attack the GF should it emerge.

the germans really lost 2 wars in large part because of there trust in the fact that no one could break their code.

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 3504
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:29:06 PM   
pasternakski


Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002
Status: offline
quote:

Yikes I recognize that I am now outnumbered 3 to 1.


But you have the strength of 10, for your heart is pure.

I agree that Jellicoe might have done better, but can you imagine just maneuvering a fleet that size? Just getting a bunch of ships into a position where they could fire at all was probably far more than I could handle. I remember playing the old AH game the first few times and trying to get the Grand Fleet sorted out and deployed in something resembling a line of battle was terrifically frustrating. Of course, I was a 13-year-old moron then, too (at least I'm not 13 anymore).

Still, a lot of the criticism of Jellicoe stems from the frustration the British felt over their trump card, the Royal Navy, being bested tactically by the hated Hun. Coupled with the stark reality of immense losses and stalemate in France, and somebody had to be the whipping boy.

_____________________________

Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.

(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3505
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:32:24 PM   
anarchyintheuk

 

Posts: 3921
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Dallas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thegreatwent

Imagine if at Coronel even a single Dreadnought had been present? Under that ships umbrella von Speer would have had to either run or engage. An engagement would have been to the Germans disadvantage. To flee would have strained his fleets ability to remain a viable threat do to fuel limits.

Still I confess Jellicoe's job is not one that I would have wanted .


That was the theory behind Churchill dispatching the Canopus (an old predreadnaught w/ 12' guns. There's conflicting testimony as to the ship's top speed. Its own engineer said 12 knots, supposedly it ran faster after his departure. Craddock decided not to wait for the Canopus because of its lack of speed. From what i remember, the cables from Churchill to Craddock were ambiguous as to whether he was supposed to wait for Canopus or aggressively seek out Scheer.

The Canopus was actually at the Falklands w/ the BCs when Scheer came calling.

(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3506
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:33:56 PM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

And the Italians unleashed 12 offensives of the Isonzo. A messy bloody affair it was. The AH army did better here mostly on defense. Their offensives against Serbia and Russia under Conrad were disasterous and the Germans quickly realized they would have to prop their "Ally" up to keep them in the war.

yeah the austrians made a mess of serbia and russian but i think if the germans had helped the austrians defeat the serbs in 1915 and then both the austrians and germans had concentraited on the russian it could of been a very diff outcome to the war.

the offensive by the austrians agains the italians did almost knock them out of the war if not for the brilliant offensive by the russians in the south. if the germans had been smart they would have sent reinforcments to the austrian russian line and let the austrians finish their offensive off against the italians the austrians came close to cutting of the entire easter italian army.

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 3507
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:36:29 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thegreatwent

Yikes I recognize that I am now outnumbered 3 to 1. Therefore I will not carry the day. Perhaps I am gullible and just reflect the criticism of Jellicoe, but I do believe his leadership lacked spirit. Imagine if at Coronel even a single Dreadnought had been present? Under that ships umbrella von Speer would have had to either run or engage. An engagement would have been to the Germans disadvantage. To flee would have strained his fleets ability to remain a viable threat do to fuel limits.

Still I confess Jellicoe's job is not one that I would have wanted .


If you havn't yet picked it up, i'd highly recommend Masse's "Castles of Steel" In addition to analysis of Jellicoe and his leadership, it also covers the other major players and how naval strategy developed and played out during the war.

Coronel - Hmm, well sending a single and highly valuable Dreadnought battleship would probably have been seen as the height of folly by all the Sea Lords not to mention the other powers. All it really would have done is burn a hell of alot of coal and acomplished little due to it's slow speed. As it was, Craddock did have a "battleship" available to bolster him, the old Canopus but he left the ship behind....IIRC, due to an erronious report by the ship's engineer who lost his nerve that the ship's engines were out of commission. Had he kept Canopus with him, Spee might have taken discretion as the better part of valor.

The sending of a couple battlecruisers though....that was the best decision.....it was the job they were designed to do originally.....outgun and outpace any weaker cruiser vs. the later catch-22 of having to square off against like ships.


_____________________________


(in reply to thegreatwent)
Post #: 3508
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:37:22 PM   
bobogoboom


Posts: 3799
Joined: 2/13/2006
From: Dallas
Status: offline
well this has been fun

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.

Sig art by rogueusmc

(in reply to bobogoboom)
Post #: 3509
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 7/24/2008 9:39:11 PM   
anarchyintheuk

 

Posts: 3921
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Dallas
Status: offline
I remember playing Jutland as a 12 or 13 year old moron as well. It was hard to develop a realistic command and control system, especially considering how fubared the Grand Fleets communications were that day. My neighbor and I came up w/ 1d6 for Beatty actually listening to you. If you didn't make the roll you had another 1d6 for which direction and how far Beatty went off the course commanded. I don't think we ever finished it.

(in reply to pasternakski)
Post #: 3510
Page:   <<   < prev  115 116 [117] 118 119   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> RE: THE THREAD!!! Page: <<   < prev  115 116 [117] 118 119   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.859