Erik Rutins
Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000 From: Vermont, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Doc o War Why does cutting off the Mississippi cut this trade value? Surely even with the Union Parked in New Orleaqns and the Mouth of the River blocked- - trade goods came up out of Mexico and entered the confederacy. This was especially true of the French Military aide. France was busy all during the period 1858 to 1866 in Trying to conquer Mexico. We were too busy fighting the War in our own land to enforce the Monroe Doctorine- though we did after the war, finally forcing the French out. The French had a real political, economic and strategic reason for supporting the Confed war effort- especially at first. That trade came up out of Texas. Blocking the Mississippi does not block trade coming into Texas. To do that, you have to take Galveston. Trade coming into Texas can certainly move up into other parts of the CSA as well. quote:
I think you should consider- you gods on high who deside all that is realin the WBTS universe, consider some modified Western Trade even if the Mississippi is blockaded. This would end if the Union Took out the two regions in Texas- Dallas and Corpus Christi. Or had complete control of the entire Mississippi River- ala Historical.. I think the existing economic stats of Texas represent some of this trade and resources. However, the idea about making the Mississippi a bit "leaky" in general is a good one, though any change there would require new balance testing to make sure the CSA would not end up with ahistorically high levels of supply. The current game balance, given a roughly historical progression, models things pretty well as far as later CSA supply difficulties. Regards, - Erik
_____________________________
|