Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Carriers and fuel

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Carriers and fuel Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Carriers and fuel - 9/4/2008 8:02:59 PM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline
Hyperthetical question, but I was hoping it had occured in my PBEM game.

If a carrier runs out of fuel can it still launch aircraft. Should be no, but I bet it isn't.
Post #: 1
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/4/2008 8:04:10 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Why shouldn't that be possible? WWII escort carriers could launch aircraft whilst at anchor.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Chris21wen)
Post #: 2
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/4/2008 8:25:03 PM   
Shark7


Posts: 7937
Joined: 7/24/2007
From: The Big Nowhere
Status: offline
They should be able to, though I would guess that the plane loads would have to be adjusted as they will not be getting the 30 kts head wind usually provided by the moving carrier. That 30kts does make a big difference on how much take-off weight can be.

_____________________________

Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 3
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/4/2008 8:30:42 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
This is true, but survival-launching aircraft would definitely be possible.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Shark7)
Post #: 4
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/4/2008 9:30:28 PM   
BPRE

 

Posts: 624
Joined: 10/16/2000
From: Stockholm,Sweden
Status: offline
Hi,

I've seen the AI run out of fuel on it's carriers and when receiving inbound strikes not a single fighter took off.

I guess it's rather unusual for people to end up in such a situation (at least in the places the AI tend to do it ) so it's probably not noticed.

/BPRE

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 5
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/4/2008 10:47:10 PM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline
Turning into the wind and 30kts across the deck were deem essential for any a/c with a decent load.  Good pilots might make it off and landing would be even more hazardous.

(in reply to BPRE)
Post #: 6
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/4/2008 11:09:15 PM   
tocaff


Posts: 4781
Joined: 10/12/2006
From: USA now in Brasil
Status: offline
A hazardous carrier landing!  Now that's funny as everyone knows that they're all semi controlled crashes.

_____________________________

Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768

(in reply to Chris21wen)
Post #: 7
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/5/2008 2:44:04 AM   
bigjoe96912

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
Catapults catapults catapults, they all had them and yes they could launch an aircraft with a decent load at a full stop, been there done that (Americans had them anywho)

(in reply to tocaff)
Post #: 8
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/5/2008 3:19:50 AM   
Shark7


Posts: 7937
Joined: 7/24/2007
From: The Big Nowhere
Status: offline
True they had catapults, but the catapults were designed to launch the A/C at a certain weight with a certain airspeed over the deck. Even with the catapults, losing 30kts of headwind speed would require an adjustment of the a/c take-off load to reduce weight. Basically, the easiest way to reduce take-off weight is to 1) reduce ordnance or 2) reduce fuel. So you have a choice of less weapons or less range, or both.

_____________________________

Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'

(in reply to bigjoe96912)
Post #: 9
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/5/2008 8:50:06 AM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Why shouldn't that be possible? WWII escort carriers could launch aircraft whilst at anchor.


They had a catapult and they used it. Couldn't launch a deckload strike that way, though.

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 10
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/5/2008 11:19:12 PM   
bigjoe96912

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
Ok if you are out of gas why are you worried about launching a strike!!!! Duh let them Hellcats fly!!!!!!!

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 11
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/6/2008 7:24:48 AM   
Jorm


Posts: 545
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Melbourne
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigjoe96912

Ok if you are out of gas why are you worried about launching a strike!!!! Duh let them Hellcats fly!!!!!!!


I think the OP was concerned as often carriers had to activly steam into the wind to launch a strike.
so erm, DUH!!! to you

(in reply to bigjoe96912)
Post #: 12
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/6/2008 4:11:35 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
Don’t think it’s necessary to achieve 30 knots for operations. Your average Bogue CVE was built on a C3-S-A1 freighter hull and had a top speed of 16.5 knots. Your average Sangamon CVE was built on a T3 tanker hull and had a top speed of 18 knots.

(in reply to Jorm)
Post #: 13
RE: Carriers and fuel - 9/6/2008 4:31:48 PM   
treespider


Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigjoe96912

Catapults catapults catapults, they all had them and yes they could launch an aircraft with a decent load at a full stop, been there done that (Americans had them anywho)



So what's generating the steam for the catapults?

_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to bigjoe96912)
Post #: 14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Carriers and fuel Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.797