Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby...

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> John Tiller's Battleground Series >> After Action Reports >> Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby... Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby... - 9/21/2008 2:00:46 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
This is the beginning of a new battle between Nemo (Fionn) and myself. After much discussion we are playing out Scenario 10b of the Chicamauga Battle! It will be bloody and close quarters.

I'll pull up the map in the next post. The battle covers FAR more territory then Gettysburg so it will be interesting.

Nemo and I are following the two new House Rules we agreed upon in the Forum:
1. Melee will be determined by the quality of a unit plus the influence of its leader.
2. Movement will be halved to slow down the action.

Thoughts????


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/
Post #: 1
RE: Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby... - 9/21/2008 4:31:09 AM   
nealjhebert

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 9/6/2008
Status: offline
Good luck! I've glanced at the disposition of forces and terrain and will be interested to see what strategies the two of you employ.

My initial thoughts on cutting movement points in half is that movement will slow to a crawl because of the terrain involved. Was this accomplished by editing the PDT file?

neal.....

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 2
RE: Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby... - 9/21/2008 7:39:06 PM   
Valkyrie


Posts: 109
Joined: 1/2/2008
From: Somewhere in Time
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: nealjhebert

Good luck! I've glanced at the disposition of forces and terrain and will be interested to see what strategies the two of you employ.

My initial thoughts on cutting movement points in half is that movement will slow to a crawl because of the terrain involved. Was this accomplished by editing the PDT file?

neal.....


I agree... the terrain will slow things down considerably so cutting movement rates may eliminate maneuver and turn the battle into a line on line slug fest that won't be that interesting to watch.

_____________________________

Signature? Maybe someday over the rainbow.

(in reply to nealjhebert)
Post #: 3
RE: Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby... - 9/21/2008 8:14:55 PM   
Ashantai

 

Posts: 137
Joined: 10/16/2006
Status: offline
I fear they're right. If you cut movement in half you can move only one hex through forest...and since so much of it is forest, it'll be slowing things down to a crawl. I reckon you're alright leaving movement as it is.


(in reply to Valkyrie)
Post #: 4
RE: Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby... - 9/28/2008 3:28:49 AM   
nealjhebert

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 9/6/2008
Status: offline
Game on, or game off?

(in reply to Ashantai)
Post #: 5
RE: Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby... - 10/21/2008 8:35:05 AM   
varjager

 

Posts: 358
Joined: 3/25/2000
From: sweden
Status: offline
Please tell me the game is on. I enjoyed the last AAR alot!

_____________________________


(in reply to nealjhebert)
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> John Tiller's Battleground Series >> After Action Reports >> Bragg was Misuderstood! Chicamauga Baby... Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.844