Mike Dubost
Posts: 273
Joined: 8/24/2008 From: Sacramento, CA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OrvalB All Hail the Invincible Austrian Navy! That long and heroic seafaring history, the ancient traditions of the (very) junior service, the efficiency and perspicacity of Austrian naval infrastructure, as opposed to just the opposite in the military arm, I am in awe! I've run 1914 about 17 times in the last 24 hours, hotseat and AI, and yep, every time the Austrians, at a minimum, go toe to toe, and most of the time, kick Entente asses up and down the block and send them crying home to mummy wahwahwah, no matter what the Entente does. There was only one fluke where they came out behind, and it wasn't that far behind. Does this strike anybody else as just a teeny tiny little bit ahistorical? What is going on here? And no I don't think having the Eastern Fleet hide for a few turns (!no Eastern Trade?!?!) until the Italians and reinforcements show up is a realistic response. A gamey response, maybe, but pretty hard to square with history. And I have no idea if it would work anyway, and don't really care to try, a major shift of British naval power to the Eastern Med to deal with Austrians is so far from any historical reality that it should be laughed out of the house. Incidentally, does anybody know what those Austrohungarian dreadnaughts actually did during the war? I can't remember reading a single thing about them after I dunno 1911 or so. I remember reading about some successful MTB (Motor Torpedo Boat) actions, but I do not recall anything about dreadnaughts. Admittedly, I am hardly an expert on The Great War, but I figure I would have read about major victories, if nothing else in a book my father got from my grandfather. I don't know where he got The Nations at War, but it is a WWI book which ends with something to the effect of who knows what will happen now that the US is in the war. That's right, it was written in 1917! It gives a much differnt picture of the causes of the war than modern histories do, talking about the competing "visions" of the ideal Europe (Pan-Slavic for the Russians, versus greater Germany for Germany and AH). Back to the topic, in my games against the AI, I found that the AH navy can take control of the Eastern Med on any one or two turns they want to, until the Italians join. At that time, the Italians plus the Brits smash them. How come the minor naval powers are so successful? Is there some factor for "target profile"?
|