Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Ike

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> After Action Reports >> Ike Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Ike - 9/11/2008 5:55:44 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline 		Me and Borners game goes to pause as he must prepare his defences against another, more serious Ike.

So we have to hope for him the best.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 31
RE: Ike - 9/12/2008 3:49:21 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		thanks IKE, may your namesake turn away at the last minute and only be a near miss instead of a critcal hit.

As for the game, got another of IKE's MSW's  

(in reply to Ike99)
Post #: 32
RE: Ike - 9/12/2008 5:32:44 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline
quote:

thanks IKE, may your namesake turn away at the last minute and only be a near miss instead of a critcal hit.


Well don´t get all sticky on me. I´m still going to kick your arse in the game.

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 33
New Month - 9/12/2008 10:36:35 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline 		8-1-42



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Ike99 -- 9/12/2008 10:37:11 PM >

(in reply to Ike99)
Post #: 34
RE: New Month - 9/20/2008 10:47:35 PM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		You running short of PC's yet? Probably not, but quite sporting of you to send them out in small groups for my subs to pick them off! 



< Message edited by borner -- 9/20/2008 11:12:43 PM >

(in reply to Ike99)
Post #: 35
RE: New Month - 9/26/2008 2:27:00 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		Not much to report. B-17's hit a convoy off Buna, sinking another MSW (4 lost now), and an AP. In points, IKE has now lost more ships, but he considers these expendable. A sub put 2 torps into one of his nice large ML's, and another barely made it to port afloat. This makes I beleive 3 badly damaged ML's for him. While i wish they had sunk, cutting his minelaying capasity by such a margin so early will pay off later I do believe. In addtion, I hope the loss of his sweepers allows my sub mines to find an extra target.. or two.. or three....

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 36
RE: New Month - 9/26/2008 4:43:35 AM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline
quote:

A sub put 2 torps into one of his nice large ML's


Yes, losing Okinshima, pride of the Imperial mine laying fleet was not good.

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 37
Bug Report - 9/27/2008 3:02:07 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline 		Me and Brian have come into a game bug.

For some reason the entire Japanese 35th Brigade is teleporting from magic from Rabaul to Wunpuko.



So we´ll see how he wants to resolve this.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Ike99)
Post #: 38
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 5:05:27 PM   
jwilkerson


Posts: 10525
Joined: 9/15/2002
From: Kansas
Status: offline 		In WITP we found "disappearing unit" and "teleporting unit" bugs that were related to fragments which had supposedly been deactivated (removed from the map) getting reconnected to actual active units (even ones from the other side), thus causing strange behavior. Did either side have a fragment in that hex recently?

I'm guessing the only way to fix this is for you to go down there and at least pull some fragments out - that still might not bring the whole unit back. If you absolutely want the whole unit back - you may need a "truce" while you go down, pick it up and bring it back to Rabaul.

_____________________________

AE Project Lead
New Game Project Lead

(in reply to Ike99)
Post #: 39
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 6:18:20 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline
quote:

In WITP we found "disappearing unit" and "teleporting unit" bugs that were related to fragments which had supposedly been deactivated (removed from the map) getting reconnected to actual active units (even ones from the other side), thus causing strange behavior. Did either side have a fragment in that hex recently?

I'm guessing the only way to fix this is for you to go down there and at least pull some fragments out - that still might not bring the whole unit back. If you absolutely want the whole unit back - you may need a "truce" while you go down, pick it up and bring it back to Rabaul.


Yes we calling a truce to pick fix this up because now the Units that teleported into Wunpuko are now teleporting into Luganville.

I never had a unit there recently or at all, Borner said he had a engineer unit in route to Wunpuko. We have the saves if you want to look at it.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Ike99 -- 9/27/2008 6:25:02 PM >

(in reply to jwilkerson)
Post #: 40
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 6:25:22 PM   
AbeSimpson


Posts: 151
Joined: 6/23/2008
Status: offline 		Perhaps some kind of a Japanese "Philadelphia Experiment"...........

Such bugs are very annoying........

(in reply to Ike99)
Post #: 41
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 7:28:32 PM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		Star Trek meets UV I guess!!!!!!   Now he has units in Luganville too!!!!!



(in reply to AbeSimpson)
Post #: 42
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 7:33:19 PM   
tocaff


Posts: 4781
Joined: 10/12/2006
From: USA now in Brasil
Status: offline 		No point on the map is safe in the Ikemod!  

_____________________________

Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 43
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 10:10:35 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline
quote:

Star Trek meets UV I guess!!!!!! Now he has units in Luganville too!!!!!






Attachment (1)

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 44
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 10:40:43 PM   
jwilkerson


Posts: 10525
Joined: 9/15/2002
From: Kansas
Status: offline 		Ah - is this a MOD? If so looking at the editor files might be worth while. Like any chance there are duplicate units in there??



_____________________________

AE Project Lead
New Game Project Lead

(in reply to tocaff)
Post #: 45
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 11:02:21 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline
quote:

Ah - is this a MOD? If so looking at the editor files might be worth while. Like any chance there are duplicate units in there??


No, this is not a MOD. normal 2by3 scenario 17, I´m not sure what was meant by that either.

quote:

Ike99 (Japan)-vs-Borner (Allies)
(Game Three)

Scenario 17-100%
All normal settings plus Japanese
submarine doctrine is on.

Houserule- No Nighttime Carrier Operations. Besides this it´s anything goes.


We have all the saves if you want to look and see what´s going on with the program here.

< Message edited by Ike99 -- 9/27/2008 11:04:49 PM >

(in reply to jwilkerson)
Post #: 46
RE: Bug Report - 9/27/2008 11:53:09 PM   
tocaff


Posts: 4781
Joined: 10/12/2006
From: USA now in Brasil
Status: offline 		I think he he saw my joke about it being an Ikemod and forgot that UV can't be changed like WITP.  

_____________________________

Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768

(in reply to Ike99)
Post #: 47
RE: Bug Report - 9/28/2008 12:42:27 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		 
Maybe this is the famous programmers bug, put in on purpose by the origianal programmer to prove his power and knowledge to us mere mortals.

(in reply to tocaff)
Post #: 48
RE: Bug Report - 9/28/2008 12:47:02 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		I am just glad this is a finished product and not in need of another patch.. that oh by the way could adjust the F4U issue....... oops.... I am ranting again... sorry..... 

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 49
RE: Bug Report - 9/28/2008 1:31:19 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		 Death to game bugs!!!!!   swat them!!        
      FIRE PHASERS!!!

guess that is all the sci-fi smilies I could work in.....   

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 50
RE: Bug Report - 9/28/2008 2:11:47 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		Replay the turn and give the 65 brigade a move order into the jungle.

< Message edited by bigred -- 9/28/2008 3:16:57 AM >

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 51
RE: Bug Report - 9/29/2008 1:57:37 AM   
Kingfisher

 

Posts: 234
Joined: 6/16/2008
Status: offline 		I remember witnessing something like this a long time ago, only it was in reverse, with an Australian brigade being teleported to Rabaul.

The brigade was part of a full division unloaded at Lae to assault the city. While the rest of the division got on with the attack, the brigade teleported to Rabaul, but still under the 'launch deliberate attack' orders. Needless to say it suffered horrendous casualties against the well fortified Japanese. Whats even weirder is after the one disastrous attack the brigade teleported back to Lae, but still registering the losses incurred from its battle near Rabaul.

_____________________________

"splendid was their tactic of diving upon our force from the direction of the sun, taking advantage of intermittent clouds"

-Captain Takahisa Amagai, KAGA, June 4th 1942

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 52
RE: Bug Report - 9/29/2008 2:06:53 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		We ended up going back about 2 weeks in the game... sadly, IKE's big ML only took one torp hit this time.

(in reply to Kingfisher)
Post #: 53
RE: Black hole of Rabaul - 9/29/2008 4:24:56 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		Sounds like the "black hole of Rabaul" with an auto transport to a new location.

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 54
RE: Black hole of Rabaul - 9/29/2008 6:29:07 AM   
bigbaba


Posts: 1238
Joined: 11/3/2006
From: Koblenz, Germany
Status: offline 		glad that you dont surrender to this nasty bug and continue this intresting game, gentlemen.

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 55
RE: Black hole of Rabaul - 9/30/2008 3:47:13 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		Bagged a couple more AP's in the last few turns.... the death of a thousand paper cuts goes on. Sadly no new hits on ML's or MSW's recently.

(in reply to bigbaba)
Post #: 56
RE: Black hole of Rabaul - 10/6/2008 12:13:55 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		Hit another of IKE's Minelayers......    Okinshima, having only taken one torp after our jump back, I am sure lived, but this makes 4 of his ML's that have been takes hits. Sunk or not, that's all the fewer mines when I come forward.



Sub attack near Tulagi  at 38,39

Japanese Ships
PC Ch 16, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS S-38


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack at 38,37

Japanese Ships
ML Tsugaru, Torpedo hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS S-42

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 57
RE: Black hole of Rabaul - 10/8/2008 4:00:07 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline 		the drain on IKE's ML's continues... It would have been nice to have bagged both, but I have my first confirmed kill.


Sub attack at 38,36

Japanese Ships
PC Tama Maru #8, Torpedo hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS S-44


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack at 38,36

Japanese Ships
ML Niizaki, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS S-44


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack at 37,35

Japanese Ships
ML Saishu

Allied Ships
SS S-46

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 58
RE: Black hole of Rabaul - 10/19/2008 6:20:39 PM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline

not even any targets for my subs. Ike must have been frightened off!

< Message edited by borner -- 10/19/2008 6:21:39 PM >

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 59
RE: Black hole of Rabaul - 10/19/2008 9:39:12 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline 		Borner tells me he formed a fast transport group at Luganville and it now has 6,000 Japanese troops on it.

So Allied fast transport fleets are now carrying Japanese soldiers around.


(in reply to borner)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> After Action Reports >> Ike Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.453