peskpesk
Posts: 2347
Joined: 7/17/2003 From: Stockholm, Sweden Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: brian brian But when Germany aligns Finland, they are not surprised....so the set-up routine needs to keep that in mind. And just because a paradrop is possible, you have to consider how likely it is. A single PARA corps against a city is not very likely to succeed...is there also enough ground support factors in range to double the strength? Even if so, might it be better to dare the enemy to drop, then walk back and crush their lonely PARA? And as Paul mentions, enemy action limits should be considered. Going back to Finland, one of the checks is for a threat of a DIV invasion. In 1940, this is important. In 1941 at the beginning of Barbarossa, this is irrelevant as the USSR won't be able to take a combined impulse. I plan revises the AI for Finland, since it was the first minor setup and is not in the same format as the other. Many setups there are not shown with an image, also they lake offensive setups due to the scope of the setups has changed slightly since the start. And true it might be a big difference if country is aligned or declared war on, when it comes to choosing setup.
< Message edited by peskpesk -- 10/22/2008 6:11:34 AM >
_____________________________
"'Malta - The Thorn in Rommel's Side"
|