mc82
Posts: 3
Joined: 8/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hertston quote:
ORIGINAL: doomtrader It looks like it is not so great. Just readed about two reviews for 9/10 'Spore' at Metacritic; Average of 66 'critic' reviews; 84%. Average of 1,018 reader reviews, 45%. That's all you need to know about 'reviews', folks The PC Gamer Spore review was a real classic in relation to the "paid off magazine/review site" phenomenon. It was 3 or 4 pages about how the game failed to live up to expectations, and was nothing but a dumbed down series of rudimentary mini-games in each stage (a "basic RTS game", "Civilization for dummies" or something like that, and etc)... Then suddenly turned into: "But it's totally awesome! The graphics are great and it's charming and fun! Don't think of it as a game you're trying to win, think of it as a toy!" That's right folks, challenge sucks! Well, maybe not, but that sounds like the general trend in PC games today. On the Fallout 3 topic, I fully expect the game to be a huge, mainstream hit just like Oblivion, and draw in hordes of FPS fans now declaring themselves to be "totally hardcore RPGers doodz", all the while also being a giant blasphemy to the memory of the classic Fallout games. I'd like to hope myself to be wrong, but nearly all of the previews of F3 have given me exactly this impression- and this time, it doesn't even feature soil erosion.
< Message edited by mc82 -- 10/23/2008 4:20:06 AM >
|