eske
Posts: 258
Joined: 1/2/2008 Status: offline
|
Hi Del In a game I'm in, a player suggested to introduce your house rule 6 about the intention of lapse of war. Below is my comment to that rule. Only I have never played with it. What do you think of my alternative rule? /eske quote:
Comment on the rule: However good intentions there is behind this rule, the formulation is a problem. Making a rule that is based on a players intensions will never work. Particularly in this case, where the rule can be brought up any time between the DoW and some MP gains control of the minor - which could be months - when the lapse of war occurs. And that is - in most cases - the earliest time the intension with the DoW can be questioned. In short, it prohibits a DoW a month or more after it was done. How do you execute that ?? Another formulation, that occurs to me to be more in the spirit of the game, would involve a penalty in PPs for lapse of war, say: 'Lapse of war with a minor, where no other MP supports the minor or has made a simultanious DoW on same minor, cost -2PPs to the MP, who DoW'ed the minor.' This can of course be made more complicated by taking a lot of special cases in consideration, but I can't come up with cases where it seems worthwhile.
_____________________________
Alea iacta est
|