06 Maestro
Posts: 3989
Joined: 10/12/2005 From: Nevada, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: oldspec4 My computer specs are very similar to yours so its a no go for me at this time. My gaming rig also has a N Vidia 256 graphics board. This is the first time a game has over taxed my system-I knew the day would come. I have 2 Gigs of RAM in the mail from Crucial; I will report on the improvement asap. quote:
ORIGINAL: Additionally, it seems like the game is a lot of work and no fun subject to further patches and an updated manual. The "work" in this game is figuring out how to play the darn thing. I have made considerable progress, but there is great depth yet to explore. I don't know why developers don't have a standard, "golden rule" to include in the manual a straight forward list of tasks/actions, in order with pertinent details, of a complete turn, from beginning to end. They seem to think everyone should know what is already in their head-I don't, I need them to tell me. I wonder how many players just give up on a game because it is too much trouble to figure out how to play it. Being in a hurry to get it to market is no rational reason for not doing this-one extra hour of development time seems a small price to pay for this "feature". I have had some fun with this game. I have already have come across several areas that are very interesting. Things that add a healthy dash of realism and things that will make for excellent game play regarding: orders, methods of movement, reserve positioning, and deployments. There are other areas of the game I have hardly looked at because of the current difficulties. When this game is brought up to speed, it could very well be the best mutiplayer strategy game on the market. It is a WEGO type. quote:
ORIGINAL: oldspec4 Agree that GOA has been a very good , trouble-free WW1 gaming experience. GoA is indeed a very good game. I do not have any problem with the UI other than the map (and scrolling). If that game had a zoom-able map, I would upgrade it from "very good" to "great". I guess you can't have it all.
< Message edited by 06 Maestro -- 11/19/2008 10:35:05 PM >
|